Quote:

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25879579-2,00.html

I wonder what religion they would be?

Note: the question is rhetorical.

Quote:

Australia foils suicide attack on army base, four arrested: police

Australian police have arrested four people with alleged links to Somali Islamists who were planning a suicide attack on a military base, senior officers said on Tuesday.

"The alleged offenders were prepared to inflict a sustained attack on military personnel until they themselves were killed," said Tony Negus, acting chief commissioner of the Australian Federal Police.

"The men's intentions was to go into these army barracks and to kill as many people as possible.... This would have been, if it had been able to be carried out, the most serious attack on Australian soil," he added.

The suspects of Somali and Lebanese descent were arrested in a series of raids across the southeastern state of Victoria, Negus said.

He said the attack would have been carried out with firearms rather than explosives and added the group had been seeking a "fatwah" to justify its actions.

"Members of the group have been actively seeking a fatwah or religious ruling to justify a terror attack on Australia," Negus said.

Negus said members of the group had links with Somalia's Al-Qaeda-inspired Shebab group, which is fighting a deadly insurgency against that country's government.

http://www.france24.com/en/20090804-australia-foils-suicide-attack-army-base-fou...

[The target was Holsworthy. Cowardly animals.]

tallowood wrote on Aug 4^th, 2009 at 5:23pm:



This is what I thought too.
Just talk, because it has to be said that way.

Our democratic rights gag us so well you don't need anything else!

Happy - Guess what , I like cops.

Maybe that cop "emphasised" there is no reflection of "terrorists" with "Islam"  on purpose.
there probably is no cause to associate ISLAM with TERRORISM.

At all.

Quote:



The interesting thing is that propagandists like our reident pseudo-moor never tire of rolling out the Muslims-are-victims trope every time their co-religionists engage in yet one more despicable act. Every time a Muslim is caught doing some crazy or barbaric things, the Abu Rashid/Keyzar Trad/your-imam-here brigade rushes out with the we-are-the-victims schtik.
They are not victims of anything but each other.

And every time a Muslim does something crazy or despicable in non-muslim countries, they roll out that other stock response of the seasoned apologist for Muslim terrorists, the 'infidels-in-muslim-lands' excuse. Never hear about Muslims-in-infidel-lands'. The Barbary pirates, I mean victims, enslaved a million Europeans until the US navy put an end to that particular Muslim menace, I mean victimhood. Never hear about it from the Muslim 'victims'.

Or what about this:

“Where the French presence lasted fewer than four years before they were ignominiously expelled by the British and Turks, the Ottomans had been the masters of Egypt since 1517, a total of 280 years. Even if we count the later British and French protectorates, Egypt was under Western control for sixty-seven years, Syria for twenty-one years, and Iraq for only fifteen — and, of course, Saudi Arabia was never under Western control. Contrast this with southern Spain, which was under the Muslim yoke for 781 years, Greece for 381 years, and the splendid new Christian capital that eclipsed Rome — Byzantium — which is still in Muslim hands. But no Spanish or Greek politics of victimhood apparently exist.”

Abu Rashid and Keysar Trad and their ilk do a very thorough job of removing any remaing association between the words 'muslim' and 'credible'.i

I am sure muslim chat room will be praying for this load of wannabe terrorists.
They were for the last terrorists.

Abu did not speak out against the alleged terrorists either.

it's quite sickening really.

Australian citizens ?? That means a piece of paper.

muslims do not speak out against any other muslims.
It is one of their perverse ideas.