Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
Hitchens in Australia (Read 9754 times)
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #45 - Oct 17th, 2009 at 9:23pm
 
Soren wrote on Oct 17th, 2009 at 9:20pm:
God you can denounce all you like -you are going to be talking to the mirror anyway, to the god you imagine in your own image.

But go into an old church whose threshold has been worn hollow over the centuries. Stand in the stillness of that church - and then denounce the centuries of prayers, hopes and curses that were uttered by the men and women whose feet wore that threshhold hollow. Denounce them as deluded and I will call you a complete and utter prick. Whoever you are.

Aw Soren... You lachrymose old dweeb Grin
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #46 - Oct 17th, 2009 at 9:46pm
 
You are quick - keen even - to get the wrong end of the stick, aren't you? Is this a pattern in your life?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #47 - Oct 17th, 2009 at 9:55pm
 
Soren wrote on Oct 17th, 2009 at 9:46pm:
You are quick - keen even - to get the wrong end of the stick, aren't you? Is this a pattern in your life?


That's enough sherry for you, tonight.  Cry
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #48 - Oct 17th, 2009 at 10:03pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 17th, 2009 at 9:23pm:
Soren wrote on Oct 17th, 2009 at 9:20pm:
God you can denounce all you like -you are going to be talking to the mirror anyway, to the god you imagine in your own image.

But go into an old church whose threshold has been worn hollow over the centuries. Stand in the stillness of that church - and then denounce the centuries of prayers, hopes and curses that were uttered by the men and women whose feet wore that threshhold hollow. Denounce them as deluded and I will call you a complete and utter prick. Whoever you are.

Aw Soren... You lachrymose old dweeb Grin


I got the same feeling when I entered a 2500 year old Etruscan tomb in Italy, or when I stood on the limestone blocks of the now ruined  temple called the Ara Della Regina in the ruins of Etruscan Tarquinia. It's a 'spiritual' thing.

This was a civilisation that was long dead and almost forgotten even in the days of the Romans.

As Propertius wrote of another Etruscan city (Veii)

heu Veii veteres! et vos tum regna fuistis,
et vestro posita est aurea sella foro:
nunc intra muros pastoris bucina lenti
cantat, et in vestris ossibus arua metunt.

Veii, you had a royal crown of old,
And in your forum stood a throne of gold!
Your walls now echo but the shepherd’s horn,
And over your ashes waves the summer corn.


Yes, You have to maintain a certain respect and a sense of awe for the past.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 17th, 2009 at 10:13pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #49 - Oct 17th, 2009 at 10:12pm
 
muso wrote on Oct 17th, 2009 at 10:03pm:
I got the same feeling when I entered a 2500 year old Etruscan tomb in Italy, or when I stood on the limestone blocks of the now ruined  temple called the Ara Della Regina in the ruins of Etruscan Tarquinia. It's a 'spiritual' thing.

You have to maintain a certain respect and a sense of awe for the past.

Yes... understand all that... Who wouldn't feel a sense of awe? And it's even more poignant for those of us from young cultures... Like standing in an empty ancient European church at night, listening to someone playing 'The Lonely Shepherd' on a flute.

Old worlders feel it in their blood, so they're not as shaken to the core as we are by an old church.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Mercedes With Square Wheels
Ex Member


Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #50 - Oct 17th, 2009 at 10:57pm
 
I would enjoy Hitchens a lot more if he hadn't generated an enormous cadre of adulating little drones. The worst thing about the "New Atheists" is that their followers always tend to fancy themselves as insightful critical thinkers but are really as rigid as the people they criticise. This doesn't make them incorrect, of course.

Doesn't not make them twats either.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #51 - Oct 17th, 2009 at 11:06pm
 
Quote:
I would enjoy Hitchens a lot more if he hadn't generated an enormous cadre of adulating little drones. The worst thing about the "New Atheists" is that their followers always tend to fancy themselves as insightful critical thinkers but are really as rigid as the people they criticise. This doesn't make them incorrect, of course.

Doesn't not make them twats either.

Would you rather watch the fawning audiences of creationists and intelligent designists as they mangle logic with their outrageous sophistry?

Now that's what I'd call twattery unmitigated.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Mercedes With Square Wheels
Ex Member


Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #52 - Oct 17th, 2009 at 11:55pm
 
No poo, but let's face it; the science-worshipping New Atheists hate Darwin too, just in different ways from the creationists. While they will (and perhaps rightfully so) ridicule and scoff at the egregious distortion of logic by creationists, their own rational facade always breaks down almost instantly whenever science runs counter to their own egalitarian world views. Their dedication to Darwin runs as far as their own self-imposed perception of how they would like the world to look, and if the trifling matter of the truth compromises this, they edit, ignore and compartmentalize it. At least the creationists, with their overt disdain for the scientific method, are internally consistent.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #53 - Oct 18th, 2009 at 12:03am
 
Quote:
No poo, but let's face it; the science-worshipping New Atheists hate Darwin too, just in different ways from the creationists. While they will (and perhaps rightfully so) ridicule and scoff at the egregious distortion of logic by creationists, their own rational facade always breaks down almost instantly whenever science runs counter to their own egalitarian world views. Their dedication to Darwin runs as far as their own self-imposed perception of how they would like the world to look, and if the trifling matter of the truth compromises this, they edit, ignore and compartmentalize it. At least the creationists, with their overt disdain for the scientific method, are internally consistent.

Drunk in charge of a post-modern essay generator, tonight? Grin
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Mercedes With Square Wheels
Ex Member


Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #54 - Oct 18th, 2009 at 12:15am
 
It's all of this Czech beer I've been drinking!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #55 - Oct 18th, 2009 at 5:33am
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 17th, 2009 at 11:06pm:
Would you rather watch the fawning audiences of creationists and intelligent designists as they mangle logic with their outrageous sophistry?

Now that's what I'd call twattery unmitigated.


Oh yes, if Pseudoscience were an Olympic event, Intelligent Design advocates would take the gold medal.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #56 - Oct 18th, 2009 at 8:27am
 
Unfortunately there are twats abounding in every hue and colour of philosophical debate, which makes the idea they ascribe to neither right, nor wrong, so leaving the fact aside that you do not have to throw a rock far in any direction, to hit an idiot, the truth is that the image that some try to portray of anti-theists as some type of obsessive extremists, is innacurate, and a mere distraction from the core questions that they raise.

Most I would certainly expect to be a lot like me, people who see religion as a tool, misused by so many, to attempt to control, and/or influence, people to march to their particular tune.
When that tune inspires a merry jig, then all is well and good, but when it is used to inspire a goose step, then we have real problems.
The fact that the pipers who play these tunes are self appointed social engineers whose tools are fanciful threats and promises, is what causes some, like myself, to question just why should we allow them to call the tune at all.

If they did not seek to influence society beyond the walls of their temples, my position would be one of sad observation, that they impose their reckless rules and imagery onto their young, in a totally dogmatic environment which rejects open and thoughtful enquiry, in favour of unquestioning adherence to their creed, which still mixes the vile and malevolent with the spiritual and sublime, to the point where many can not recognise the difference.
This is when you see what would be normal, caring people, calling for those that transgress their particular codes rules, to be consumed by hellfire.
The degree of intolerance that is promoted, as protecting "god's word" is of real concern, for god's word still thinks homosexuality is an abomination, and that adulterer's need the death penalty, in this world, not in the make believe next, that they subjugate their very existence in favour of pursuing.
So while I know that most people ignore these obscene idiocies, their creeds, and religion's most certainly do not, they are their in the books, just waiting for the next piper to come along and start piping their tune again, and that is an intolerable threat on all our freedoms.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #57 - Oct 18th, 2009 at 8:56am
 
mozzaok wrote on Oct 18th, 2009 at 8:27am:
Unfortunately there are twats abounding in every hue and colour of philosophical debate, which makes the idea they ascribe to neither right, nor wrong, so leaving the fact aside that you do not have to throw a rock far in any direction, to hit an idiot, the truth is that the image that some try to portray of anti-theists as some type of obsessive extremists, is innacurate, and a mere distraction from the core questions that they raise.

Most I would certainly expect to be a lot like me, people who see religion as a tool, misused by so many, to attempt to control, and/or influence, people to march to their particular tune.
When that tune inspires a merry jig, then all is well and good, but when it is used to inspire a goose step, then we have real problems.
The fact that the pipers who play these tunes are self appointed social engineers whose tools are fanciful threats and promises, is what causes some, like myself, to question just why should we allow them to call the tune at all.



Undoubtedly.

However, consider this. Sociology has some answers, usually small and peripheral. Its take on religion is an example. That organised religion has aspects of social and political control is commonplace. (What social organisation or interaction doesn't?) From this to deduce that all social organisation and interaction are only, or mainly, political or that organised religion is primarily concerned with social and political organisation is erroneous.
Anti-clericalism has a lot going for it, as all correctives do. But to reduce the "god question" to a political or sociological one is grossly reductive and leaves out what is really important. Life is much too large and complex to be modelled and then explained away by "social science".
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #58 - Oct 18th, 2009 at 9:09am
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 18th, 2009 at 12:03am:
Quote:
No poo, but let's face it; the science-worshipping New Atheists hate Darwin too, just in different ways from the creationists. While they will (and perhaps rightfully so) ridicule and scoff at the egregious distortion of logic by creationists, their own rational facade always breaks down almost instantly whenever science runs counter to their own egalitarian world views. Their dedication to Darwin runs as far as their own self-imposed perception of how they would like the world to look, and if the trifling matter of the truth compromises this, they edit, ignore and compartmentalize it. At least the creationists, with their overt disdain for the scientific method, are internally consistent.

Drunk in charge of a post-modern essay generator, tonight? Grin



Helian, your chase after what eludes you most - wit. And in that rush, understanding also evades you. This is what I mean by the wrong end of the stick. You sacrifice understanding just to appear witty but more often than not you are left standing both witless and confused.

When you are not trying to appear witty you do say interesting things - you do get the right end of the stick. So invert the priorities, pal. You can do it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Hitchens in Australia
Reply #59 - Oct 18th, 2009 at 9:24am
 
Soren wrote on Oct 18th, 2009 at 9:09am:
Helian, your chase after what eludes you most - wit. And in that rush, understanding also evades you. This is what I mean by the wrong end of the stick. You sacrifice understanding just to appear witty but more often than not you are left standing both witless and confused.

When you are not trying to appear witty you do say interesting things - you do get the right end of the stick. So invert the priorities, pal. You can do it.

Sleepless night, Soren? Grin

Yea, ‘Drunk in charge of a twat-o-graph’ would’ve been funnier, but it sounded a bit more confronting than I was intending.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print