Soren wrote on Apr 13
th, 2010 at 3:20pm:
It's up to the parents, not the kids, anyway. Children do not 'choose' what to study in school.
Actually they do to a large extent when they get into the last few years of High School. Theoretically the parents have the final say, but in practice, kids make the decisions on their education path depending on their interests.
Mozz - If you want to remove all that is irrational in teaching, then your target needs to be much broader than religion. You might consider English Literature for one.
The works of James Joyce should definitely be banned for being subversive. Let's add DH Lawrence and hmmm let's see - William Shakespeare - all that irrational stuff about star crossed lovers who commit suicide - sounds very subversive and dangerous to me. The next thing we'd know teenagers would be doing away with themselves.
In fact, let's take anything that provides insight into the human condition. Dangerous irrational creatures, these humans. We must avoid Christianity, and Hinduism and ....Art of any description.
Teaching kids about adults - now that's just downright disgusting. J D Salinger can go on the bonfire straight away.
OK comrade, which books shall we permit in this Brave New World?
Dawkins?
No way. Have you seen what the suicide rate in Atheists is like? That's positively subversive stuff.
So at this stage, we're kinda on a parallel with the Khmer Rouge. Is that where you see your brave new world heading?