Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 24
Send Topic Print
The Peak Energy Debate (Read 123136 times)
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #210 - Jan 6th, 2011 at 10:15pm
 
High Oil Prices Will Lead to an Oil Exploration Boom in 2011


Oil is like any other commodity: if price go up, people will produce more of it to sell. Despite the bleatings of peak oil sheep, oil companies are responding to recently elevated oil prices. Many are in fact scrambling to find and produce more oil.

From giants Saudi Aramco and Exxon Mobil Corp. to five-person wildcat outfits, the industry plans to spend nearly a half-trillion dollars next year to find and extract oil and natural gas, according to a new survey by investment bank Barclays Capital.

For the first time in several years, large Western oil companies are leading the industry's charge, increasing their budgets faster than the state-run national oil companies that have dominated spending in recent years.

"This is being driven by the appetite to find more oil, comfort that today's oil prices will be sustained and companies getting out of a hunker-down, recession mode," said James West, an energy analyst with Barclays, who co-authored the survey, which has been produced every year since 1982. _Rigzone

The key question oil executives as themselves is, "Will the high prices of oil stay high?" During the speculative runup in oil prices from 2007-2008, it was clear to most wise analysts that the high prices could not last. And indeed oil prices crashed to relatively low levels in 2009.

Oil has always been a boom and bust industry, with multiple price elevations followed inevitably by price crashes, and so on. That is one reason for the formation of OPEC -- the perceived need to maintain a stable price level for oil.

More on the investing side from Phil McPherson:

With the economy recovering, and as more people feel that the double-dip recession is not going to happen, oil prices are tending to stay stronger. However, it seems to me the tail is wagging the dog right now, with the U.S. dollar going down and the price of bonds being up, and the yield being extremely low. To me, it has more to do with the price of oil than necessarily the pure supply and demand fundamentals, because we still have excess supply of oil via OPEC. If you're bullish on oil or bullish on the economy, then you use those dips as opportunities to gain more exposure.

...But as with any business, when the demand is there and the visibility is there, entrepreneurs rise up to the challenge because they know they can make money. I think you're going to be surprised that in 2011 the likes of Halliburton Co. (NYSE:HAL) and Schlumberger Ltd. (NYSE:SLB), as well as lot of other smaller companies, are going to have more crews out working. There's going to be enough demand there. It's all a function of oil prices, and as long as they are in this relative range, people are going to continue to drill these wells. I don't think margin makes as much of an impact as the NAV that you can grow with these companies via drilling these wells and growing reserves. _IBTimes

The world is floating in hydrocarbons. North American shale gas has barely gotten started, and the technology for repeating that miracle is in high demand worldwide -- from Israel to China to South America.

As long as current oil prices remain above $70 (2010 dollars), exploration and production will continue to accelerate for both oil and wet gas. Higher prices -- above US $80, will spur even greater investment and faster development.

The next time someone tells you there is no flexibility in oil production, and that demand for hydrocarbons absolutely must continue to rise exponentially, you would be wise to bid the person a good day, and seek other companionship.

Link -
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Oil-Prices/High-Oil-Prices-Will-Lead-to-an-Oil-Exploration-Boom-in-2011.html
=====================
What a load of CRAP!

As can be seen from the following chart, the Oil Price had been on the rise since 2002, before Peaking in 2008, diving to a low in early 2009 and it has since been surging upward again.

During all that time, with the massive Pricing incentive, what did Production do?

It hovered around, within a fairly narrow band, it did not keep up with Population or Demand increases and it certainly did nothing in response to the massive Pricing increases since 2002!  

Why has production not given the "Capitalist Response"?

Because most of the older established fields are Peaking and going into permanent decline and the newer, smaller fields coming on-stream are not of sufficient size to offset the depleting older fields.

So Production has now Plateaued, ahead of the inescapable, permanent post Peak downhill slid, of the Hubbert bell curve!

The next time someone tells you, "The world is floating in hydrocarbons", you would be wise to bid the person a good day!


...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 7th, 2011 at 11:02am by perceptions_now »  
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #211 - Jan 9th, 2011 at 11:46am
 
Rare Earths Shortage Becoming Problem For Refiners


HOUSTON (Dow Jones)--The skyrocketing cost of rare-earth metals coming out of China is pushing up the cost of gasoline production in the U.S., the latest sign of the wide-reaching impact of Beijing's decision to restrict exports of the minerals.

Prices for some of the chemicals refiners use to process gasoline have risen exponentially after China, which controls about 95% of the world's rare-earth supply, said it would slash exports of the metals by 35% in 2011. The increase could raise gasoline production costs by about a penny a gallon and potentially lead some refiners to cut back on fuel production, and is expected to become a topic in many refiners' earnings conference calls in the first quarter of 2011.

Rare earths, elements that go into high-tech batteries, television sets and military technology, are also used in the catalyst component of refiners' gasoline-making fluid catalytic cracking units, or FCCUs. Although rare earths account for only up to 4% of catalysts used in these units, their recent price increase has added as much as an extra 25% to catalyst costs, according to the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association, a group representing the sector.

Refiners acknowledged that catalyst costs were growing but declined to elaborate.

Link -
http://www.thelion.com/bin/forum.cgi?tf=wall_street_pit&msg=2064324&cmd=r&t=
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #212 - Jan 13th, 2011 at 12:13pm
 
One of the comments following this article -
"If the available amount of net energy is declining, in particular despite increasing extracted volumes of various types of hydrocarbons, then humanity is collectively in trouble..."


...

From the article -
"I mention this because as 2010 comes to a close, it appears that for the fifth year in a row the peak production year of 2005–in which the world produced oil at an average, annual rate of 73.718 mbpd–will once again not be exceeded. This is truly an astonishing result given that a new pricing era for oil began in 2004 as oil rose above 40.00 dollars a barrel. For over five years national oil companies and publicly traded oil companies have been free to sell oil into an ever-rising price environment. But no increase in global crude oil production has been forthcoming. Moreover, during the five year period from 2006-2010, global crude oil production actually fell in three of those years: 2006, 2007, and 2009. Equally notable is that OPEC–which currently accounts for about 42% of global supply– has been roughly steady in producing 30-32 mbpd each year during the same same period while Non-OPEC, accounting for 58% of world production has struggled with decline. | see: Global Annual Average Crude Oil Production in mbpd 2001-2010."

Link -
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/7349#comments_top=========================
A few observations -
1) The plateau/decline in Production started in 2005, well prior to the late 2007 financial implosion, as did the rise in Oil & general Energy Pricing.
2) The Non-OPEC Production has struggled, despite the Canadian Tar Sands & the large spike in Russian Production.
3) Despite a perfect opportunity to utilise the much vaunted OPEC spare capacity, in a situation of lower than required overall Production & rising Prices, we have actually seen a flat total OPEC production & a decline in Saudi Production.

So, what is the likely outcome to the above highlighted comment ?
It is!
(declining)
And, WE ARE!
(in trouble)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #213 - Jan 13th, 2011 at 1:52pm
 
New low fuel consumption Vehicle (Carcycle)


...

Low on Fossil Fuel Consumption!

Too bad about the speed!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #214 - Jan 20th, 2011 at 8:55pm
 
Richard Heinberg: Peak Oil and the Globe's Limitations


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #215 - Jan 23rd, 2011 at 10:05pm
 
Where's the rest of the oil?


While pessimists fear that the planet's oil supply will run out in the not too distant future, BP's latest deal with Russia's Rosneft to drill in the Arctic appears to tell a different story.

When BP first formed an alliance with Rosneft in 1998 to develop the Sakhalin fields in the Pacific Ocean, the UK oil giant estimated Russia's oil reserves at 56 billion barrels.

When BP agreed its share-swap with the Moscow-based energy group last weekend, the estimate was 75 billion barrels, and development of Rosneft's licences inside the Arctic Circle could increase production enormously.

Such advances undermine the pessimists' predictions that the world's oil will imminently run out. In 1956, when the concept of "peak oil" – the point at which production starts falling – was formulated, US output was expected to fall from the late 1960s. But new discoveries have constantly pushed that date back. BP was estimating world oil reserves at 1 trillion barrels 20 years ago: now, despite record consumption, the estimate is 1.333 trillion.

In the developed world at least, energy consumption has flattened and may already have started a permanent decline. Demand fell by 1.1 per cent in 2009, although that may have had as much to do with short-term recession as with long-term efficiencies and changes in usage.

Francis Osborne, an analyst at energy consultants Wood Mackenzie, believes that demand has now bounced back and is heading for new records. "Just three years from the onset of the great recession, global oil demand has recovered to the pre-recession peak seen in 2007," he says.

"By 2012, we expect OECD demand to still be more than 5 per cent below pre-recession levels, while demand in the emerging markets will by 6.5 million barrels a day higher."

Even with Western economies picking up, BP expects that disparity to continue. It revealed projections last week that it normally reserves for internal use but which show OECD energy demand rising at just 0.3 per cent a year over the next two decades – and consumption per head falling – with domestic users and service businesses accounting for all that growth while manufacturing and transport usage falls. However, other countries' consumption will increase by 2.6 per cent annually, says BP, meaning that emerging markets will use 68 per cent more power in 2030 than today.

That extra demand puts pressure on the world's reserves of oil, natural gas and coal. BP reckons that the 1.333 trillion barrels of known oil reserves are sufficient to last for just over 45 years – though time estimates vary greatly. Saudi Arabia has sufficient supplies to meet its needs for 66 years and Iraq has enough for 142 years, while the US would run out by 2018 if it did not import.

Russia is already the world's top oil and gas producer: its equivalent of 18 million barrels of oil a day now exceeds America's 17 million and is far ahead of Saudi Arabia's 11 million. But while the extent of its reserves is constantly being revised upward, so too are those of many other countries.

In 1980, BP estimated Nigeria's reserves at 16.7 billion barrels; now it says they are 36.2 billion. During that time, estimates of Libya's reserves have been increased from 20 billion to 44 billion, Venezuela's from under 20 billion to almost 100 billion and Iraq's from 30 billion to 115 billion.

New discoveries are running at 15 billion to 20 billion barrels a year, meeting at least half the global consumption.

Link -
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/wheres-the-rest...
==================
A couple of observations -
1) Why would anyone trust the Oil industy figures for Reserves?
The article points out that BP's Global Estimated Reserves 20 years ago was 1 Trillion Barrels.
Since 1990, according to "official" EIA figures, we (humans) have Consumed Oil at an Annual average of 75 Billion Barrels, which equates to 1.5 Trillion Barrels.
The BP article also says that New Oil discoveries have been in the range of 15-20 Billion Barrels a year, it also says that the current Reserves are 1.33 Trillion barrels.

Do the maths and see how it works out???
I'll give you a hint, if these Reserves are done similar to how OPEC does theirs why would you trust them.

OPEC, back in the 1980's looked to set up a production system for each member country, based on the size of the countries Reserves, so over night each country massively increased the size of their Reserves, without finding a drop of new Oil and that is where their Reserves figures have stayed, no upward or downward movement, right thru until today.

2) The article says that the 1.333 trillion barrels of known oil reserves are sufficient to last for just over 45 years – though time estimates vary greatly.

Well, my maths must be different, because even at the same rate of Consumption, as the last 20 years, which was 75 Billions per year, that is only enough for just under 18 years.

That not even current consumption or allowing for any Growth at all, that under 18 years Oil, at the average Consumption of the last 20 years, with what BP says are the current Reserves.

I should also say here that the Depletion of Existing fields, is far outstripping New Discoveries!

Please do the MATHS!!!

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 23rd, 2011 at 10:59pm by perceptions_now »  
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #216 - Jan 24th, 2011 at 6:09pm
 
OPEC poised to dominate global energy markets


The OPEC domination of the global energy markets is set to grow, says BP in its just released BP Energy Outlook, and it made headlines all over the globe, sending shivers through some spines. The outlook underlined that world is entering an era of OPEC dominance over the markets.

BP’s forecast shows that over the next 20 years OPEC will become as powerful as it was in its golden years in the 70’s — in the immediate aftermath of the 1973 Arab oil embargo. BP Energy Outlook 2030 predicts that the OPEC would see its market share rise to 46 per cent from the current 40 percent, over the coming two decades — “a position not seen since 1977.”

With 75 percent of growth in global oil reserves over the next two decades, to come from OPEC nations, Kuwait, Iran, Angola, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Nigeria, its market share is bound to go up.


And now, with unrestrained non-OPEC oil-output growth slowing, global inventories are set to slide, making OPEC a much more potent market force than in recent times.

The BP Energy Outlook also confirms that the world will need to explore in remote regions, like the Arctic and deeper water than ever before, if it is to keep pace with a 1.7 percent annual rise in consumption — a 39 percent increase over 20 years, to about 102 million bpd by 2030, an increase of 16.5 million bpd from today’s level.

Saudi Arabia should be able to add another 3 million barrels, and the output addition from Iraq is to be significant too, from the current 2.5 million bpd to 5.5 million bpd.

An additional 2 million bpd of production should come from Canada’s controversial oil sands, while biofuels made from corn or sugar are predicted to provide a huge 5 million bpd.

The BP projections make it clear that oil will probably be the slowest growing source of energy, with huge extra demand for renewable, gas and coal also adding to pressure on the world’s resources. Oil is currently the dominant source of world energy, closely followed by coal, on which China is dependent for much of its industrial fuel.


In the meantime, brushing aside the Peak Oil theorists, Iraq and Venezuela are now claiming to have considerably larger reserves than earlier thought. As per, Iraq’s Oil Ministry’s official spokesman, Assem Jihad, Iraq’s oil reserves have now touched 500 billion barrels. “The size of Iraq’s oil reserves has reached about 500 billion barrels nowadays, whilst the previous oil reserves had reached 143 billion barrels,” Jihad said, adding that the above increase represent the 64 oil fields only.

And Venezuela is also claiming to have overtaken Saudi Arabia as the world leader in oil reserves with certified deposits leaping to 297 billion barrels at the end of 2010, President Hugo Chavez’s government said last week.

Link -
http://arabnews.com/economy/article240174.ece
==================
All sorts of claims can be made about Reserves & spare capacity and have been previously!

That said, the test of these claims is ACTUAL PRODUCTION and the last 5 years tells a tale, whislt the next 5 years will tell an even bigger tale.

Following are the top producing nations, in Thousands of Barrels per  Day (Total Oil Supply), from 2005 to 2010, as provided by the EIA -

Russia - 9,677; 9,878; 9,794; 9,933; 10,126
Saudi Arabia - 10,665; 10,248 10,783; 9,759; 10,017
United States - 8,330; 8,456; 8,514; 9,155; 9,563
Iran - 4,149; 4,039; 4,179; 4,176; 4,253
China - 3,865; 3,925; 3,986; 3,995; 4,234
Canada - 3,286; 3,433; 3,331; 3,294; 3,311
Mexico - 3,709; 3,500; 3,186; 3,001; 2,992
United Arab Emirates - 2,948; 2,947; 3,046; 2,794; 2,811
Brazil - 2,164; 2,282; 2,439; 2,577; 2,720
Kuwait - 2,662; 2,603; 2,728; 2,496; TBA
Nigeria - 2,442; 2,352; 2,168; 2,211; 2,434
Iraq - 2,009; 2,096; 2,385; 2,400; 2,399
Venezuela - 2,803; 2,666; 2,638; 2,471; 2,354
Norway - 2,786; 2,564; 2,463; 2,350; 2,118
Kazakhstan - 1,387; 1,445; 1,430; 1,540; 1,598
Qatar - 1,138; 1,121; 1,203; 1,212; 1,397
United Kingdom (Offshore) - 1,602; 1,601; 1,502; 1,422; 1,319

Link -
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=5&pid=57&aid=1&cid...

The future will see if Reserves or Production tell the real story!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #217 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 10:14pm
 
James Howard Kunstler talks about Peak Oil and Financial Decline

I do not agree with him in some points, but his idea about post-oil era urban design is worth to listen and at least, he is entertaining.

http://catchnresearch.blogspot.com/2011/01/james-howard-kunstler-talks-about-pea...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #218 - Jan 30th, 2011 at 10:30pm
 
On the Edge with Max Kaiser-Peak oil story-01-27-2011-(Part1)





On the Edge with Max Kaiser-Peak oil story-01-27-2011-(Part2)




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #219 - Jan 31st, 2011 at 7:45pm
 
On the Edge with Max Kaiser-Peak oil story-01-27-2011- (Part 3)


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #220 - Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:24pm
 
Robert Hirsch on Peak Oil







============
Robert Hirsch interview with Jim Puplava, well worth the time!
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:30pm by perceptions_now »  
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #221 - Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:45pm
 
Peak Oil 101: A Closer Look at Oil Production and Demand


...

Take a good long hard look at that chart. The Saudis say they can ramp up production at any time. Their peak production occurred in 2005. That’s funny. Matt Simmons said peak worldwide production would occur in 2005. When prices skyrocketed in 2008, the Saudis did not reach their previous peak production of 2005. Why? Did they not want to make billions of profits? Only a fool would pass up such riches, unless they just didn’t really have the ability to produce more.

Now Saudi production is 14% below 2008 levels.

According to the IEA:
Global oil product demand for 2010 and 2011 is revised up by an average of 320 kb/d on higher-than-expected submissions, reflecting buoyant global economic growth and cold northern hemisphere weather. Global oil demand, assessed at 87.7 mb/d in 2010 (+2.7 mb/d year-on-year), rises by 1.4 mb/d to 89.1 mb/d in 2011.

World oil demand in 2011 will exceed the 2007 all-time peak demand by 2.4 million barrels per day.

Why would the Saudis be producing at 14% below 2008 levels when worldwide demand in 2011 will reach an all-time high?

Peak oil is here, people. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck - it's probably a duck.

...

Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/250672-peak-oil-101-a-closer-look-at-oil-product...
==============
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #222 - Feb 9th, 2011 at 4:13pm
 
WikiLeaks cables: Saudi Arabia cannot pump enough oil to keep a lid on prices

US diplomat convinced by Saudi expert that reserves of world's biggest oil exporter have been overstated by nearly 40%

The US fears that Saudi Arabia, the world's largest crude oil exporter, may not have enough reserves to prevent oil prices escalating, confidential cables from its embassy in Riyadh show.

The cables, released by WikiLeaks, urge Washington to take seriously a warning from a senior Saudi government oil executive that the kingdom's crude oil reserves may have been overstated by as much as 300bn barrels – nearly 40%.

The revelation comes as the oil price has soared in recent weeks to more than $100 a barrel on global demand and tensions in the Middle East. Many analysts expect that the Saudis and their Opec cartel partners would pump more oil if rising prices threatened to choke off demand.

However, Sadad al-Husseini, a geologist and former head of exploration at the Saudi oil monopoly Aramco, met the US consul general in Riyadh in November 2007 and told the US diplomat that Aramco's 12.5m barrel-a-day capacity needed to keep a lid on prices could not be reached.

According to the cables, which date between 2007-09, Husseini said Saudi Arabia might reach an output of 12m barrels a day in 10 years but before then – possibly as early as 2012 – global oil production would have hit its highest point. This crunch point is known as "peak oil".

Husseini said that at that point Aramco would not be able to stop the rise of global oil prices because the Saudi energy industry had overstated its recoverable reserves to spur foreign investment. He argued that Aramco had badly underestimated the time needed to bring new oil on tap.

One cable said: "According to al-Husseini, the crux of the issue is twofold. First, it is possible that Saudi reserves are not as bountiful as sometimes described, and the timeline for their production not as unrestrained as Aramco and energy optimists would like to portray."

It went on: "In a presentation, Abdallah al-Saif, current Aramco senior vice-president for exploration, reported that Aramco has 716bn barrels of total reserves, of which 51% are recoverable, and that in 20 years Aramco will have 900bn barrels of reserves.

"Al-Husseini disagrees with this analysis, believing Aramco's reserves are overstated by as much as 300bn barrels. In his view once 50% of original proven reserves has been reached … a steady output in decline will ensue and no amount of effort will be able to stop it. He believes that what will result is a plateau in total output that will last approximately 15 years followed by decreasing output."

Read the rest of the article at:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/feb/08/saudi-oil-reserves-overstated-wikileaks

Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #223 - Feb 9th, 2011 at 5:11pm
 
Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Feb 9th, 2011 at 4:13pm:
WikiLeaks cables: Saudi Arabia cannot pump enough oil to keep a lid on prices

US diplomat convinced by Saudi expert that reserves of world's biggest oil exporter have been overstated by nearly 40%

The US fears that Saudi Arabia, the world's largest crude oil exporter, may not have enough reserves to prevent oil prices escalating, confidential cables from its embassy in Riyadh show.

The cables, released by WikiLeaks, urge Washington to take seriously a warning from a senior Saudi government oil executive that the kingdom's crude oil reserves may have been overstated by as much as 300bn barrels – nearly 40%.

The revelation comes as the oil price has soared in recent weeks to more than $100 a barrel on global demand and tensions in the Middle East. Many analysts expect that the Saudis and their Opec cartel partners would pump more oil if rising prices threatened to choke off demand.

However, Sadad al-Husseini, a geologist and former head of exploration at the Saudi oil monopoly Aramco, met the US consul general in Riyadh in November 2007 and told the US diplomat that Aramco's 12.5m barrel-a-day capacity needed to keep a lid on prices could not be reached.

According to the cables, which date between 2007-09, Husseini said Saudi Arabia might reach an output of 12m barrels a day in 10 years but before then – possibly as early as 2012 – global oil production would have hit its highest point. This crunch point is known as "peak oil".

Husseini said that at that point Aramco would not be able to stop the rise of global oil prices because the Saudi energy industry had overstated its recoverable reserves to spur foreign investment. He argued that Aramco had badly underestimated the time needed to bring new oil on tap.

One cable said: "According to al-Husseini, the crux of the issue is twofold. First, it is possible that Saudi reserves are not as bountiful as sometimes described, and the timeline for their production not as unrestrained as Aramco and energy optimists would like to portray."

It went on: "In a presentation, Abdallah al-Saif, current Aramco senior vice-president for exploration, reported that Aramco has 716bn barrels of total reserves, of which 51% are recoverable, and that in 20 years Aramco will have 900bn barrels of reserves.

"Al-Husseini disagrees with this analysis, believing Aramco's reserves are overstated by as much as 300bn barrels. In his view once 50% of original proven reserves has been reached … a steady output in decline will ensue and no amount of effort will be able to stop it. He believes that what will result is a plateau in total output that will last approximately 15 years followed by decreasing output."

Read the rest of the article at:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/feb/08/saudi-oil-reserves-overstated-wikileaks


I note the last 2 paragraphs of the article say -
In the last two years, other senior energy analysts have backed Husseini. Fatih Birol, chief economist to the International Energy Agency, told the Guardian last year that conventional crude output could plateau in 2020, a development that was "not good news" for a world still heavily dependent on petroleum.

Jeremy Leggett, convenor of the UK Industry Taskforce on Peak Oil and Energy Security, said: "We are asleep at the wheel here: choosing to ignore a threat to the global economy that is quite as bad as the credit crunch, quite possibly worse."


I agree that it's not good news, but I disagree that conventional crude could plateau in 2020, it already did, starting in 2005!

I also agree with Jeremy Legget, the "Energy Crunch" will be worse than the "Credit Crunch"!


The article also backs up the assertion that none of the players in this game, can be trusted, any further than we can kick them!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Peak Energy Debate
Reply #224 - Feb 9th, 2011 at 8:12pm
 
Saudi Oil Production and Reserves - Reasons Behind Wikileaks Concerns


Saudi Arabia tells us that they have lots of oil, but if we look at graphs of their historical production, there is nothing that looks like an upward trend. In fact, recent production is lower than it was in the late 1970s and early 1980s. This is a graph of Saudi oil production, consumption, and amount of net exports, from Energy Exports Databrowser.

...

Exports, in green, are down because Saudi Arabia is consuming more and more of its own oil, so there is less available for others. This graph doesn't fit well with what we have been told.

The rest of the Middle East claims huge reserves, too, but looking at the Mideast in total doesn't give a much more favorable picture. While production is a bit higher in total now, exports (in green) are down from the 1970s because of rising consumption.

...

It is almost certain that the Saudis are overstating their capabilities. The reserves for Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Middle East are not audited, nor are their supposed "spare production capacities." They may have some spare capacity, but not the amount stated. When oil prices spiked to $147 barrel in July 2008, Saudi Arabia and others in the Middle East increased their production a bit, did not really come through with a huge surge in production, the way one would expect from their suppose spare capacity.

World oil supply has been roughly flat since 2005. Many are concerned that oil production will actually begin to fall in the next year or two - what is referred to as "peak oil" in the Wikileaks cable.

...

Links to other Posts Relating to Overstatement of Saudi Reserves and Production Capability, are provided in the article.

Link -
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/7465
============
A couple of observations -
1) Saudi, Middle East & World Production has been pretty well static since 2005.
2) There is a small, but discernable gap opening up, between Consumption & Production and when (not if) this widens further, that is when the Problems rachet up considerably!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 24
Send Topic Print