Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 ... 117
Send Topic Print
For the Record (Read 201195 times)
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #840 - Jan 1st, 2013 at 1:38pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Dec 28th, 2012 at 11:01am:
great read perceptions,  i look forward to the fiscal cliff post next week



It seems that the Fiscal Cliff has been postponed for two months. Apparently this will coincide with the debt ceiling saga.

So they kick the can down the street a little bit further. I wonder what miracle they are expecting within the next two months?
...............................................................................

The White House and top Republicans have struck a last minute deal to avert huge New Year tax hikes and spending cuts known as the "fiscal cliff"' that had threatened to send the US economy into recession.
The pact, if agreed by Congress, would hand President Barack Obama a victory by hiking tax rates on the wealthy - those earning over $450,000 a year - but exempt everyone else who had been due to see their taxes go up on January 1.

It would also put off $109 billion in budget cuts across the government for two months, but would in the process line up another showdown between Obama's Democrats and Republicans in dysfunctional Washington at the end of February.

Vice President Joe Biden, who negotiated the deal with the top Republican in the Senate Mitch McConnell, was on Capitol Hill to sell it to Democratic senators, some of whom wanted tax hikes to kick in at a lower threshold.
Had no deal been struck, budget experts warned that the fragile US economy could have been sent spinning back into recession by the $500 billion combined whack from spending cuts and tax hikes.


Read more:

http://www.news.com.au/business/fiscal-cliff-disputes-remain-as-deadline-nears/s...
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #841 - Jan 1st, 2013 at 11:11pm
 
The Fiscal Cliff & what it Really means


Background articles follow -
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/01/01/politics/fiscal-cliff/index.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/01/opinion/a-tepid-agreement-on-the-fiscal-cliff....
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2013-01/01/c_132075574.htm
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/us-closes-in-on-budget-deal/story-e6frg...

Essentially there are two choices, for Politicians & Central Bankers in the USA, but also elsewhere, specifically in respect of the so called Fiscal Cliff, but also for Economics in general -

1) Continue to allow Debt to escalate, in an attempt to stimulate Growth, until that one final hair that breaks the camels back or in this case, breaks the entire Global Financial system, including the Global Currency system.

2) Accept that the Economic Status quo of Continuous Growth, is now dying and implement changes to the system, which focuses on Productivity AND which realigns Revenue & Expenditure, to fit the new realities of our changing Global Demographics, Energy Supply & Costs & our changing Global Climate.
     
Irrespective what choice/s may be made initially, in the US regarding the “Fiscal Cliff”, it will become apparent that US Politicians can not fix, that which is already broken and the US Economy will re-enter Recession, as Demand & Consumption again start to slide & the size of that slide will depend on the size of the Debt reduction, the composition of the Revenue & Expenditure changes & the extent to which all of those changes go towards lifting real Productivity or whether the changes are merely cosmetic. 

The real dilemma in the US, as it was & is, in Japan & largely is & will continue to be, in Europe, is that Growth will not return, as it has done in almost all other Economic downturns in the modern Economic era, because certain major Economic drivers are now in the process of reversing AND therefore the tried & tested remedies of Stimulation &/or AUS-terity will also be to no avail!

There are a number of factors why Growth will not return, BUT the major factors are –
1) Baby Boomer Demographics
The Boomers are the largest cohort in US (around 80 million) & Global (1.75-2 Billion) history and they have already commenced a lengthy process aimed at achieving maximum possible Retirement assets, with which to fund Retirement, before moving to a much more frugal lifestyle and then finally leaving us forever over the next 20-30 years.


This would “normally” have severely reduced Demand on a large range of Products & Services, given the massive size of the Boomers generation. However, the circumstances now faced by the Baby Boomers and following generations, are far from normal!

Whilst many were set to rely on Government Pensions, they may now find those Pensions have NOT been funded by past Taxes AND any reasonable Pensions may be difficult to maintain, given the likely downward trend, of the Worker to None Worker participation rates in the US & Globally, as can already be seen in some European countries, such as Greece. 

Many others, thought they had acquired enough assets, to fund their own Private Retirement Superannuation, BUT the initial phase of the GFC took a BIG bite out of those assets, primarily in the Shares & in some countries already, in the Real Estate markets.

Many, may still have thought they would have enough, by relying on a reasonable return on their investments, however those investment returns are now heading down or already at rock bottom & they will remain very low for quite some time, due to problems funding the US Debt & other countries with large Debts.

AND, of course, the entire Boomer Retirement process actually requires removing very large amounts OUT OF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM, TO PAY FOR THE BOOMERS TO LIVE, thus providing another downgrade to Growth in the Financial system.

However, by far the greatest impact is saved, for WHEN THE BOOMERS START LEAVING US, IN INCREASING NUMBERS & DEMAND & CONSUMPTION START TO CRASH, BIG TIME, AS THE TOTAL POPULATION ACTUALLY GOES INTO DECLINE, WITH BIRTH RATES IN SERIOUS DECLINE & THE DEATH RATE (owing partially to Boomers), RISING SUBSTANTIALLY!

In fact, that deterioration, because of the aging of the population has already started. It started, as the Baby Boomer Boom ended around 2006, as Global Birth rates continued to Decline and the largest generation in human history (Baby Boomers) also started going into its pre-retirement saving mode, it then moved onto a much more Frugal Spending mode and into actual Retirement, for which the first of the “official” Boomer retirements started on January 1st, 2011.
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/in-2011-the-baby-boomers-start-to-turn...
The final act of this Drama, will see Boomers leaving us forever, in increasing numbers, over the next 20-30 years, which will likely send the Global Population into actual Decline, THUS DRAMATICALLY REDUCING GLOBAL ECONOMIC DEMAND, CONSUMPTION & GROWTH!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #842 - Jan 1st, 2013 at 11:12pm
 
The Fiscal Cliff & what it Really means (Cont)


As part of this process, the Boomer generation will impose massive additional costs in areas relating to -
1) Removing massive savings from the financial system (both Government & Private), to fund their retirement.

2) Massive addition Pension costs, which Governments will have to bear, at a time when the worker to non worker ratio has slumped from about 8/1 in 1950, to about 2/1 in 2040, THUS drastically overloading the call on current workers to pay more taxes.

3) Massive additional costs to the Health Care system, which will struggle to provide the number of qualified Health Care workers &/or the funding required for the rapidly aging & consequently less healthy Boomers.

So, to say that this time is different is a gross understatement, just due to Demographics, BUT there are also other major factors that are also coming to play.

2) Declining EROEI on Energy
Whilst Global Demographic issues are raging, there are also other dilemma's, primary of which is the Declining EROEI (Energy Return On Energy Invested), which has been falling for quite some time, BUT that Decline has escalated seriously over the last decade or so.

Both Crude Oil & Coal are steadily moving towards a higher cost per capita & a lower EROEI, with Production costs rising, whilst the NET Energy Produced is in serious Decline.

Other forms of Energy have come under consideration & that situation will continue to evolve. However, one of the primary candidates, particularly for base load Energy production, has recently taken a hammering to its reputation & Nuclear Energy is likely to take some time to recover, if indeed that is possible, after the Japanese Tsunami experience in March 2011.   
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster

Other Non-Conventional Energy, such as Shale Oil/Gas or Tar Sands may provide some assistance, BUT their EROEI is much lower than the old Conventional Oil, therefore the costs will be much higher AND their Production in sufficient volume, to replace the old Conventional Oil Product is in great doubt!   

The overall effect from an Energy perspective is that Energy Costs will continue to rise in the longer term, after a short Decline owing to the immediate effects of the returning GFC. Those longer term Cost increases mean that CONSUMER DISPOSABLE INCOME WILL CONTINUE TO DECLINE FOR QUITE SOME TIME, thus seriously stressing Consumer Demand & Consumption!

3) Climate Change
The last of the major factors why Growth will not return is that our relative benign Climate conditions are ending, as both nature & Humanity push towards the Peak of the current Global warming trend. 

There is a great deal of argument over whether our current Climate Change is caused by man or simply part of the planets long term trend, BUT frankly that is largely irrelevant, as change is upon us & it is impacting already, to some extent, on Agricultural Production, which is again causing lower Production in some Agricultural Products and Cost increases, which again will lessen the Public Disposable Income.

BUT, more importantly, it will also cause Food & Fresh Water shortages, which will impact severely on those who can least avoid it and cause the Death rate to rise sharply in many third world countries.


That said, I believe that the argument/s put by the bulk of Scientists, particularly those who specialise in the Climate area, are likely to be found to be largely correct, that we (humans) are hastening the natural cycle AND therefore, we should take any & all measures possible, to mitigate against the worse likely outcomes, as some of those worst outcomes could change everything!      
Now, I have said all of that, to simply to validate why I now say this –
Economic Growth can not return to the usual Status quo and we need a new game plan, as the rules of the game, indeed the game itself, has changed!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #843 - Jan 1st, 2013 at 11:13pm
 
The Fiscal Cliff & what it Really means (Cont)


So, as I said earlier, irrespective what choice/s may be made initially, in the US regarding the “Fiscal Cliff”, it will not change the final outcome and the real dilemma is that no matter what decision/s there may be, Growth can not return.

In other words, IF US Politicians & those elsewhere, only take small steps to increase Tax & Reduce Expenditure, THEN they will allow Debt to continue to escalate quickly, they will also prevent any return to “normal” interest rates, any time soon.

At some point, in the not too distant future, expanding US & Global Debt levels would trigger a collapse in the Economic house of cards, including the US currency system, notwithstanding that the US$ is currently the World Reserve currency and that would send the US & Global Economy into a serious Depression, with Markets performing accordingly.


However, the alternative is that, IF US Politicians & those elsewhere, take wide & sweeping measures, to increase Tax & Reduce Expenditure, to allow Debt to try to return to “normal” levels, within say a decade, THEN they would need to run at levels roughly equating to a balanced budget, for each of the next 10 years.

In the case of the US that would mean a turnaround of around $1 Trillion in 2013 alone and something similar for each of the next 10 years.

The net effect of those sorts of measures, plus the knock on effects, would dramatically impact DEMAND, CONSUMPTION & GROWTH. That would see a Decline in US GDP of something around 6-7% during 2013, something similar in the years ahead and that would send the US & Global Economy into a serious Depression, with Markets performing accordingly.


So, as I said earlier, whatever the initial choice/s may be made regarding this “fiscal cliff”, the likely end results, will be very, very similar, unless the Politicians wake up to the fact that they are now in an entire new game AND the Politicians need to start playing according to the new rules, which is going to mean a LOT MORE REAL CO-OPERATION & A LOT MORE SELECTIVITY IN HOW TO ACHIEVE HIGHER PRODUCTIVITY & HOW TO BEST PERFORM IN A LOW, NO OR NEGATIVE, GROWTH ECONOMY.   

Whatever the initial market reactions will be, to what is eventually passed, if anything is passed, by both the US Senate & Congress, will depend on the markets perceptions of what is announced AND that could range from a large gain, to a large fall, BUT irrespective of what those initial reactions may be, the actual outcomes during 2013-2014 are likely to see very significant Share & R/E Declines & very significant Declines in Economic activity, not just in the USA, but Globally.

In fact, IF these cretin Politicians had conspired amongst themselves, over these past 3-4 decades, THEY COULD NOT HAVE ARRIVED AT A BETTER LAID PLAN & TIMING, IF THEIR INTENTION WAS TO CRIPPLE THE US & GLOBAL ECONOMY!!!


So, I wish you all Good Luck and to all of you I say, watch the Debt, Grow!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #844 - Jan 9th, 2013 at 8:23am
 
OZ$ back above $1.05 against US$ -
http://au.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=AUDUSD=X&t=5y&l=on&z=l&q=l&c=

Despite US$ index being back above $0.80 -
http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/DXY

At some point, the US$ will collapse, due to the weight of US Debt and the OZ$ will then spike higher against the US$.

We will also rise against the Euro, as Europe continues its woes.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #845 - Jan 10th, 2013 at 9:38pm
 
perceptions_now wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 8:23am:
OZ$ back above $1.05 against US$ -
http://au.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=AUDUSD=X&t=5y&l=on&z=l&q=l&c=

Despite US$ index being back above $0.80 -
http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/DXY

At some point, the US$ will collapse, due to the weight of US Debt and the OZ$ will then spike higher against the US$.

We will also rise against the Euro, as Europe continues its woes.



Just for interest, the OZ$ is now closing in on $1.06, against the US$ -
http://au.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=AUDUSD=X&t=1d&l=on&z=l&q=l&c=
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #846 - Jan 10th, 2013 at 9:54pm
 
A Brief History Of U.S. Dollar Debasement


On the 100th anniversary of the creation of the Federal Reserve, it seems fitting that we should present a brief history of US dollar debasement:

1787: U.S. Constitution ratified. "No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts."

1792: U.S. Coinage Act ratified. Our first Coinage Act establishes a uniform standard of gold and silver content of U.S. coins, paving the way for over a century of trust in the U.S. dollar that will ultimately catapult the U.S. to world economic supremacy.

1861: Greenbacks and Greybacks: In desperation and in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution, both the north and south issue paper currency with no gold or silver backing. Following the war, the U.S. returns to its constitutional roots, ceasing production of Greenbacks and making efforts to retire them as the U.S. returns to the gold standard. A first-class postage stamp (introduced in 1863) costs two cents.

1913: Creation of the Fed: In the belief that a central bank will prevent future economic panics, the U.S. government forms a banking cartel called the Federal Reserve, a rather facetious name given that the Fed is not federal and it maintains no reserves.
In so doing our government ignores the warning of Thomas Jefferson:


If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.


The stage is now set for the collapse of the dollar. A first-class postage stamp still costs two cents.

1934: Gold Reserve Act: After 23 years of dollar debasement by the Fed, Franklin Roosevelt is forced to acknowledge the growing disparity between the century-old fixed price of gold ($20.67/oz.) and its market price. The rift is made painfully obvious by the outflow of U.S. gold into the coffers of foreign nations redeeming dollars for gold at the stated fixed price. In direct violation of the U.S. Constitution, Roosevelt and Congress not only remove gold from circulation but prohibit ownership of gold by U.S. citizens. With the stroke of a pen the dollar is devalued from $20.67/oz. to $35/oz. Despite massive improvements in delivery efficiency, a first-class postage stamp now costs three cents.

1944: Bretton Woods: In the belief that the world requires a unified monetary standard in order to eliminate trade wars that ultimately lead to shooting wars, leading nations establish a dollar-based monetary system in which currencies are valued in terms of the U.S. dollar, which still claims to be gold-backed. This unwarranted trust ironically gives the U.S. yet more license and incentive to continue its debasement, since the world's citizens now accept newly printed dollars with the mistaken notion that they can be redeemed for a fixed amount of gold. A first-class postage stamp still costs three cents.

1965: Second Coinage Act. In order to finance two very expensive initiatives (the Vietnam War and moon walking) and in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution, Lyndon Johnson signs a new Coinage Act that removes all silver content from U.S. coins.
Despite incredible improvements in delivery efficiency that should have dropped the price astronomically, a first-class postage stamp now costs five cents.

1971-75:
Petrodollars replace the gold standard:
In a repetition of the 1934 crisis, the U.S. gold supply is being decimated by foreign governments redeeming dollars for gold at the stated fixed price ($35/oz.), a completely untenable ratio after thirty more years of dollar debasement by the Fed. In direct violation of the U.S. Constitution, Richard Nixon and the Congress once again stop the outflow, but this time rather than set a new unmaintainable fixed rate they simply eliminate the fixed dollar/gold ratio.
Realizing that the collapse of the gold standard will dramatically reduce demand for dollars worldwide, Nixon strikes a deal with OPEC: trade oil in dollars only in return for perpetual U.S. military support.
By 1974 gold is irrelevant to the U.S. hegemony, and so as his final act of the year Gerald Ford signs a bill that once again allows U.S. citizens to own gold. The first-class postage stamp now costs ten cents.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #847 - Jan 10th, 2013 at 10:31pm
 
A Brief History Of U.S. Dollar Debasement (Cont)


2000:
Iraq threatens the petrodollar: Shortly after the creation of the Euro, Saddam Hussein makes Iraq the first major oil exporting country to sell oil in a currency other than the dollar, thereby threatening the global petrodollar arrangement.

Citing this "weapon of mass destruction" while misleading the public into a preposterous belief that he is really referring to conventional weapons that could somehow threaten the U.S., George W. Bush reacts swiftly by invading in 2003 and quickly reverting Iraq to dollar sales. To make our point exceptionally clear to world leaders, the U.S. (using proxies) hunts down Hussein and executes him in 2006. The first-class postage stamp now costs 33 cents.

2008:
Beginning of the end: Under Barack Obama, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke begins a series of bailouts of banks (that are presumably Fed members) and of U.S. debt (both mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasurys).
The first-class postage stamp now sells for 42 cents.


2013:
100th Anniversary: The master of dollar-printing is 100 years old. The Fed marks its birthday by engaging in the largest debt purchase program in history ($40 billion of mortgage-backed securities and $45 billion of Treasurys per month).

Awaiting the collapse of the petrodollar arrangement and the subsequent radical reduction in the purchasing power of the dollar, the price of gold is bid up to over $1600 per ounce.
And despite the fact that humans now expend a tiny fraction of the effort to deliver a letter in 2013 compared to what was required in 1863, the price of a first-class stamp is now 46 cents.


Technically the U.S. left the gold standard in 1971, but in reality we abandoned it in 1913 with the creation of the Fed. The two publicly visible gold-standard slippages of the past century (FDR's repricing and Nixon's cancellation) were merely necessary adjustments following decades of gradually increasing gold-price inconsistency caused by continuous inflation. Given this, it seems hard to imagine that the Fed was created for any purpose other to create this inflation, i.e. to effectively raise our taxes under the table.

This has enormous implications for today's long-term investor. Our most constant and predictable financial reality is the continued inflationary policy of the Fed. Given this, and assuming the U.S. is unlikely to pull another rabbit out of the global hat as Nixon and Ford did with the petrodollar in the early 70s,
the dollar will almost certainly continue losing purchasing power indefinitely, in terms of both commodities and other currencies. And when the oil-producing nations finally agree to accept payment in currencies other than the dollar, expect a precipitous drop. Invest accordingly.


Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1100331-a-brief-history-of-u-s-dollar-debasement...
=================================
As I said previously, ALL ACTIONS & INACTIONS, HAVE CONSEQUENCES!

Given the apparent path of US Politicians & the Federal Reserve, it appears that US Debt will continue to spiral ever upwards, in the years ahead AND that the Federal Reserve will take a larger & larger slice of the US Debt pie, as "Foreigners" such as China, shortly Japan (who also have enormous problems) & others, reduce their support, as they see the US Economy & the US$ value both heading for collapse!

Citing time frames is always fraught with difficulty, however I think it is likely that China, Russia will lead OPEC & in particular Iran, into a cessation of the US Petro$ trade & whenever that actually happens, it will be the final nail in the US$ coffin.

In any event, when that final arrives, the US$ will Devalue significantly, thus driving up US inflation, as the cost of everything imported soars higher & higher, THUS also forcing US Debt higher.

As I said, the when is very difficult, BUT given current trends and allowing time for some players, such as China, to back out of their past  support of US Treasury Debt, THEN we may have between 2-6 years left, before the end games start in earnest.

That said, it does not mean there won't be lots of games played, before those end games start, because there will be.

In fact, we have already been heavily involved in some of those games, for quite some time, already.

So, Good Luck & watch the Debt, rise!

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir_Bobby
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 174
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #848 - Jan 10th, 2013 at 10:48pm
 
Hi Perceptions,
then again - the USA can just keep printing money & pay their debts that way.

The problem may be that foreign countries will use that money to
buy up American companies & property so that the USA is owned
by the rest of the world - including a large chunk by China.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #849 - Jan 10th, 2013 at 10:58pm
 
Sir_Bobby wrote on Jan 10th, 2013 at 10:48pm:
Hi Perceptions,
then again - the USA can just keep printing money & pay their debts that way.

The problem may be that foreign countries will use that money to
buy up American companies & property so that the USA is owned
by the rest of the world - including a large chunk by China.


No Bobby!

As I said, all actions & inactions, have consequences & one of the consequences of current US government & Fed Reserve policy, is that other countries know that a US$ devaluation is coming AND some countries, China in particular are already looking to back out of supporting US Debt.

So, at some point, the music stops and those who haven't moved close enough to the safety chairs will be severely damaged!

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #850 - Jan 10th, 2013 at 11:17pm
 
Stagflation: Coming Soon To A Market Near You


Prudent investors should start to plan now for the increasing inflation and continued slow economic/job growth coming down the pipeline. In this article, I will refute two of most common arguments made against the prospect of stagflation. I will then chronicle how we got into this position by the decisions of shortsighted central bankers and poor policy decisions by political leadership. Finally, I will offer some suggestions on how one can position their portfolio to take advantage and prosper by the return of stagflation.

The two common arguments I get against my thesis of the coming onset of stagflation are that the stock market is doing just fine despite the financial crisis of the past five years and the other is that if inflation is due to escalate why are government debt yields so low? Let's tackle both individually. First, I believe the liquidity engineered by the Federal Reserve has already led to asset inflation and will eventually find other aspects of the economy. Yes, stocks are back to where they were five years ago and the stock market has had a great run over the past couple of years. However, that is only if one prices the market in a paper currency like dollars. If you look at the market trajectory priced in more traditional (and less manipulated) stores of value like silver & gold, the market is selling at half what it was in 2007.

Second, one of the primary reasons government bond yields are so low is that the Federal Reserve is buying the vast majority of new Treasury debt. One should find it ironic as well as insightful that the current Fed program of buying $85B a month in government debt and mortgage securities adds up almost perfectly to the $1T deficits Washington is running up annually.

Imagine a highly probable scenario where our debt rises to $20T by 2016 and the interest rate we need to pay on that debt rises to a more traditional 4% to 5%. The annual amount of interest the United States will need to pay on its growing deficit will increase by $400B to $600B on an annual basis. Think of the ramifications for the budget, taxes and the future course of the country.

The two components of stagflation are increasing inflation that is almost always the result of poor monetary policy and a fiscal policy that results in slow or no economic and job growth.

On the political/fiscal policy front lay the other driver towards our future of stagflation. None of the major players has acquitted itself well. The Republicans have not been able to control the narrative so that necessary spending and entitlement cuts come to the forefront (Tax revenue is down only 3% since 2007, government spending is up some 35% over the same timeframe). The president and the democrats have managed to do a successful job of keeping the conversation around the need for the top 2% to pay their '"fair share", but the $60B annually they got in the recently passed fiscal cliff deal does little to reduce debt in lieu of trillion dollar annual deficits.

One thing I think that has not been highlighted enough is why the unemployment rate has fallen over the past few years. Almost the entire decrease is explained by decline in labor force participation over the last four years (See chart). Some of this is explained by the baby boomers retiring, but the majority of the decrease consists of people dropping out of the workforce and either going on disability, on the government dole or for a small subset; back to school mainly on government loans. None of this does much for the long term well-being of these workforce dropouts, our budget or the overall economic growth rate of the country in the future.
...

In summary, we have a huge and growing deficit with no will to tackle the real causes of the huge increase of our national debt. The Federal Reserve has already tripled its balance sheet and is on a path to quadruple it by year end.

Finally, our recent fiscal policies have made it more expensive to run a business and hire, while decreasing the incentive to work.  Not exactly a recipe for robust job growth.

So where does that leave us? It seems we will not address the core causes of our deficit and we cannot expand the Federal Reserve's balance sheet forever.

We certainly cannot grow our way out of our problems with the 4% to 6% annual GDP growth that would be normal coming off a deep contraction with current fiscal policies.
That leaves the one avenue all major debtor nations eventually take, try to debase your currency and inflate your way out of your debt.
This always results in much higher inflation. Combined with continued low economic/job growth gives you stagflation which has not been in the general lexicon since Jimmy Carter's presidency.

Be careful out there.

Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1100781-stagflation-coming-soon-to-a-market-near...
===============================
Ring any bells???

Btw, I would suggest that the Baby Boomer Demographic may be attributing much more to the lower participation rate, than the author has given credit for.

Good Luck & watch the Debt, Rise!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #851 - Jan 13th, 2013 at 10:54am
 
...

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #852 - Jan 16th, 2013 at 11:06am
 
'Retiring' The Debt: Spain Drains Pension Fund To Prop Up Bonds


Last week, Spain's Treasury raised $5.82 billion euros at auction in the country's first debt sale of the year; this was well above even the upper end of the target range.

The consensus, which of course is somewhat justifiable, is that the successful auction indicates demand for Spanish debt isn't going to dry up anytime in the very near future.


The problem for Spain in 2013, however, is that two major sources of demand for the country's debt are likely to be largely unavailable in the coming year.
In a rather disconcerting piece published on January 3, the Wall Street Journal disclosed that Spain has now spent over 90% of its Social Security Reserve Fund buying its own debt.
Just to reiterate: Spain has spent pretty much the entirety of its pension fund on its own bonds.


There are three obvious problems here.

First, this means that the fate of pensions in Spain is now hopelessly intertwined with the fate of Spanish government bonds, a fact that doesn't inspire much confidence
, given the market for periphery sovereign debt in 2012.

The second issue involves the contention made by the Spanish government that the practice of betting the pension fund on Spanish government bonds is sustainable as long as Spain retains market access. It is inconceivable that anyone in a position of authority could miss the obvious contradiction here. Were it not for the purchases made from the Social Security Reserve Fund, Spain might have lost market access last year. So to say that this practice is sustainable as long as Spain retains market access is basically a tautology. That is, if Spain depends on the pension fund for market access, then the pension fund cannot depend on that same market access - that is circular reasoning at its worst.

Third, if 90% of the Social Security Reserve Fund has already been invested in Spanish government bonds, there can't be much left to invest.
It is conceivable then, that demand for Spanish bonds will suffer in 2013 given that the pension fund's hands are now tied.

[b]This problem could be complicated by the fact that Spain's banks already own some two-thirds of all Spanish government debt outstanding, meaning they aren't likely to step up to the plate either. In other words, foreign demand needs to rebound, a speculative proposition at best.[/b]

Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1110051-retiring-the-debt-spain-drains-pension-f...
================================
This reeks of Japanese Deja vu!
...

In both cases, the vast majority of National Debt is held within their own country, which means that when that source runs out, which it will, THEN that will be the end of them, NO ONE ELSE WILL TOUCH THEM, as they have nothing left to back their Debt! These countries will roll over & die! In reality, they will self implode!

There seems no end to Politicians believing in "can kicking" and that, apparently, IF it doesn't happen on their watch, THEN everything is ok???

Unbelievable, absolutely unbelievable!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #853 - Jan 26th, 2013 at 10:49pm
 
The Other Lance Armstrongs


Everybody's racing to the bottom these days, including central bankers.

Everybody does it. That feeble excuse, heard by every parent of an adolescent at some point, was the best Lance Armstrong could conjure for taking banned performance-enhancing drugs. It simply wouldn't have been possible to win the Tour de France seven consecutive times without being juiced with various substances, he admitted in his hyped interview last week with Oprah Winfrey (which also gave her languishing OWN network a much-needed shot in the arm).

That everybody does it doesn't make it right, as every parent of an adolescent also invariably responds.

Among central bankers, however, that everybody is doing it apparently constitutes sufficient reason to join in the global money-printing surge. Without injecting their economies with monetary steroids on a massive and continual basis, like Lance Armstrong, they think there is no way they can compete internationally against other countries that are doing it, too.

The latest to join the juicing spree has been the Bank of Japan, with the prodding of the newly elected Liberal Democratic Party government led by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, which was swept back into power on a platform to cheapen the yen and replace the two past decades of deflation with outright inflation.

"Had the dollar not incurred a deep slide against major foreign currencies, what remains the weakest U.S. economic recovery since the Great Depression would have been even feebler," he writes in the firm's research weekly.

The cheap dollar owes much to the Federal Reserve's successive rounds of quantitative easing, the polite term for the central bank's buying of bonds with money created out of thin air. The Fed's current policy—let's call it QE-4ever—consists of buying a combined total of $85 billion Treasury and agency securities per month, which is close enough to a cool $1 trillion a year for government work. And by Lonski's reckoning, the dollar is down by 17% against a broad range of currencies compared with the 2002-07 recovery and off nearly 50% from its record high of 1985.


Here in the U.S. of A., she explains, money-printing "causes a serious divide between consumers and biz. John Q. gets crumbs in the form of miserable wage growth. Biz gets all the capital it needs/wants. So far, they're gettin' away with this screaming imbalance. But as the gap between the two widens, at a point, will come a day of reckoning.

Another danger of steroids is the urge to retaliate against anybody who crosses you, which extends to the currency arena. U.S. auto makers, which have enjoyed the benefits of a cheap dollar that has helped their resurgence, last week complained about the yen's sharp drop, just as Brazil objected to the U.S. policies. Meanwhile, the euro—which has surged past $1.35 from a low around $1.20 last July and even more against the yen—looks like the one who isn't going along with the crowd

What everybody's doing is racing to the bottom, which doesn't make it right.

THE STOCK MARKET, as noted, continues to be the major beneficiary of the flood of liquidity pumped in by central banks.

The Dow industrials gained 1.2% on the week, while the S&P 500 tacked on 1%, putting the gauges at five-year highs. Chalk this up to the TINA factor, writes Jason Trennert, head of Strategas Research Partners, as in There Is No Alternative to stocks in a world of emaciated interest rates, suppressed volatility (the CBOE Volatility Index, aka the VIX, ended the week at 12.40, a somnambulant reading not seen since 2007, before the crisis hit), and with short interest at similarly suppressed levels.

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052748703596604578235580880655900.ht...
=============================
In the normal course of events & at almost any other period in the modern Economic times, these sorts of actions could have been taken AND after a relatively short period of time, Demographics would have ensured that Demand returned & inflation would have ensured that the accrued Debt would have been relegated to a much more acceptable Debt to GDP ratio.

On this occasion, Demographics is guaranteed to head South, THUS removing the major Economic rebound driver of Demand!

At some point, recognition we come that "monetisation" alone can not & will not, restore Demand, nor will it restore an acceptable Debt to GDP ratio. However, by the time that inflection point is reached, it will be too late, most of the major currencies will certainly be involved in a desperate race to the bottom & Debt will explode beyond any & all, redemption! Inflation will kick in, BUT not the sort that will fix things. In some countries, such as the US, Japan & some in Europe, it will lead to runaway inflation & a spiralling cost of everything imported.

The can kickers will not want that on their watch & they will try anything & everything to avoid it, BUT the time will come. The timing of that event is extraordinarily difficult, as some of the most powerful Politicians & TPTB will be pulling in one direction, BUT there are also a relatively small, BUT quite well placed influential blocks, who will happily be trying to resist AND therefore the timing & speed of collapse, IS LIKELY TO BE BREATH TAKING, when it happens!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #854 - Jan 27th, 2013 at 11:06am
 
New-Home Sales: US


The following chart shows the extent of sales decline to date.
http://www.blytic.com/Player.aspx?key=a53771ce1d1c44edb719773957a82929

It's important to recognize that the inventory of new homes appears to now be bouncing around a very low 151K units. That's near the lowest level seen in in at least 47 years, while the median number of months for sale has improved to 4.6.
http://www.blytic.com/Player.aspx?key=28985&roottype=release&rootid=65

Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1133741-new-home-sales-december-2012?source=emai...
===============================
US New Single Family Home Sales Peaked in 2005 and have since Declined by a massive 73%, as at the end of December, 2012.

This is in line with likely Demographic trends, given that the Baby Boomer generation Peaked in 1956 & the Peak age for Earning & Spending is 50 years old, which means 2006 was roughly the cut off point, for Peak Global Earning & Spending 



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 ... 117
Send Topic Print