Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 ... 117
Send Topic Print
For the Record (Read 199853 times)
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #945 - Sep 28th, 2013 at 8:18pm
 
Demographics That Slammed Economy In 2008 Now Poised To Slam Stocks (Cont)


Waiting For Wave of Selling

During retirement people tend to lighten up on equities. Some get out of equities all together. What may be the trillion dollar question is when the first leg of the baby boom generation will sell the most stock. The chart below takes a stab at answering.

...


Currently the best correlation suggests that at age 67 they will sell. That's 67 or age 50 with a 17 year lead time. It further suggests the selling should have already started. The black line in the chart above is the S&P 500 adjusted for inflation. Looking at the market this way we appear to be in a secular bear market that started in 2000 with a series of lower tops and lower bottoms. The 2007 top was lower than 2000, and currently the real price is 2.3% below the 2007 top. The 2009 bottom was lower than the 2003 bottom.

Are we about to experience the largest share of the population to ever enter the peak age of selling stock? I can't get too excited about the chart indicating the selling should have started a couple of months ago. Two years ago the strongest correlation suggested the peak age of selling was 65 and a half. This bull market (or up leg in the secular bear as the case may be) has shifted the lead time for maximizing the correlation 18 months. If two years of rising markets can shift the lead time that much it casts some doubt on the meaning of the correlation. While I still expect a huge wave of selling from the baby boom generation, it may not come until something else breaks the upward momentum of stocks. Baby boomers may be willing to let it ride as long as they can.

On the other hand, the selling may have begun and we just don't see it because our measuring stick is shrinking. Priced in euros our market peaked back in May. Priced in pounds it peaked on August 1. On the Wednesday, the Fed announced no taper and stocks went up about 1%, the trade weighted dollar index fell 1%. So, there was no gain for non dollar observers.

After years of being told we were the "cleanest dirty shirt in the laundry hamper" foreign stock markets have outperformed the U.S. market the last few months and from a non dollar perspective it looks like our market could have topped and be headed down. Even so, the big wave of selling I have been expecting the last year and a half has not started, yet. We are still dancing on the edge of a value cliff.

Value Cliff
In the last 20 years stock valuations according to the PEses that I use are about twice as high as they averaged in the 120 years prior to that. This article has more info on the PEses. Currently, the PEses is just above the average of the last 20 years. So if the last 20 years are the new normal we are near normal and there is little to worry about.

...

What if the last 20 years were an aberration that is about to end? As I see it the last 20 years were largely a demographic phenomenon. The birth dearth of the Great Depression went through the peak years of selling stocks while the baby boom generation went through the peak years of buying and holding stock. So an unusually small group of sellers combined with the biggest ever group of buyers pushed prices and valuations to unheard of levels.

The Depression babies are long past the age of selling stock. The tail end of the baby boom is still buying stock, but they are being displaced by the birth dearth of the 1970s. So the number of people reaching the peak age of buying stock has been in decline for several years and will continue declining for several more. The baby boom while buying less stock remains in the age of holding it. Perhaps the only thing holding valuations at twice the normal level is that baby boomers have not reached the period of selling.

One Catalyst Away
Anything that spooks 67-year olds could tip off the biggest selling spree in history. We are perhaps one catalyst away from starting the third and most destructive down leg of the secular bear market. The catalyst might be a government shutdown, a weak jobs number, a stock price rally that falls short of a new high or dozens of other events. I expect the next leg of the bear market to take the PEses down to the 11 it hit in 1982, or perhaps even the 7 it hit in 1932. Once we hit a low valuation like an 11 or especially a 7 the market will be in position to start a real secular bull market like ones that started in 1920, 1949 and 1982.

For now, the economy faces a demographic headwind that means it is weaker than many indicators like initial claims suggest. The stock market (SPY) faces a demographic cliff.

Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1714962-demographics-that-slammed-economy-in-200...
==========================================
We should bear in mind that Demographics is but one of the major factors now driving Global Economics and there are also other factors influencing events.

So, whilst I concur that Demographics are certainly the major player, there are also other factors, which are muddying the Economic waters and the overall effects are making the timing of events "somewhat" difficult to gauge. 

Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 28th, 2013 at 11:31pm by perceptions_now »  
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #946 - Sep 29th, 2013 at 11:06pm
 
House OKs budget delaying Obamacare; shutdown likely


Washington (AFP) - The US House approved early Sunday a Republican plan that keeps the government open, but its attempt to delay President Barack Obama's health care law means the measure is likely dead on arrival.

The measure still needs approval in the Senate, where Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid said it will be rejected.

The House vote brings the federal government dramatically closer to its first shutdown in 17 years.

Barely two days before a shutdown deadline, Republican leaders set off a political firestorm when they announced Saturday that their stopgap federal spending bill aims to delay implementation of so-called Obamacare by one year.

The White House sharply rebuked the move, and warned it was a step toward shuttering federal agencies once the fiscal year ends Monday night.

It also vowed to veto any such bill. Both chambers would need a two-third majority vote to override a presidential veto, which is close to impossible given the current political breakdown on Capitol Hill.

Given the Senate's likely rejection of the House bill in the waning hours of the fiscal year, a Republican aide acknowledged that a temporary shutdown was the likeliest scenario.

House Democrats, a minority force and largely powerless to prevent passage of Republican legislation, worried that the US government would suffer the same fate as a Washington deadlock in late 1995 that resulted in a 21-day work stop.

Congress now has less than 48 hours to strike a deal that keeps government open, but the ping-ponging of legislation is making that unlikely.

As if anticipating a possible shutdown, House Republicans introduced a separate measure that would ensure US troops get paid in the event of a work stop.

The measure passed unanimously.

Link -
http://news.yahoo.com/republicans-plot-unified-position-shutdown-crisis-17110431...
==========================================
These US Political cretins, are much like our OZ Political cretins, they are most interested in themselves, their Political backers & their own short term self-interests.

The Public & the Public longer term interests, are a long way from the prime considerations of any of these US Politician cretins & the same applies with our bunch of Politician cretins in OZ! 

That said, the nellies may start to get nervous again, in Share Markets, in anticipation of this US mess dragging on, for a longer period than currently anticipated?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #947 - Sep 30th, 2013 at 11:50pm
 
The Nellies may well be getting Nervous, But the fat lady is not yet about to sing!
http://www.investing.com/indices/major-indices

Technically, the $16.699 trillion debt ceiling was hit on 19 May. The US Treasury has been using extraordinary measures to keep going. If Congress doesn't raise the so-called "debt ceiling", then the Treasury estimates that it can only stretch out the money until 17 October. At which point, it could run out of money to pay the interest on US government debt, and the US defaults in a technical sense if it misses an interest payment.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24329706
=========================================
Both sides of US Politics are playing games!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #948 - Oct 1st, 2013 at 7:06am
 

Is the deck of cards ready to collapse?

Will this be the feather that breaks the camels back, so to speak?

What happens if they have no limit to the debt ceiling? Can they even do that?

Limitless ceiling? US debt doomsday approaches

Regardless of the depth of the US debt abyss, the country has never officially violated its ‘debt ceiling’, that’s been in place for almost a century. And that’s simply because the country’s policymakers have always raised the affordable limitations, insisting it was legal.

“The United States can pay any debt it has, because we can always print money to do that. So there is zero probability of default,” Alan Greenspan said on NBC's ‘Meet the Press’ in August.

http://rt.com/business/us-debt-ceiling-default-384/
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #949 - Oct 1st, 2013 at 3:13pm
 

SHUT IT DOWN: White House orders Government to close


A government shutdown: What could it look like?

In remarks Monday, President Barack Obama said children, seniors, and women would be "hamstrung" if the government were to shut down.

"The shutdown will have a very real impact on real people right away," he said.

What happens next?

President Obama has addressed the military to tell them he will work to reopen the government as soon as possible.
In a three-minute video in which there was no mention of Republicans, Obama said Congress has not fulfilled its repsonsiblity.

"It has failed to pass a budget and, as a result, much of our government must now shut down until Congress funds it again," he said.
House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, responded: "The American people don't want a shutdown and neither do I," he said. Yet, he added, the new health care law "is having a devastating impact. ... Something has to be done."


Read more:

http://www.news.com.au/business/markets/what-happens-if-the-us-government-shuts-...


Is it a stunt?

I suppose the impact will depend on the length of time it's shut down for.

Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #950 - Oct 7th, 2013 at 1:23pm
 
Portugal’s brain drain

Video
http://video.ft.com/2658893392001/Portugal-s-brain-drain/World

How long will it be, before those countries spending a fortune educating their young in specialty areas, such as Health (Doctors, Nurses etc) & Engineering come to the conclusion that they either demand that these graduates stay on in their home country for a lengthy period OR they stop educating them and wasting their money?

THE CONUNDRUM
The Conundrum is that "sustained Economic Growth will resolve their Economic Problems & only strong Growth will bring back their educated youth, BUT WITH AN AGING DEMOGRAPHIC & A FERTILITY RATE IN DECLINE, ECONOMIC GROWTH IS SET TO GO LOWER, NOT HIGHER, AS DEMAND DECREASES FURTHER!

Btw, this Aging & Fertility Conundrum, is Global!



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #951 - Oct 7th, 2013 at 5:48pm
 
World is waking, after weekend slumber!


Asian markets were generally down today, around 1%, except China which rose slightly.
European markets are now down, generally about 1%.
http://www.investing.com/indices/major-indices

US Futures are currently off about 130 points, which is just under 1%.
http://www.investing.com/indices/us-30-futures-advanced-chart

At the moment, the longer the "game of chicken" goes for, in the US, the more possible it is for those facing off to make errors of judgement and some of the results of these mis-judgements, could prove to be very unsettling to the markets! 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Old Codger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 547
Melbourne.
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #952 - Oct 8th, 2013 at 5:15am
 
I simply cannot imagine the US Congress allowing this situation to go all the way to a default.

It seems to me that the GOP is on a hiding to nothing in their negotiations,  and Obama has the whip hand.

There have been over 70 of these 'Debt Ceiling' things since WW2 and about 20 government shutdowns.  This time the repercussions of such a thing are too horrendous to contemplate, so my bet is that they will go to 5 minutes to midnight and agree.

JMO


OC
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #953 - Oct 8th, 2013 at 8:52pm
 
perceptions_now wrote on Oct 7th, 2013 at 10:53am:
perceptions_now wrote on Oct 6th, 2013 at 11:15am:
Swagman wrote on Oct 5th, 2013 at 3:37pm:
perceptions_now wrote on Oct 5th, 2013 at 3:22pm:
Swagman wrote on Oct 5th, 2013 at 2:52pm:
Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 5th, 2013 at 1:35pm:
Swagman wrote on Oct 5th, 2013 at 12:35pm:
The reason humans are not extinct is because they long ago found out the competitive advantage of exploiting the environment.



yes until there was nothing left to exploit Sad

Humans are the only living species capable of destroying the environment they live in Sad Actually humans are just vermin  !!


Speak for yourself... Grin

Life is about exploiting the environment.  The best exploiters survive and evolve.



I'm sure your children & grand children, will thank you - NOT!


You are exploiting the environment right now.  You are breathing in oxygen and breathing out CO2.  If you stop you will croak.  ALL LIFE exploits the environment.  ALL LIFE is an environmental parasite.




Not all life, BUT there are certainly some who fit that criteria, some because they think they are so smart & others simply because they are so dumb!

An example of those that don't have brains, are the Bacteria that Professor Bartlet talks about in the following video.


There are also plenty of examples in the human race, of people who THINK that we are smart enough to avoid the worst of some of the apparent environmental problems, although that thinking is not backed up by history!

Btw, if you take away the bacteria in the video & replace them with humans, then ARE WE CURRENTLY ONE MINUTE TO HIGH NOON!

In saying that, let me ask those who "know better", what is an acceptable level of growth, is it -
A) 10%
B) 7%   
C) 3.5%
D) 1.5%
E) 1.0% 
F) Break even
G) Something less than Break even



It seems that the likes of Swaggy, Longy & Maqqy don't think they know better?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #954 - Oct 9th, 2013 at 12:08am
 
Growth Rate            
1.00%
Whatever is being measured, Doubles every 70 years

1.50%
Whatever is being measured, Doubles @ 46 years & hits 300% after 75 years.

2.00%
Whatever is being measured, Doubles every 35 years.

3.5%
Whatever is being measured, Doubles every 20 years.

7.00%
Whatever is being measured, Doubles every 10 years.

And, if what is being measured is Global Population, then that would mean in 2083, only 70 years from now -
@ 1.00% - the Global Population would be 14 Billion
@ 1.50% - the Global Population would be closing in on 21 Billion
@ 2.00% - the Global Population would be 28 Billion
@ 3.50% - the Global Population would be closing in on 78 Billion
@ 7.00% - the Global Population would be closing in on 800 Billion


The standard Global Population Growth rate over the last 80 years or so, has been just over 1.50%.

Clearly, the planet will not support human Growth rates @ 7%, 3.5% or even 2%!

I would also suggest, it has very little chance even at 1.5% and it is even likely to struggle at 1%!

So, something/s must change and the starting points must be Politics & Economics!

And, if that start is not made soon, then we will consign our children, grandchildren & all future generations to an existence not currently conceived or no existence at all.

IT'S TIME!   


PS - We need to be very careful what we ask for, particularly if we don't fully comprehend what that means!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Old Codger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 547
Melbourne.
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #955 - Oct 9th, 2013 at 5:04am
 
pn,


I fully expect that 'Mother Nature' will solve the over population problem over the coming decades.

Have you ever seen or experienced a mouse plague?   The mouse population in an area explodes,  and they number in the millions if not billions,  and then all of a sudden they all die.  Not from lack of food or water either, just a mass die off.

I expect that something like a pandemic of Bird Flu or somesuch will be the way most of us go in that scenario.  The 747 will ensure it spreads around the world at 900 KMH.   The last pandemic cost an 'estimated' 55 million people,  and that was before the 747.

JMO


OC







Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #956 - Oct 10th, 2013 at 1:13pm
 
Forget The Debt Ceiling: Stock Prices Are Very Low


Thesis: Don't sell, but be prepared to buy aggressively if prices go any lower.

Q: Given the risk of a Treasury default, should the prudent investor sell now and repurchase when it's all over?

A: I say don't sell, but be ready to buy if there is a big sell-off.

The Dow is down 800 points since mid-September, and is now selling for the same price as in May. The forward earnings yield on the S&P 500 is 6.4% and the current dividend yield is 2.1%.

This compares with a Treasury yield curve of:

    1-year: 0.10%
    5-year: 1.4%
    10-year: 2.6%
    20-year: 3.4%
    30-year: 3.7%

Aswath Damodaran* at NYU estimates the Equity Risk Premium as of Oct. 1st at 5.73%, which is as high as it's been since the Carter years. However, if you look at his calculation of the ratio of the ERP to the risk-free rate, now ~3.2x, it is the highest it has ever been, and six times its historical average of 0.5x.

Clearly stocks are deep in value territory by these yardsticks. It is true that Treasury yields could rise, but it is almost certain that the earnings yield will rise by more, since corporate earnings continue to grow, and companies continue to reduce their float. We are looking today at an historic buying opportunity, similar to the inflationary period of 1977 to 1983, when the Dow was bouncing around 900.
If nothing else were to happen except that the ERP/risk-free rate were to normalize at .5x, the Dow today would be 10 times its current level.
That is the scale of today's opportunity, at least according to me.

Given that both sides on the Hill appear to be digging in, there is a chance that the risk of a Treasury default could produce a major sell-off, which would make equity valuation all the more compelling. Similarly, there is also the risk of a last-minute deal that could produce a rally. My thinking is that one should hold back just a little longer before taking a plunge, but not too long. I assign a very low probability to a default, so my inclination is to start bargain-hunting soon, before it's too late.

Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1734832-forget-the-debt-ceiling-stock-prices-are...
==========================================
Well, whatever, the supposed rational is behind the following statement -

"If nothing else were to happen except that the ERP/risk-free rate were to normalize at .5x, the Dow today would be 10 times its current level."


I would venture that it is full of -
C
redible
R
eliable
A
bundant
P
aradoxes

In My Opinion, the chances of a 50% Decline in Share Prices, is substantially greater, than a further 20% increase, bearing in mind that even with a recent 5% drop, the DOW has already at 220% of where it was in March 2009.

One should also bear in mind that one of the major reasons for the Share Price increase since March 2009, that being the Federal Reserve bailouts can not continue, without drastic effects becoming apparent, starting in the "value" of US$ exchange rates.

Finally, one should also bear in mind that the major Global Economic Drivers are now predominantly negative and will be for quite some time. Those Drivers being -
1) Demographics -With Global Populations now leveling off, prior to going into actual Decline, over the next 20-30 years.
2) Energy Supply - Global Energy Supply, particularly Fossil Fuels, is also now leveling off, prior to going into actual Decline, over the next 20-30 years. That will force very significant Price increases, which will further dampen Demand & therefore depress the Global Economy.
3) Climate Change - Whatever the cause, the Global Climate is now changing from the "Goldilocks" climate we have enjoyed over the last few hundred years. The result being, it will become much more difficult for both Food & Fresh Water Supply & that will add to our Demographic problems, thus putting further stress on Population levels.

Personally, given the Economic basics & the Political stupidity of the major Political Party's, I would suggest a 50%+ Decline in Share Prices is quite likely, over the short term period ahead
!
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 10th, 2013 at 1:21pm by perceptions_now »  
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #957 - Oct 10th, 2013 at 1:44pm
 
Old Codger wrote on Oct 9th, 2013 at 5:04am:
pn,


I
fully expect that 'Mother Nature' will solve the over population problem over the coming decades
.


Have you ever seen or experienced a mouse plague?   The mouse population in an area explodes,  and they number in the millions if not billions,  and then all of a sudden they all die.  Not from lack of food or water either, just a mass die off.

I expect that something like a pandemic of Bird Flu or somesuch will be the way most of us go in that scenario.  The 747 will ensure it spreads around the world at 900 KMH.   The last pandemic cost an 'estimated' 55 million people,  and that was before the 747.

JMO


OC



I would suggest a mixture of "Mother Nature" & Human stupidity!


Your comment raises an issue, which was one of 6 major events that I wrote about back in early 2006, which I thought would/could have major possible Future Impacts, those being -

FUTURE WINDOWS

Possible Major Influencing Events, include:

1)      
END OF CURRENT STANDARD BUSINESS CYCLE

Event Initiator
- Usual cycle transition

Event Start Date
- Late 2006 to end 2007

Event Outcome/s
- Normally, low, if well managed.

Event Duration
- 12 to 24 months

Event Probabilities
-      Within 18 months, 100 to 0.
-      Worst Case Scenario, 20-80.


2) 
TERROR

Event Initiator
- Biological, Nuclear attack on Major Financial/Population centre, particularly in USA or major attack on Saudi Oil reserves/refineries.

Event Start Date
- Now to 10 years time?

Event Outcome/s
-      Medium to Significant, depending on the nature of the event.
-      Significant to devastating, if major damage to Saudi oil reserves/refineries or closing down of the USA financial system for an extended period.
 
Event Duration
- 1 to 20 years, depending on the nature of the event.

Event Probabilities
-      Within next 5 years, 80-20.
-      Worse Case Scenario, 50-50. 


3) 
INTERNATIONAL PANDEMIC

Event Initiator
- Major outbreak of Bird flu variant, spread as normal flu, by air.

Event Start Date
No way of knowing, but Murphy’s law may well be a guide.

Event Outcome/s
- Borders close, international trade and Tourism cease, the results would include countless 
  millions dead and an economic depression.

Event Duration
- 20 to 30years.

Event Probabilities
-      Within next 20 years, 30-70.
-      If event happens, Worst Case Scenario, 60-40.


4)
PEAK OIL

Event Initiator
- First reports that production can not keep pace with consumption, due to insufficient reserves.

Event Start Date
- Within 5 years.

Event Outcome/s
- Significant, to rampant increase in Oil related product pricing.
- Significantly increase inflationary pressure.
- Significant problems, in replacing Oil base, in many product lines.
- Immediate, knee-jerk reaction to implement Nuclear power.
- Increased, subsequent push for Green alternatives.

Event Duration
- 20 to 30 years

Event Probabilities
- Within 5 years, 80 to 20.
- Worse Case Scenario, 60-40.


5) 
BABY BOOMER RETIREMENT

Event Initiator
- Commencement of post WW2 babies going into retirement.

Event Start Date
- Already commenced recently – 2005.

Event Outcome/s- Significant reduction in Workforce Participation is likely, notwithstanding government efforts to delay.
- Immigrant intake dilemma likely, some will want a greater intake, to offset bottlenecks in some workforce sectors, whilst others will seek lower intake, to offset rising unemployment.
- Significant cost factor increases will enter the economy, due to population aging and lower Participation Rate, causing inflationary & deflationary pressures to grow.
- Significant reduction in Property values is likely, as event shifts thru to retirement and to the death of Baby Boomer generation. The generation birth rates that followed the Boomers reduced to 60%, then 40% in more recent times. As the asset rich Baby Boomers die, those left will be less well off and there will be less of them – the laws of supply & demand will take over.
- Significant reduction in Share Market values is likely and an extended depression, commencing around 2010, give or take a couple of years.

Event Duration
- 20 to 30 years.

Event Probabilities
- Start 100% - Has been guaranteed for over fifty years.
-Worst case scenario, 60-40


6) 
CLIMATE CHANGE

Event Initiator- Most likely Carbon overload of atmosphere from vehicles, power plants and the like.

Event Start Date - Already started.

Event Outcome/s
- Increase in severe weather events, such as Hurricanes, Floods, Droughts.
- Increase in sea levels worldwide, causing mass evacuations of coastal populations and deaths.
- Shutdown of ocean currents circulation between polar caps and equator, due increase    
in fresh water, arising from melting of large sections of polar ice shelfs. Possible result is new
ice age.
- Unless action is Worldwide and immediate (which does not seem likely), then the most   
probable outcomes appear bleak.
- If concerted action not taken immediately, this could be an end game scenario, the results
could include a Billions plus dead, an economic depression, much worse than the Great Depression
and major wars.

Event Duration
- How long is a piece of string?

Event Probabilities
- Start 100%.
- Worse case scenario, 65-35.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 10th, 2013 at 1:53pm by perceptions_now »  
 
IP Logged
 
Old Codger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 547
Melbourne.
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #958 - Oct 10th, 2013 at 2:35pm
 
The only one on that list that i would subscribe to is Pandemic.

We will be VERY lucky to avoid it.  But I doubt it will last 10 or 20 years, the last one was from about 1919 to about 1922.

Even the great plagues did not last that long.

OC
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #959 - Oct 10th, 2013 at 6:01pm
 
Janet Yellen as the new US Fed chief not just good economic news


Even as the world’s most powerful economy is held to ransom by the incomprehensible bickering of puffed up, petty-minded congressional politicians, President Barack Obama is able to create a moment of light with the near universally acclaimed nomination of Janet Yellen as the next chairman of the US Federal Reserve.

Yellen is vice-chairman of the Federal Reserve and deputy to the current chairman Ben Bernanke, who was appointed in 2006.

So let there be no doubt that her appointment to succeed Bernanke is well founded. Credentials aside, the appointment – or nomination, until it is confirmed by the Senate – represents a welcome first: the first woman to serve as chairman of the Federal Reserve in its 100-year history.

Obama’s nomination of Janet Yellen has international consequences because she will become the world’s most powerful central banker, but it will hopefully resonate in Australia for different reasons.

Link -
http://www.brw.com.au/p/leadership/appointment_economic_janet_yellen_AabOx2F2QMM...
===========================================
On the strength of the Yellen nomination today, the US DOW Futures market is currently up 83.
http://www.investing.com/indices/us-30-futures-advanced-chart

Good luck Janet, your going to need all the luck this & a bit more!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 ... 117
Send Topic Print