Yadda wrote on May 3
rd, 2014 at 10:01pm:
I'm glad someone invented and decided to compile, a dictionary.
[...for all of these words i do not know]
Yadda - some words that you understand:
Quote:Genesis 2:7 (KJ21)
7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
Some "scientific" abiogenesis stuff:
Quote: Clay Could Have Encouraged First Cells to Form
Oct 24, 2003 |By Sarah Graham
COURTESY OF J.W. SZOSTAK
While many armchair philosophers are searching for the meaning of life, researchers are hard at work investigating the origins of life on Earth. New findings suggest that a lump of clay could have provided a platform for the formation of primordial cells.
Previous research indicated that chemicals found in so-called montmorillonite clay could catalyze reactions involved in constructing RNA from nucleotides....
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/clay-could-have-encourage/Both mention clay, but one text uses the words "could have".
Which do you think is probably the most accurate? The account of Genesis taken literally or not so literally, or on the other hand, the untested hypothesis?
Then according to greek mythology Prometheus created man from clay, while Athena breathed life into them.
.. and even the Koran:
Quote:023.012
YUSUFALI: Man We did create from a quintessence (of clay);
PICKTHAL: Verily We created man from a product of wet earth;
SHAKIR: And certainly We created man of an extract of clay,