mozzaok wrote on Aug 18
th, 2010 at 5:45pm:
You are welcome, and as I agreed that we would allow people a fair amount of latitude during the campaign, I have let most things go, but unadulterated trolling, without any real political relevance of worth is taking that freedom too far.
Thanks for understanding, and appreciate that it will be the same result whatever political affiliation the trollee has, so just let me know if you see any threads started that you consider blatant, and I will check them out.
Will do Moz, you can count on me to state the obvious and all things 'blatant' from here on.
Glad to be of assistance, and am pleased you removed what had clearly regressed to what appeared to be someone's perverted IM discussion.
It's ok to have a little relevant humour, though draw the line when people take the opportunity to try to sexually intimidate their challenger by means being gross.
I think this is why the individual posted what they did, for the shock-horror factor.
This and because they probably didn't like me stating the obvious, of which is Telehealth has the potential to be exploited, particularly if Gillard plans to source telehealth care providers off shore.
Then there's the security concerns too, ie, google health records being stored/tampered with online, very personal health related information being video-streamed to potentially all and sundry.....
I mean, if hackers managed to get into our governments database, this and the CRU (climate gate)...then can we be sure our very personal information is secure?
Ie, theft of medicare numbers, etc?
I urge you all to look into this proposed Obama-Gillard telehealth plan and give it a bit more thought.
Pity, we only have a few days though.
i