Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
Keynesianism (Read 15276 times)
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #60 - Sep 9th, 2010 at 11:00am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 9th, 2010 at 1:29am:
Quote:
That said, my comment was directed more to the major players such as the USA, Europe & China. The USA & Europe are already at all time interest rate lows & they are closing in quickly on all time Debt to GDP highs.



1) Does that mean the reserve bank leavers will stop working?
2) Countries have had negative interest rates before.
3) It is only a psychological barrier, nothing more
.



1) I asumme you mean levers and the answer is, No!
They won't STOP WORKING, but they will only work at the margins, they will not & can not stop the tide from going out on Demand and that is the issue, falling Demand!

Demand has already started to fall slightly, but as the Aging Boomer generation starts retiring enmass, Demand will decline further (as will productivity per capita), over the next 10-20 years, before the massive Boomer generation start to die enmass.

In concert with that, the Global Population Growth rate has already been slowing for over 40 years, it will continue to do so and within 20-30 years the falling Global Fertility rate will mix with the massive die-off of the Boomer generation, to produce an actual decline in the Global total Population, which will continue perhaps until the end of this century.
The combined effect of these two Population issues, will result in a massive decline in Demand for everything!

2) Which major Economies & When?
3) I disagree, the barriers involved here are real, very real and they will not be moved by Central Banks or governments!

Both Governments and Central Banks have had their opportunities & they blew it!

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49407
At my desk.
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #61 - Sep 17th, 2010 at 8:41pm
 
Quote:
They won't STOP WORKING, but they will only work at the margins


They have only ever worked at the margins. The actions of the reserve bank are only intended to restrict 'short term' fluctations and were never intended to drive long term growth.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #62 - Sep 17th, 2010 at 11:35pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 17th, 2010 at 8:41pm:
Quote:
They won't STOP WORKING, but they will only work at the margins


They have only ever worked at the margins. The actions of the reserve bank are only intended to restrict 'short term' fluctations and were never intended to drive long term growth.


That's a reasonable statement!

However, I doubt that Keynes or anyone else ever thought there would be a situation, such as this, where the Central Banks levers would not be able to correct an Economic downturn, within a fairly quick period of time.

They were wrong!  
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49407
At my desk.
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #63 - Sep 18th, 2010 at 10:36am
 
Sounds like a strawman argument to me.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #64 - Sep 18th, 2010 at 11:22am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 18th, 2010 at 10:36am:
Sounds like a strawman argument to me.


Is that the one, about "the straw/man that broke the camels (Golbal Economy) back"?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49407
At my desk.
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #65 - Sep 18th, 2010 at 1:14pm
 
No. It's where you put words into these people's mouths, then claim they were wrong because the arguments you made up on their behalf are wrong.

Keynes et all were well aware of the potential situations that could arise and there is absolutely nothing unique about our current situation. It is still looking like a rapid recovery compared to the depressions that occurred prior to Keynesian style intervention. Central banks have never been able to completely eliminate macroeconomic ups and downs and you are shifting the goal posts to suggest that they should.

The fact is, we are far better off now that we would have been without the actions of central banks. Prior to the downturn, interest rates were artificially high due to the central banks for many years. The debt bubble and it's collapse would have been far bigger without the central banks.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #66 - Sep 18th, 2010 at 3:56pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 18th, 2010 at 1:14pm:
No. It's where you put words into these people's mouths, then claim they were wrong because the arguments you made up on their behalf are wrong.


1) Keynes et all were well aware of the potential situations that could arise
2) and there is absolutely nothing unique about our current situation.
3) It is still looking like a rapid recovery compared to the depressions that occurred prior to Keynesian style intervention.
4) Central banks have never been able to completely eliminate macroeconomic ups and downs and you are shifting the goal posts to suggest that they should.

5) The fact is, we are far better off now that we would have been without the actions of central banks.

6) Prior to the downturn, interest rates were artificially high due to the central banks for many years.

7) The debt bubble and it's collapse would have been far bigger without the central banks.


1 & 2) Are you seriously suggesting that in the 1930's Keynes was aware  that the Great Depression he was then fighting,( which would finally be resolved only by a World War), would spawn the greatest Baby Boom in human history?

That he also knew that Baby Boom would repeat on humanity, some 60 years later, in the form of the Great Baby Boomer Bust?

Did Keynes also know that in the early part of this century the Global Energy Sources, which were then only just coming in, that those Energy sources would start to Decline, thus exposing the Global Economy to massive costs & productivity shortfalls?

And, did Keynes also know that following the Economic Bust of a generation that had not even started to be born, when Keynes was fighting the Great Depression, that an even great Economic conundrum was waiting, as the Global Population would decline back from around 8 Billion (4 times 1930), to around 2-3 Billion?

If you are suggesting that, then Keynes must indeed have been a unique person!

3) Ihope you are correct, but logic tells me it just isn't going to happen that way. It is likely be long, protracted & not all that pretty!

4) In fact, I have not been saying that Central Banks can completely eliminate macroeconomic ups and downs. I have been saying that CB's can make a difference at the margins, but they can not swim against the Global Macro Economic forces, particularly those now arrayed against them.

5) Yes, but that effect is only temporary and because of the Debts incurred, particularly in the USA & Europe, it may make matters worse.

6) In fact, in the USA, where it counts, I can not agree thay rates were articifially high prior to the the downturn (2007).
...

...

If anything, the US Fed held rates far to low, for far too long, after 9/11.

7) In fact, the CB's & various national governments (Pollies) were actually largely responsible these Debt bubbles, in the first place.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49407
At my desk.
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #67 - Sep 18th, 2010 at 7:25pm
 
He didn't have a crystal ball, but that is not the same as being aware of the potential situations. The whole point of a functioning economy is that it can handle whatever level of resource availability becomes the reaslity.

Quote:
Ihope you are correct, but logic tells me it just isn't going to happen that way. It is likely be long, protracted & not all that pretty!


These are all relative terms that are meaningless in judging the effectiveness of the reserve bank. The rational way to judge the reserve bank is whether they made the situation better or worse. It would be extremely difficult to argue that they made it worse.

Quote:
I have been saying that CB's can make a difference at the margins, but they can not swim against the Global Macro Economic forces, particularly those now arrayed against them.


Right. And this is all about figuring out what you actually mean by 'at the margins'. It could mean everything from making only a negligible difference to functioning exactly as they are intended to.

Quote:
In fact, in the USA, where it counts, I can not agree thay rates were articifially high prior to the the downturn (2007).


So you think they would have been higher without the US federal reserve? Please explain? Again, you present evidence, but fail to interpret it correctly. Artifically high does not mean a specific number, but only means higher than they would have been if left to market forces alone.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #68 - Sep 19th, 2010 at 9:05am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 18th, 2010 at 7:25pm:
He didn't have a crystal ball, but that is not the same as being aware of the potential situations. The whole point of a functioning economy is that it can handle whatever level of resource availability becomes the reaslity.


The whole point is -
That the Global Economy is running down, for reasons I have frequently stated and it will shortly cease to be the relatively smooth functioning Economy, that we have known for the last 60 years or so!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49407
At my desk.
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #69 - Sep 19th, 2010 at 9:54am
 
So your point has nothing to do with keynesianism? I thought you were keen to get back to the topic?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #70 - Sep 19th, 2010 at 11:34am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 19th, 2010 at 9:54am:
perceptions_now wrote on Sep 19th, 2010 at 9:05am:
freediver wrote on Sep 18th, 2010 at 7:25pm:
He didn't have a crystal ball, but that is not the same as being aware of the potential situations. The whole point of a functioning economy is that it can handle whatever level of resource availability becomes the reaslity.


The whole point is -
That the Global Economy is running down, for reasons I have frequently stated and it will shortly cease to be the relatively smooth functioning Economy, that we have known for the last 60 years or so!


So your point has nothing to do with keynesianism? I thought you were keen to get back to the topic?


Ok, how is this, for on topic.

You have said that, the Keynesian approach is short term, not long term and that the whole point of a functioning economy is that it can handle whatever level of resource availability becomes the reality.

Well, the reality is that the set of Global Macro Factors we are now facing, means there must be a long term delevraging of the Global Economy, as Demand WILL DECLINE, slightly at first, then building to massive levels, as this century continues.

Keynesian approaches may still be usefull, but this time to smooth the lumps on the Economic down trend, instead of the up-trend we have experienced for the last 60 or so years!

But, the Austrian approach will also have its moments! It's a little like Food, a little of this & a little of that, but everything in moderation, which is what should have happened with Global Debt!

Btw, in case you haven't noticed, it's not all about Keynes, nor you, nor me, all of these things are interlocked.

In other words, the butterfly effect is very real and it is the whole view that matters!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49407
At my desk.
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #71 - Sep 19th, 2010 at 1:11pm
 
What do you mean by delevraging?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
HigherBeam
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #72 - Sep 19th, 2010 at 2:53pm
 
What Does Deleverage Mean?
A company's attempt to decrease its financial leverage. The best way for a company to delever is to immediately pay off any existing debt on its balance sheet. If it is unable to do this, the company will be in significant risk of defaulting.
Back to top
 

The truth will become known eventually and where trolling is a art form.&& && &&
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #73 - Sep 20th, 2010 at 5:09pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 19th, 2010 at 1:11pm:
What do you mean by delevraging?


Have a look thru Chris Martensons Crash Course, for which I have now posted all sections on the following thread.

As suggested, I think it is worth having a look at Chapter 19 first, for an overview, then go back to Chapter’s 1 thru 18, to get a full perspective and finally, look at Chapter 20.

Then come back & see if you want to ask the same question or if you have something different in mind?

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1277536490/all
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49407
At my desk.
Re: Keynesianism
Reply #74 - Sep 20th, 2010 at 9:14pm
 
So if I read this entire book I will find an answer to my simple question?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print