freediver wrote on Sep 18
th, 2010 at 1:14pm:
No. It's where you put words into these people's mouths, then claim they were wrong because the arguments you made up on their behalf are wrong.
1) Keynes et all were well aware of the potential situations that could arise
2) and there is absolutely nothing unique about our current situation.
3) It is still looking like a rapid recovery compared to the depressions that occurred prior to Keynesian style intervention.
4) Central banks have never been able to completely eliminate macroeconomic ups and downs and you are shifting the goal posts to suggest that they should.
5) The fact is, we are far better off now that we would have been without the actions of central banks.
6) Prior to the downturn, interest rates were artificially high due to the central banks for many years.
7) The debt bubble and it's collapse would have been far bigger without the central banks.
1 & 2) Are you seriously suggesting that in the 1930's Keynes was aware that the Great Depression he was then fighting,( which would finally be resolved only by a World War), would spawn the greatest Baby Boom in human history?
That he also knew that Baby Boom would repeat on humanity, some 60 years later, in the form of the Great Baby Boomer Bust?
Did Keynes also know that in the early part of this century the Global Energy Sources, which were then only just coming in, that those Energy sources would start to Decline, thus exposing the Global Economy to massive costs & productivity shortfalls?
And, did Keynes also know that following the Economic Bust of a generation that had not even started to be born, when Keynes was fighting the Great Depression, that an even great Economic conundrum was waiting, as the Global Population would decline back from around 8 Billion (4 times 1930), to around 2-3 Billion?
If you are suggesting that, then Keynes must indeed have been a unique person!
3) Ihope you are correct, but logic tells me it just isn't going to happen that way. It is likely be long, protracted & not all that pretty!
4) In fact, I have not been saying that Central Banks can completely eliminate macroeconomic ups and downs. I have been saying that CB's can make a difference at the margins, but they can not swim against the Global Macro Economic forces, particularly those now arrayed against them.
5) Yes, but that effect is only temporary and because of the Debts incurred, particularly in the USA & Europe, it may make matters worse.
6) In fact, in the USA, where it counts, I can not agree thay rates were articifially high prior to the the downturn (2007).
![... ...](http://www.moneycafe.com/library/ratecharts/ratecharts17.gif)
![... ...](http://www.abilityfinance.com.au/sites/default/files/img_thumbnails/24_28.jpeg)
If anything, the US Fed held rates far to low, for far too long, after 9/11.
7) In fact, the CB's & various national governments (Pollies) were actually largely responsible these Debt bubbles, in the first place.