Amadd wrote on Sep 11
th, 2010 at 3:35am:
I like really fast broadband, but what does it mean?
Streaming HD movies? That's not really important is it?
The belief that the capacity to work faster will allow us only to do faster what we did before is a mark of a mediocre mind.
Quote:How will it impact upon us compared to what other technologies may be able to provide?
There are always alternatives. Failure to choose one is paralysis. This has been chosen.
Quote:The price is upwards of $2000 per person. That's pretty huge.
$2,000 over 8 years = $250 per year = less than $5 per week. Huge?
Quote:We are also going increasingly mobile. For the most part, we don't even need that sort of capacity.
Non sequitur. The fact that the significance of mobile is increasing does not render fixed lines unnecessary. The technologies are complementary.
Assuming that we don't currently need that sort of capacity (which is questionable), can you guarantee that we never will? Competitor nations are upgrading their infrastructure. To quote from
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/pipermail/link/2010-August/089266.html:
Quote:... with our trading partners moving to fibre, applications that consume higher bandwidth *will* emerge and we will be caught short as a nation if in the long term we don't have the infrastructure to compete.
Quote:I really wonder why this has been made out to be a priority when it clearly isn't.
Clearly, those who are qualified to know, know better.