Equitist wrote on Sep 12
th, 2010 at 11:32pm:
Surely, folks, the primary role of governments in education, ought to be to: overcome the relative socio-economic advantages and disadvantages experienced by children by accident of birth - rather than to reinforce or exacerbate the polarisation!?
Governments do not, nor should not engage in social engineering, at least not in a democratic country like our own.
The primary role of government in education is to ensure every child has access to one.
And the current model does exactly that.
The only correct and proper argument regarding the education of Australia's children is outcomes.
On average, throughout the country, private schools have a better academic record.
On average throughout the country, private school students cost taxpayers about half what a state school student costs.
That private schools offer different facilities, or different length swimming pools is irrelevant as far as your argument about education is concerned.
What is best for a child should be a decision for a parent to make. Not a decision that should be made by the bitter and envious peering over the school fence shouting 'obscene' while attempting to drag everyone down to their level.