longweekend58 wrote on Oct 6
th, 2010 at 7:19pm:
# wrote on Oct 6
th, 2010 at 9:00am:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2
nd, 2010 at 5:31pm:
...
you seem to think fibre is the ULTIMATE technology. have you heard nothing of information packets carried by sub-atomic particles/waves or quantum behaviour that might even lead to literally instantaneous data transfer? you might even wonder about transmission FASTER than light but you wil lprobably not be able to google much on it and understand even less.
Presumably you're referring to quantum entanglement? Very theoretical and unlikely to see practical application within the lifetime of anyone in this forum. Fibre is here, now, and the best available.
just like quantum computers, i dont expect qantum entanglement-based technology any time soon. the point is that people who think fibre is the ultimate never-to-be-improved technology are naive.
LMAO, that is one of the silliest points I have ever heard on this whole broadband issue, and there have been some amazingly ridiculous claims made.
Your theorising over faster than light technology as a possible negative argument to be held against fibre, would be akin to a man in the 1950's deciding never to use a car, because he just knows that sooner or later we will all have individual rocket packs to get us around, as many folk in the 1950's expected we would have had, before the turn of the century.
I suppose we can add this to the arguments that seek to provide an option apart from the bleeding obvious, which is to use the current best technology, that provides immediate benefit, and long term up-scalability potential, which is what Labor are doing with the NBN.
Thank goodness Abbott the negative man, the promiser of destruction, was too short sighted, and too ignorant, to educate himself about what the NBN actually was, before the election, because if he had supported the NBN, he would be PM now.