Postmodern Trendoid III
|
Schopenhauer's belief of the beautiful, not 'sense', as that insinuates the use of the senses, hence phenomenal interaction, is when when we enter pure contemplation devoid of all willing; it is to become a timeless, will-less subject that mirrors the Platonic object/Ideas. Hence, the subject becomes the object; it sees things as they are in-themselves.
This sounds nice, but it makes the logical fallacy that you can rip yourself outside of time, space, and causality, that is, to severe the chain of cause and effect. It is also predicated on the belief that Platonic Ideas do actually exist. Schopenhauer, like all mystics in this domain, come to their conclusions through experience, not intuition. That is, he had to read about it and then experience it. The intuition part is only added after the methodology runs its course. It also presumes that this mindset (timeless, will-less subject) is actually seeing things as they are in-themselves. How does he know this? Because Plato and Kant told him so? Could he not be experiencing something else? Another blow for the fans of the mind/body split. What's so good about wanting to depart from the chain of cause and effect anyway? Does life suck so much that you want to escape it? Could this Buddhist style meditation really just be for the weary, those who dislike the world?
Could not the world with all its anger, frustration, alienation, along with love and compassion be beautiful? Can you affirm the eternal recurrence of all things?
|