adelcrow wrote on Dec 17
th, 2010 at 8:09am:
Its quite simple.
A fast and efficient system of processing by Australian officials in Indonesia and Malaysia would solve the problem of the few desperate people taking desperate measures seeking asylum in Australia.
We have a very small issue with asylum seekers compared to the rest of the world and even when compared to poorer countries in our own region we certainly do not shoulder enough of the refugee burden.
No matter how many boats are arriving in Australian waters at the moment..its still a tiny minority of the worlds Asylum seeker problem and as we all know the vast majority of these people comes from war torn countries where we hold some responsibility.
Howards solution was to bomb Afghanistan and Iraq and then when the refugees poured out of those countries he decided to take political mileage and tell Indonesia that this product of our invasion was their problem and not ours.
The people who declare the Asylum seeker problem can be solved simply by making life so hard if they try and seek refuge here ignore the facts that we have an international obligation to help but we also have a regional obligation to shoulder a fair share along with our already over burdened nieghbours who, unlike us, did not cause this refugee problem in the first place.
13,000.
That's the number of asylum seekers Howard took in at the time the people smugglers were put out of business.
1 boat in 2 years, 5 detainees on Nauru, closed down mainland detention centres all in the great year Howard took 13,000 refugees.
This isn't about 'fair share'.
This is purely about our government not sponsoring foreign criminal people smuggling gangs.
Our government is not in the business of supporting foreign or domestic criminals, so why start now.
And why shouldn't they make it hard for criminals to earn their filthy lucre preying on peoples misery for mere profit.
If the boats were stopped tomorrow, Australia would still accept 13,000 refugees and meet our international obligations.