Life.
Quote:My humble apologies, you're correct, although Rolex ceased production of the one in the OP in 2001.
It's probably a good idea for both Rolex and Omega to offer budget (quartz) movements as an alternative to their pricier mechanical automatic movements. Especially for those who are purely making a purchase based upon the brand name.
No worries.
The Omega Seamaster 300 metre watch (above) costs around $5,000.
It's hardly for those on a budget.
I know that I would prefer the quartz version they make because it's more accurate.
This thread is placed in the - "
Technically speaking" section for a reason.
It's to technically evaluate the best watches.
I hope you have read the article at this address:?
http://forums.watchuseek.com/showthread.php?t=2087It gives a wonderful insight into the technical advances made with quartz.
In fact the quartz crystal oscillates in a mechanical way.
It actually moves back & forth at high frequency so it is in some ways
still a mechanical watch.
The battery is only used to excite the quartz to move.
Some watches have 2 crystals & temperature compensation as well.
To me the watches shown are so advanced that pure mechanical watches
are more a curiosity than a preferred method of time keeping.