Q. Were you approached by Sir Ken Jones or any his supporters to meet with him?Many people within Government have many discussions with individuals related to their portfolios and I don't intend to go into the details of any discussions I may or may not have had.
Q. Have you met with Sir Ken Jones?As I said, many people within Government are approached by a range of people in relation to their portfolio responsibilities and I don't intend to respond to any questions about private discussions I may or may not have had.
Q. Mr Baillieu said it was appropriate that Mr Kapel met with Sir Ken, Peter Ryan said he wouldn't have preferred that meeting went ahead. How come you are reluctant to say whether you met him or not, they seem happy to talk about it?As I say, the Deputy Premier and Premier have responded to the matters that you refer to and I don't intend to comment on discussions I may or may not have had with individuals that may be relevant with my portfolio.
Q. You have said in Parliament that you haven't met with Jeremy Rapke, and you said in Parliament the number of occasions you have met with Gavin Silbert. Why won't you say whether you met with Sir Ken Jones or not?As I said, ministers have discussions with a number of people on a private basis in relation to their portfolio responsibilities and I'm not prepared to comment on whether I have or have not had discussions with any individual under those circumstances.
Q. Why not? You are willing to say in Parliament on the public record whether you have met with some senior legal figures, why won't you say, in the interests of openness and transparency as your government believes in, whether you have met with Sir Ken Jones or not?The comments that I've made in Parliament have related to questions as to meetings that I've had in a formal or official capacity and I've responded in relation to all meetings that I've had given that context. But as I've said, ministers meet with many different individuals in relation to their portfolio responsibilities and when those meetings take place on a private basis I'm not prepared to make any comment on whether they may or may not have taken place.
Q. Why is that inappropriate in a democracy, if the ministers of the crown are meeting with senior members of police, why wouldn't you just say yes or no?Well, as I say, ministers across their portfolio responsibilities have a range of meetings on a one-on-one basis and it's not necessarily appropriate to go into the details of those meetings.
Q. What's the difference between an official and unofficial meeting?Ministers meet with a number of individuals on a private basis and if those meetings are held on a private basis it is not necessarily appropriate to comment on the discussion that may or may not have occurred.
Q. So if you met him on a public basis you would say whether you met with him?Clearly if I'd met with Sir Ken in an official capacity I would be happy to respond in relation to that.
Q. So you met with him on an unofficial capacity then?Ministers have a number of meetings in a private capacity and it's not necessarily appropriate for them to comment the meetings they may or may not have had.
Q. Wasn't the Baillieu Government going to be more transparent than its predecessor about these very types of things?
I've simply responded to a question to say that ministers in their portfolio responsibilities from time to time have discussions on a private basis and it's not necessarily appropriate for them to comment as to whether or not these meetings have taken place