buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 11
th, 2011 at 8:51am:
whatsforme wrote on Jan 11
th, 2011 at 8:05am:
I am sure most of the old yahoo people here will remember the rant from buzz re school computers when some posters said Dudd 'promised' a laptop for every student. Buzz went right off saying 'show me where he promised a laptop for every student.
And he never DID
The "laptop" example was referencing a separate policy from the computers in schools program
At a press conference Rudd was holding a laptop up as an example of a range of products parents would be able to claim rebates on as part of their children's education
It was, also, left to the schools and STATE education departments as to the modeling of the 'computers for schools' set-up - though federally funded
But thats
Premier John Brumby this week said, "What occurred in the prison was obviously unacceptable, but the person concerned was a serial killer; I think it would be quite unnecessary and an inappropriate use of taxpayers' money to have a royal commission." Royal commissions should be reserved for "the most extraordinary circumstances", he added
But others have said that if Williams's death was not a simple jailhouse spat but rather a more sinister attack on the criminal justice system, then the very fact that it was perpetrated from within the prison system marks this crime as extraordinary.
State Opposition Leader Ted Baillieu has backed Stary's calls for an independent investigation into the drug baron's murder: "It's one thing to not care about Carl Williams, but it's another thing entirely to not care about the integrity of the justice system." Baillieu says. "This is a matter about the integrity of the justice system in this state, and that should be pre-eminent."
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/motive-uncertain-in-prison-murder/...Bailleu backs down on Williams inquest
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Victorian Premier Ted Baillieu is re-considering a an election promise to set up an investigation into the death of crime boss Carl Williams.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/2010/12/09/3089604.htm HIS WORD WERE
‘‘So I think Victorians are entitled to be concerned and confused about what’s gone on here and if it proves necessary then at least a judicial inquiry will be required,’’ he said today.
There was no promise and you know it, you just cant accept. There has yet to be anything that suggests it is necessary. If you can provide proof that is necessary, then be my guest.
You let Rudd off the hook because he says a computer for every student and holds up a laptop, but you think Ted promised an inquest when his words do not suggest that.
You are fast becoming the king of spin and deception by ommission Buzz.
Where is your proof it was promised.
And you link says nothing, he was non committed to anything. His words were something like Im not going to give a running commentary.
Must suck you cant get this right Buzz.