Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 15
Send Topic Print
The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC (Read 14699 times)
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #90 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:22pm
 
Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:16pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:13pm:
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 11:59am:
____ wrote on Dec 8th, 2010 at 5:56pm:
Is the climate the same as 4.6 billion years ago

No


Climate Change Proven




Outstanding, so we have survived through 4.6 million years of climate change.



Yep - did you know Mars' temperature has continued to climb over the last 40 years by the same relative temperature as Earth?

Now could it be the sun that both planets orbit?

Or has human factory emissions on Earth changed Mars' temperature too.

If so, we've managed some feat.





That maybe man-made climate change then, or perhaps a greens supporter can help clarify this.

I guess it could be natural climate change.
So again we must implement policies to counter natural climate change - to save Mars, and the Martians.


Wouldn't Mars be suffering from Martian-made climate change then???
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Miss Anne Dryst
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2296
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #91 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:24pm
 
____ wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:18pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:13pm:
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 11:59am:
____ wrote on Dec 8th, 2010 at 5:56pm:
Is the climate the same as 4.6 billion years ago

No


Climate Change Proven




Outstanding, so we have survived through 4.6 million years of climate change.



Yep - did you know Mars' temperature has continued to climb over the last 40 years by the same relative temperature as Earth?

Now could it be the sun that both planets orbit?

Or has human factory emissions on Earth changed Mars' temperature too.

If so, we've managed some feat.





A. Have humans been around for 4.6 Billion Years?

B. Got any data about Mar's temps Andrei. I reckon you are pulling everyone's leg with that comment.

C. And if Mar's temp has climbed like earths ... this disproves all the bull the denialists have said about the planet cooling in the last few years.





____ wrote on Dec 8th, 2010 at 5:56pm:
Is the climate the same as 4.6 billion years ago

No


Climate Change Proven





Wonder if the environmentalists can support the comment that the climate wasn't the same as 4.6 billion years ago.
Do you think that the scientific records may have been archived?
Back to top
 

It's hard to soar like an eagle when conversing with turkeys
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #92 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:25pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:22pm:
CLIMATE change sceptics have seized on news that Mars is heating up to back their claim that humans are not causing Earthly global warming.

The research comes from US planetary scientists, who suggest the Red Planet warmed by about 0.65C from the 1970s to the 1990s, similar to Earth's 0.6C average temperature rise during the 20th Century.

"It could be coincidental or it might be the needle in the haystack," said climatologist William Kininmonth, former head of the National Climate Centre in Melbourne.

"It's an interesting observation, as it's the same time period as Earth's temperature has been warming."

Mr Kininmonth said the research, published in the journal Nature, showed there was enough natural climate variability to account for global warming on Earth.

Not so, claimed Neville Nicholls, a climate scientist at Monash University in Melbourne.


Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.

"The paper is interesting but it hasn't got anything to do with the question of human impact on global warming on Earth," Dr Nicholls said.

"It's not an excuse to argue that humans are not causing global warming on Earth."

The research was done by a team led by Lori Fenton of the NASA Ames Research Centre at Moffett Field, California.

They used a computer model based on those devised to study global warming on Earth, adding Martian features such as a cold, airless surface and a shifting south polar ice cap while subtracting Earth's oceans and atmosphere.

Dr Fenton's group found that annual variation in the solar radiation reflected from the surface of Mars - its "albedo" - contributed to the warming by causing more blowing dust.

Over the past 30 years the dust swept clean large swaths of the planet's surface, reducing reflected radiation.

The result was a "positive feedback loop" between dust, wind, albedo and temperature.

"It's a nice piece of work," said UNSW climate scientist Andy Pitman.

"But there are no implications for Earth."

Professor Pitman was lead author of the climate modelling section of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report released in February.

Professor Pitman disputed Associate Professor Franks' claim that changes in Earth's albedo had a bigger influence on climate than greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

"Albedo is included in climate models," Professor Pitman said.

"It can have a local effect but cannot explain the observed warming record."

The Australian


http://www.perthnow.com.au/mars-warming-like-earth/story-e6frg4nl-1111113290972




Yes and in the last 3 years ?


There is a reason why the denialist dumped this line a couple of years ago ... keep on digging
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Miss Anne Dryst
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2296
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #93 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:26pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:22pm:
Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:16pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:13pm:
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 11:59am:
____ wrote on Dec 8th, 2010 at 5:56pm:
Is the climate the same as 4.6 billion years ago

No


Climate Change Proven




Outstanding, so we have survived through 4.6 million years of climate change.



Yep - did you know Mars' temperature has continued to climb over the last 40 years by the same relative temperature as Earth?

Now could it be the sun that both planets orbit?

Or has human factory emissions on Earth changed Mars' temperature too.

If so, we've managed some feat.





That maybe man-made climate change then, or perhaps a greens supporter can help clarify this.

I guess it could be natural climate change.
So again we must implement policies to counter natural climate change - to save Mars, and the Martians.


Wouldn't Mars be suffering from Martian-made climate change then???




Yes I guess they would be.
Those little green men (and women) suffering from green climate change.


Hey maybe Earth is also suffering from the greens as well.
Back to top
 

It's hard to soar like an eagle when conversing with turkeys
 
IP Logged
 
Miss Anne Dryst
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2296
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #94 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:28pm
 
Do the Green supporters or even environmentalists really know what the issue is?
Back to top
 

It's hard to soar like an eagle when conversing with turkeys
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #95 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:29pm
 
____ wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:25pm:
Yes and in the last 3 years ?


There is a reason why the denialist dumped this line a couple of years ago ... keep on digging


Ohhh, ok.

So now we're looking at 3 year periods of temperature change are we?

On planets billions of years old, we are starting to look at 3 year graphs.

What about by month?

Or shall we start to measure over weekends too?

Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #96 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:33pm
 
____ wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:25pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:22pm:
CLIMATE change sceptics have seized on news that Mars is heating up to back their claim that humans are not causing Earthly global warming.

The research comes from US planetary scientists, who suggest the Red Planet warmed by about 0.65C from the 1970s to the 1990s, similar to Earth's 0.6C average temperature rise during the 20th Century.

"It could be coincidental or it might be the needle in the haystack," said climatologist William Kininmonth, former head of the National Climate Centre in Melbourne.

"It's an interesting observation, as it's the same time period as Earth's temperature has been warming."

Mr Kininmonth said the research, published in the journal Nature, showed there was enough natural climate variability to account for global warming on Earth.

Not so, claimed Neville Nicholls, a climate scientist at Monash University in Melbourne.


Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.

"The paper is interesting but it hasn't got anything to do with the question of human impact on global warming on Earth," Dr Nicholls said.

"It's not an excuse to argue that humans are not causing global warming on Earth."

The research was done by a team led by Lori Fenton of the NASA Ames Research Centre at Moffett Field, California.

They used a computer model based on those devised to study global warming on Earth, adding Martian features such as a cold, airless surface and a shifting south polar ice cap while subtracting Earth's oceans and atmosphere.

Dr Fenton's group found that annual variation in the solar radiation reflected from the surface of Mars - its "albedo" - contributed to the warming by causing more blowing dust.

Over the past 30 years the dust swept clean large swaths of the planet's surface, reducing reflected radiation.

The result was a "positive feedback loop" between dust, wind, albedo and temperature.

"It's a nice piece of work," said UNSW climate scientist Andy Pitman.

"But there are no implications for Earth."

Professor Pitman was lead author of the climate modelling section of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report released in February.

Professor Pitman disputed Associate Professor Franks' claim that changes in Earth's albedo had a bigger influence on climate than greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

"Albedo is included in climate models," Professor Pitman said.

"It can have a local effect but cannot explain the observed warming record."

The Australian


http://www.perthnow.com.au/mars-warming-like-earth/story-e6frg4nl-1111113290972




Yes and in the last 3 years ?


There is a reason why the denialist dumped this line a couple of years ago ... keep on digging


You can keep struggling with this line of argument greens, but it's not going to work....

Earth's temp increased (in a century) by a little less than Mars' temp increased in 20 years.....There are NO known industries on Mars, so action other than 'natural' cannot be the cause of the Mars increase.

And since the Earth has warmed slower than Mars then human action cannot be blamed for the temperature increases on Earth....

Climate Change/Global Warming is a perfectly natural phenomenon and nothing we do can accelerate it or deccelerate it....
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Miss Anne Dryst
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2296
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #97 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:34pm
 
And not referring to Copenhagen when the Climategate was highlighted exposingthe scam from the scientists that the greens rely heavily upon.
No, not referring to that at all.
Rather the Cancun Convention highlights just how (un) intelligent the environmentalists are and how they are so willing to protest without giving a second thought to what the issue is actually about.


This is funny


As is
Back to top
 

It's hard to soar like an eagle when conversing with turkeys
 
IP Logged
 
Miss Anne Dryst
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2296
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #98 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:35pm
 
Cancun COP16 attendees fall for the old “dihydrogen monoxide” petition as well as signing up to cripple the U.S. Economy


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/12/08/cop16-attendees-fall-for-the-old-dihydrogen-monoxide-petition-as-well-as-signing-up-to-cripple-the-u-s-economy/#more-29077



If only the environmentalists had a thought process beforehand.
Would that be asking too much?
Back to top
 

It's hard to soar like an eagle when conversing with turkeys
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #99 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:38pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:29pm:
____ wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:25pm:
Yes and in the last 3 years ?


There is a reason why the denialist dumped this line a couple of years ago ... keep on digging


Ohhh, ok.

So now we're looking at 3 year periods of temperature change are we?

On planets billions of years old, we are starting to look at 3 year graphs.

What about by month?

Or shall we start to measure over weekends too?





Keep on digging since some planets have not followed earth's warming trend ... especially in the last three years.

Don't tell me you didn't know this since denials dumped the solar angle like hotcakes a couple of years ago.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #100 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:41pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:33pm:
____ wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:25pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:22pm:
CLIMATE change sceptics have seized on news that Mars is heating up to back their claim that humans are not causing Earthly global warming.

The research comes from US planetary scientists, who suggest the Red Planet warmed by about 0.65C from the 1970s to the 1990s, similar to Earth's 0.6C average temperature rise during the 20th Century.

"It could be coincidental or it might be the needle in the haystack," said climatologist William Kininmonth, former head of the National Climate Centre in Melbourne.

"It's an interesting observation, as it's the same time period as Earth's temperature has been warming."

Mr Kininmonth said the research, published in the journal Nature, showed there was enough natural climate variability to account for global warming on Earth.

Not so, claimed Neville Nicholls, a climate scientist at Monash University in Melbourne.


Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.

"The paper is interesting but it hasn't got anything to do with the question of human impact on global warming on Earth," Dr Nicholls said.

"It's not an excuse to argue that humans are not causing global warming on Earth."

The research was done by a team led by Lori Fenton of the NASA Ames Research Centre at Moffett Field, California.

They used a computer model based on those devised to study global warming on Earth, adding Martian features such as a cold, airless surface and a shifting south polar ice cap while subtracting Earth's oceans and atmosphere.

Dr Fenton's group found that annual variation in the solar radiation reflected from the surface of Mars - its "albedo" - contributed to the warming by causing more blowing dust.

Over the past 30 years the dust swept clean large swaths of the planet's surface, reducing reflected radiation.

The result was a "positive feedback loop" between dust, wind, albedo and temperature.

"It's a nice piece of work," said UNSW climate scientist Andy Pitman.

"But there are no implications for Earth."

Professor Pitman was lead author of the climate modelling section of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report released in February.

Professor Pitman disputed Associate Professor Franks' claim that changes in Earth's albedo had a bigger influence on climate than greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

"Albedo is included in climate models," Professor Pitman said.

"It can have a local effect but cannot explain the observed warming record."

The Australian


http://www.perthnow.com.au/mars-warming-like-earth/story-e6frg4nl-1111113290972




Yes and in the last 3 years ?


There is a reason why the denialist dumped this line a couple of years ago ... keep on digging


You can keep struggling with this line of argument greens, but it's not going to work....

Earth's temp increased (in a century) by a little less than Mars' temp increased in 20 years.....There are NO known industries on Mars, so action other than 'natural' cannot be the cause of the Mars increase.

And since the Earth has warmed slower than Mars then human action cannot be blamed for the temperature increases on Earth....

Climate Change/Global Warming is a perfectly natural phenomenon and nothing we do can accelerate it or deccelerate it....



Since Mars rotation isn't the same as Earths, then can we expect exact temp increases across all planets?

I just like you guys to dig your hole a little deeper before we put you out of your misery.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #101 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:41pm
 
____ wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:38pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:29pm:
____ wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:25pm:
Yes and in the last 3 years ?


There is a reason why the denialist dumped this line a couple of years ago ... keep on digging


Ohhh, ok.

So now we're looking at 3 year periods of temperature change are we?

On planets billions of years old, we are starting to look at 3 year graphs.

What about by month?

Or shall we start to measure over weekends too?





Keep on digging since some planets have not followed earth's warming trend ... especially in the last three years.

Don't tell me you didn't know this since denials dumped the solar angle like hotcakes a couple of years ago.



But given that other planets ALSO HAVE warmed up as a direct result of solar activity.

Mars being the most like-for-like planet in the solar system by the way to Earth.

Neptune, Triton also warmed up.
Pluto has warmed up despite travelling AWAY from the Sun.

So if these have through natural phenomenon, who are you to decide Earth's is not natural?
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #102 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:45pm
 
____ wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:41pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:33pm:
____ wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:25pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:22pm:
CLIMATE change sceptics have seized on news that Mars is heating up to back their claim that humans are not causing Earthly global warming.

The research comes from US planetary scientists, who suggest the Red Planet warmed by about 0.65C from the 1970s to the 1990s, similar to Earth's 0.6C average temperature rise during the 20th Century.

"It could be coincidental or it might be the needle in the haystack," said climatologist William Kininmonth, former head of the National Climate Centre in Melbourne.

"It's an interesting observation, as it's the same time period as Earth's temperature has been warming."

Mr Kininmonth said the research, published in the journal Nature, showed there was enough natural climate variability to account for global warming on Earth.

Not so, claimed Neville Nicholls, a climate scientist at Monash University in Melbourne.


Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.

"The paper is interesting but it hasn't got anything to do with the question of human impact on global warming on Earth," Dr Nicholls said.

"It's not an excuse to argue that humans are not causing global warming on Earth."

The research was done by a team led by Lori Fenton of the NASA Ames Research Centre at Moffett Field, California.

They used a computer model based on those devised to study global warming on Earth, adding Martian features such as a cold, airless surface and a shifting south polar ice cap while subtracting Earth's oceans and atmosphere.

Dr Fenton's group found that annual variation in the solar radiation reflected from the surface of Mars - its "albedo" - contributed to the warming by causing more blowing dust.

Over the past 30 years the dust swept clean large swaths of the planet's surface, reducing reflected radiation.

The result was a "positive feedback loop" between dust, wind, albedo and temperature.

"It's a nice piece of work," said UNSW climate scientist Andy Pitman.

"But there are no implications for Earth."

Professor Pitman was lead author of the climate modelling section of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report released in February.

Professor Pitman disputed Associate Professor Franks' claim that changes in Earth's albedo had a bigger influence on climate than greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

"Albedo is included in climate models," Professor Pitman said.

"It can have a local effect but cannot explain the observed warming record."

The Australian


http://www.perthnow.com.au/mars-warming-like-earth/story-e6frg4nl-1111113290972




Yes and in the last 3 years ?


There is a reason why the denialist dumped this line a couple of years ago ... keep on digging


You can keep struggling with this line of argument greens, but it's not going to work....

Earth's temp increased (in a century) by a little less than Mars' temp increased in 20 years.....There are NO known industries on Mars, so action other than 'natural' cannot be the cause of the Mars increase.

And since the Earth has warmed slower than Mars then human action cannot be blamed for the temperature increases on Earth....

Climate Change/Global Warming is a perfectly natural phenomenon and nothing we do can accelerate it or deccelerate it....



Since Mars rotation isn't the same as Earths, then can we expect exact temp increases across all planets?

I just like you guys to dig your hole a little deeper before we put you out of your misery.


And since there is no GHG or Co2 producing industries on Mars, if Earth's climate is being affected by man's actions, then Mars shouldn't have warmed at all......According the the environmentalist manifesto..
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #103 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:46pm
 
Quote:
Climate Change/Global Warming is a perfectly natural phenomenon and nothing we do can accelerate it or deccelerate it....


It amazes me just how stupid people are that think all the pollution of the industrial age and particularly the last 60 years could not affect the environment. At least they're a minority. Shocked
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Cost Of Liberal Party's Inaction On CC
Reply #104 - Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:47pm
 
skippy. wrote on Dec 9th, 2010 at 12:46pm:
Quote:
Climate Change/Global Warming is a perfectly natural phenomenon and nothing we do can accelerate it or deccelerate it....


It amazes me just how stupid people are that think all the pollution of the industrial age and particularly the last 60 years could not affect the environment. At least they're a minority. Shocked



The 'environment' or the climate???

And NO they're NOT the same thing...
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 15
Send Topic Print