skippy. wrote on Dec 10
th, 2010 at 4:15pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Dec 10
th, 2010 at 1:52pm:
skippy. wrote on Dec 10
th, 2010 at 1:43pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Dec 10
th, 2010 at 1:15pm:
skippy. wrote on Dec 10
th, 2010 at 7:44am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Dec 9
th, 2010 at 9:15pm:
skippy. wrote on Dec 9
th, 2010 at 2:58pm:
Climates changes if the factors that influence them fluctuate. To change climate on a global scale, either the amount of heat that is let into the system changes, or the amount of heat that is let out of the system changes.
do you understand this Gizmo?
Yes, and changes to climate affect the environment.....fairly simple..
Now tell me how changes to the environment change the amount of heat in or out of the system.....
Without resorting to any reference to man-made Co2 or Green House Gases....
So you dont really want to know, Ok, stay oblivious to the facts, I never expected you could comprehend it anyway.
Skippy I already understand the ways the Earth heats and cools....I also understand the abolute necessity of Green House Gases in order for human life to exist.....
Exactly we do need them, so why is that you cannot understand that if too much water vapor carbon dioxide methane and nitrous oxide cannot escape earths lower atmosphere it gets trapped and creates heat and traps that heat in the earths atmosphere?.
But is the increase in water vapour and Co2 the 'cause' of warming, or the RESULT of warming????
In other words, if mankind had NEVER under gone the Industrial Revolution, how much would the temperatures have risen between 1850 and 2000???
Well I'm not a scientist, are you?
But it seems reasonable to me that what science is saying is correct, do you really think all the pollution via those gases could be good?
While temperature fluctuation has always happened, why have temperatures risen much more since the industrial revolution?
Think about the logic's, disregard the "greenhouse gas" word you seem to hate so much ( that's why I didn't use it, its easier to understand if you think of the actual gases)and look at it logically. If you released those gases inside a room on a continuous basis what would happen? where could they go? with all of that extra carbon dioxide methane nitrous oxide and water vapour would it get hotter?
So you mean that IF there was NO industrial revolution, or 'man-made' Co2 production, then the temperatures would have increase by exactly the same amount??
That means that 'global warming' or 'climate change' is perfectly natural doesn't it???
What 'pollution'??? neither water vapour nor Co2 are pollutants....both are required for plant growth and 'life' generally....
" If you released those gases inside a room on a continuous basis what would happen? where could they go? with all of that extra carbon dioxide methane nitrous oxide and water vapour would it get hotter?"
No, it might be come difficult to breath, if you don't include oxygen in the mix.....but other than that (providing there's a descent oxygen level), and that there is no heat source, it wouldn't make much difference...