Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum (Read 10743 times)
Cockney Doll
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 333
Queens Park.Sydney
Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Dec 12th, 2010 at 8:46am
 
Fri. 10 Dec. @ 13.32 –

Hamas PM Ismail Haniyeh was quoted last week as saying he will accept a peace deal subject to a referendum of the Palestinian people. However Hamas’ subsequent statements reject this position.

In a WikiLeaks cable detailing a meeting between Senator John Kerry and the Amir of Qatar in February 2010, the Amir is revealed as stating that ‘Hamas will accept the 1967 border with Israel.’ This is in line with a statement by Ismail Haniyeh on 1 December, in which according to Reuters, he said:

    ‘Hamas will respect the results [of a referendum] regardless of whether it differs with its ideology and principles… We accept a Palestinian state on the borders of 1967, with Jerusalem as its capital, the release of Palestinian prisoners, and the resolution of the issue of refugees’.

However, according the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Centre, this statement has since been substantially qualified. The organisation reports that a mere three days later on 4 December:

    ‘… Salah Bardawil, head of Hamas’ “information” department, clarified Ismail Haniya’s remarks, claiming that Hamas would not recognize Israel “under any circumstances’.

Hamas foreign minister Mahmoud al-Zahar is also reported as qualifying the position further on 6 December, stating that Hamas members ‘would not recognize Israel or cede any part of Palestine.’ The report outlined his position further, saying:

    ‘he would not accept a referendum about fundamental principles. He said that a referendum could be held regarding “modus operandi” but not about “the holy places, faith, money, land or personal worth.” He hinted that should a future agreement which ran counter Hamas’ position be accepted, the movement would renounce it as it had renounced the Oslo Accords’.

This follows a statement issued by Hamas on the 29th November in which they state that ‘the land of Palestine is one unified entity from the [Mediterranean] sea to the [Jordan] river, and the private property of the Palestinian people.’


http://justjournalism.com/the-wire/hamas-contradicts-itself-on-peace-referendum/
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #1 - Dec 12th, 2010 at 10:27am
 
As far as I'm aware, Hamas has always said they'd accept a _ceasefire_ in return for the Zionists evacuating what they occupied after 67. But of course, as is only natural, their long term goal is the complete removal of the Zionist entity, back to pre-48 conditions, ie. no Israel.

Do you honestly expect the Palestinian people to ever yearn for anything less? Are you that deluded by your Zionist revisionist propaganda, that you think they're ever going to accept your imposition in their land?
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #2 - Dec 13th, 2010 at 7:31am
 
The thought of a 'peace' referendum involving Hamas is a further contradiction in itself, so I doubt any Israeli's are lying awake at night wondering what might have been.
Hamas will take what land they can get for free from the gullable, and attack Israel regardless.
The only thing Israel needs to know is where to find the Hamas filth.
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21746
A cat with a view
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #3 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 10:40am
 
abu_rashid wrote on Dec 12th, 2010 at 10:27am:
As far as I'm aware, Hamas has always said they'd accept a _ceasefire_ in return for the Zionists evacuating what they occupied after 67. But of course, as is only natural, their long term goal is the complete removal of the Zionist entity, back to pre-48 conditions, ie. no Israel.

Do you honestly expect the Palestinian people to ever yearn for anything less? Are you that deluded by your Zionist revisionist propaganda, that you think they're ever going to accept your imposition in their land?


FACT;
The term, 'Palestinian' people, is a fabrication, it is a propaganda lie.
The 'Palestinian' people do not exist, as an entity.
And in recent history, i.e. prior to 1967, the 'Palestinian' people did not exist.


On a day in 1967, Arab Jordanian moslem occupants of Judea and Samaria, went to bed as Jordanians, and the next day they woke up as 'Palestinians'.
Jordanians lost 'their land' of Judea and Samaria, and East Jerusalem, the land they were occupying, when they, Jordanians, joined forces with surrounding Arab/moslem states, attacked, and unsuccessfully tried to destroy the nascent state of Israel in a war of conquest.


+++
A 'Palestinian' people???
Were there ever a 'Palestinian' people, in recent history???

If so;
Who was the king or president of pre-1948 Palestine?
What was the Palestinian currency?
What did the Palestinians trade?
What was the capital of Palestine?
Did they have a parliament and government?
What were its boundaries?
Who were its historic allies?
Who were its historic enemies?
What wars did it fight?
Where are the artefacts and which museums house these artefacts?
Who were its great statesmen?

Was one of them Yasser Arafat???
The Nobel peace prize winner???

Google
Arafat died a billionaire

...while his adoring people, live in tents, and ghettos.

Q.
Why do the 'Palestinian' people still exist today, as refugees?

Q.
Why can't the poor 'Palestinian' refugees be absorbed into surrounding moslems states [especially Jordan!] ???

A.
Because the poor 'Palestinian' refugees [SO LONG AS THEY EXIST] are a convenient propaganda weapon, with which to 'stir up' world opinion against Israel, on the world media stage.



The 'Palestinian' people???

The term 'Palestinian' people, is a falsehood, and a stinking crock, which the people of the world, to their shame, have embraced.

Google
All nations will turn against Israel

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #4 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 12:23pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Dec 12th, 2010 at 10:27am:
As far as I'm aware, Hamas has always said they'd accept a _ceasefire_ in return for the Zionists evacuating what they occupied after 67. But of course, as is only natural, their long term goal is the complete removal of the Zionist entity, back to pre-48 conditions, ie. no Israel.

Do you honestly expect the Palestinian people to ever yearn for anything less? Are you that deluded by your Zionist revisionist propaganda, that you think they're ever going to accept your imposition in their land?


Yes, they would yearn for that no doubt.
In fact they would dream about it every night as these are a people who are very good at holding their hand out.
Because for what 4 major wars and years and years of terrorism has failed to produce, they would happily accept 'free' land handed over to them for the agreement of a cheap promise (again) of a cessation of terrorist attacks against Israel.
A very cheap price indeed.
Because just like in 2005, it's a promise never meant to be kept.
And the dream of Israel evacuating to the moon or wherever is just that.
A dream.
The State of Israel is going no-where.
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #5 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 10:31pm
 
Yadda yadda yadda, still peddling this revisionist garbage?

Quote:
FACT;
The term, 'Palestinian' people, is a fabrication, it is a propaganda lie.


Well no more or less a 'people' than all the other post-Ottoman 'peoples', the Lebanese, Jordanians, Syrians, Egyptians, Saudis, Iraqis etc. What does it mean to be a 'people'? Perhaps you can define that for us Yadda, and then we can take it from there.

Quote:
The 'Palestinian' people do not exist, as an entity.
And in recent history, i.e. prior to 1967, the 'Palestinian' people did not exist.


Really? So when they adopted the Palestinian flag as their national symbol in 1964, they must've had pretty good foresight, since they didn't even exist yet for another 3 years.  Grin

Yadda, we're all adults here, not children, enough of the fairytales and ridiculous technicalities. When the British divided the Ottoman lands up, there were people living in all of the lands (spare us the 'land without a people for a people without a land' nonsense) . Those living in what the British called Palestine were called Palestinians from that point on, just as those living in Lebanon were called Lebanese and those living in Iraq were called Iraqis.  Even though the term does predate this anyway, in the literature of Arab nationalists such as the bi-weekly newspaper called "Filasteen" which was published by Greek Orthodox Christian Palestinian nationalists in Jaffa from way back in 1911, even during Ottoman times, and in fact if we want to go way back into Arab history, in the early years of Islamic rule, it was called 'Jund Filasteen' for a period. But it's all irrelevant anyway. I couldn't give a crap about the name, it's the people. The Arabs/Muslims who were living there when the British and Zionists arrived have been expelled, that's all that's relevant here. You can spew out all the crap you like, but it doesn't alter this basic fact.

Quote:
On a day in 1967, Arab Jordanian moslem occupants of Judea and Samaria, went to bed as Jordanians, and the next day they woke up as 'Palestinians'.


The 'Jordanian' identity was created after the Palestinian one, so that doesn't make a lot of sense.

Anyway... moving along.

Quote:
the nascent state of Israel


Thank you. That says it all.

Nascent, meaning it didn't previously exist there, meaning it was an imposition, an invasion, an unwanted intrusion into someone elses land.

Quote:
If so;
Who was the king or president of pre-1948 Palestine?


Ok, I'm going to just assume you're bit slow here.

Prior to the British invasion the entire Middle East was part of the Islamic Caliphate. The "King" was called sultan Muhammad Reshad, the Prime Minister (Grand Wazir), not President, was called Ahmed İzzet Pasha.

Quote:
What was the Palestinian currency?


*raises hand* I know I know, Palestinian pound.

...

Quote:
What did the Palestinians trade?


Have a read of this if you're sincerely interested in reading about commerce in Palestine in the late Ottoman period. (also I suspect you are not).

Quote:
What was the capital of Palestine?


The regional capital during the Ottoman period? al-Quds.of course, as it was during the British occupation period as well.

Anyway I'm tiring... I think you get it. And if you don't, not much more I can do for you.

Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21746
A cat with a view
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #6 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 9:45am
 
Very good reply abu.

But....your very impressive image of a Palestinian pound, was printed by the British authorities, who administered 'Palestine' after WWI.

But please, where is your image of the Palestinian pound, prior to the British administration of  'Palestine', prior to WWI???
Everyone knows, that there was no such currency.
Because i repeat, there was no such people, or nation, known as 'Palestine' [in recent history].

And thank you for confirming that 'Palestine' was previously just one part of a group of lands within, and administered by, the Ottoman empire.

+++
But Abu,
There is a 'Palestinian' state.
There is a 'Palestinian' homeland.
It is called Jordan.

IMAGES...

...
http://zioneocon.blogspot.com/map%20partition%20transjordan.gif

...
http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/oren/Transjordan%20separation%201922.jpg




Are Israelis occupying 'Palestinian' lands???

No.

Historically (WWI), legally and, by applying ISLAM's own standards, Israelis have an absolute right to the land which they have secured.
Why so???
#1,
War has always been regarded as a huge 'reset button' on property rights.
And prior to WWI, the land which constitutes present day Israel, was not, and never was owned, possessed, or administered under the authority of local 'Palestinians'.
Turkey [the Ottoman empire] 'inherited' the Jewish homeland, which was 'acquired' [by moslems] through warfare / Jihad in the region [in the 600's AD].

see, ISLAM 101
http://www.jihadwatch.org/islam-101.html

Turkey eventually lawfully lost control over its administered territories in the region, as a consequence of its participation in WWI.
And, those territories also included that land which was previously the ancient Jewish homeland, the land area today known as Israel.

Post WWI, the world powers of that time decided to carve up, as they saw fit, those territories previously administered by Turkey.
And the world powers of that time determined to set aside an area of those territories, a small fraction of those territories, as a national Jewish homeland.
These actions, by world powers, post WWI were lawful.


The Israelis have an absolute right to the land they have secured.
#2,
Moslems themselves declare [and ISLAMIC doctrine confirms] that all non-moslem lands secured by warfare for ISLAM, lawfully belongs to moslems.
And while some may accuse Israel of occupying 'Palestinian' lands, by applying ISLAM's own standards, Israel today has legally acquired their land, of Israel.
Since the war of 1967, a war which Israel did not instigate, Israel has a moral right to all of the land they secured.
And please note that all of 'Israel's wars' in the region, have all been defensive, and were not instigated by Israel.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #7 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 9:54am
 
Good post Yadda.
Unfortunately, the Jordanians aren't interested in allowing the Palestinians out of their 'camps' to settle in Jordan as citizens, primarily because their are so many of them.
And after tearing up all the dual Palestinian / Jordanian passports recently only demonstrates further that the Jordanians don't want a bar of the Palestinians.
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21746
A cat with a view
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #8 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 10:00am
 
Yadda wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 9:45am:
And the world powers of that time determined to set aside an area of those territories, a small fraction of those territories, as a national Jewish homeland.
These actions, by world powers, post WWI were lawful.




Yes Abu, those poor, poor, 'Palestinian' people, who have nowhere to live.
Shock, horror.
Coz those wicked Joos stole their land!!
Boo hoo! Boo hoo! Boo hoo!
/sarc off


...


http://www.protestwarrior.com/nimages/signs/large/pw_sign_22.gif

And Allah Akbar to you Abu.




And while all nations will turn against, and soon come against Israel...
Israel, plus the God of Israel, equals, a majority.



Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21746
A cat with a view
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #9 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 10:46am
 
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 9:54am:
Unfortunately, the Jordanians aren't interested in allowing the Palestinians out of their 'camps' to settle in Jordan as citizens, primarily because their are so many of them.
And after tearing up all the dual Palestinian / Jordanian passports recently only demonstrates further that the Jordanians don't want a bar of the Palestinians.



Jordanians and 'Palestinians' are ethnically, the same people.

Nothing will prevent, or turn away, what is coming upon the heads, of those people who refer to themselves, as 'Palestinians' [and Jordanians].
They are choosing their own fate.
Just as, in this life, each of us does.




"...Because thou hast had a perpetual hatred, and hast shed the blood of the children of Israel by the force of the sword in the time of their calamity, in the time that their iniquity had an end:
Therefore, as I live, saith the Lord GOD, I will prepare thee unto blood, and blood shall pursue thee: sith thou hast not hated blood, even blood shall pursue thee.
....And thou shalt know that I am the LORD, and that I have heard all thy blasphemies which thou hast spoken against the mountains of Israel, saying, They are laid desolate, they are given us to consume.
Thus with your mouth ye have boasted against me, and have multiplied your words against me: I have heard them.
Thus saith the Lord GOD; When the whole earth rejoiceth, I will make thee desolate.
As thou didst rejoice at the inheritance of the house of Israel, because it was desolate, so will I do unto thee: thou shalt be desolate, O mount Seir, and all Idumea, even all of it: and they shall know that I am the LORD."

Ezekiel 35


"...Thus with your mouth ye have boasted against me,"

"Allah Akbar!", literally means, 'Allah is greater'
...greater, than the God of Israel, is the implication.



In the context of Ezekiel 35,

Idumea = = Edom = = Jordan = = 'Palestinians'


Psalms 83:4
They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48994
At my desk.
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #10 - Dec 16th, 2010 at 8:52pm
 
Yadda wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 10:00am:
Yadda wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 9:45am:
And the world powers of that time determined to set aside an area of those territories, a small fraction of those territories, as a national Jewish homeland.
These actions, by world powers, post WWI were lawful.




Yes Abu, those poor, poor, 'Palestinian' people, who have nowhere to live.
Shock, horror.
Coz those wicked Joos stole their land!!
Boo hoo! Boo hoo! Boo hoo!
/sarc off


http://www.protestwarrior.com/nimages/signs/large/pw_sign_22.gif


http://www.protestwarrior.com/nimages/signs/large/pw_sign_22.gif

And Allah Akbar to you Abu.




And while all nations will turn against, and soon come against Israel...
Israel, plus the God of Israel, equals, a majority.





Doesn't Abu consider Spain to be part of Muslim lands?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
salad in
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5941
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #11 - Dec 17th, 2010 at 6:56am
 
abu_rashid wrote on Dec 12th, 2010 at 10:27am:
... back to pre-48 conditions, ie. no Israel.


If we are going to return to a more romantic era what about 'to the victor go the spoils?' Isn't Israel entitled to keep the real estate secured by fighting?
Back to top
 

The ALP, the progressive party, the party of ideas, the workers' friend, is the only Australian political party to roast four young Australians in roof cavities. SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #12 - Dec 17th, 2010 at 7:12am
 
As far as I'm aware the age of conquest has come to an end. International law clearly states that it's illegal to settle civilians into occupied territories. Israel is one big case of this, the British occupied a territory and brought in foreign civilians to settle it.

If however you'd prefer to return to that age... so be it, I'm sure the Muslims can oblige. You'd be risking a lot by doing so though.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #13 - Dec 17th, 2010 at 10:11am
 
abu_rashid wrote on Dec 17th, 2010 at 7:12am:
As far as I'm aware the age of conquest has come to an end. International law clearly states that it's illegal to settle civilians into occupied territories. Israel is one big case of this, the British occupied a territory and brought in foreign civilians to settle it.

If however you'd prefer to return to that age... so be it, I'm sure the Muslims can oblige. You'd be risking a lot by doing so though.



Been there, done that Abu.
Thousands upon thousands of their bones still lie in the desert along with the thousands of burnt out twisted tanks and aircraft from the 4 wars of their making which they all magnificently lost along with more land.
And Israel came out stronger after every single war.
The genie is out of the bottle Abu, and it won't go back in.
Israel is going nowhere.
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Hamas contradicts itself on peace referendum
Reply #14 - Dec 17th, 2010 at 12:15pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Dec 17th, 2010 at 7:12am:
As far as I'm aware the age of conquest has come to an end. International law clearly states that it's illegal to settle civilians into occupied territories. Israel is one big case of this, the British occupied a territory and brought in foreign civilians to settle it.If however you'd prefer to return to that age... so be it, I'm sure the Muslims can oblige. You'd be risking a lot by doing so though.


Abu, the international law you're referring to is the 4th Geneva Convention...and Article 49 states that "The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies", which the British didn't actually do....Oh and the GC-IV wasn't adopted until August 1949 any way....
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print