buzzanddidj wrote on Dec 17
th, 2010 at 1:27pm:
[q link=1292478829/135#139 date=1292555811]
Dnarever wrote on Dec 17
th, 2010 at 12:57pm:
I do not recall Bolt calling on the previous Lib'n PM to resign when he had ordered the illegal invasion of a couintry by mistake, he got half the reasons wrong and lied to support the other half.
good try dnare... NO AUSTRALIAN LOST HIS/HER LIFE IN IRAQ... DUE TO ENEMY FIRE.... .
No,
Just 100,000 plus civilian men, women and children
due to "friendly fire"
And the one ADF personel suicide
And the 5,000 plus US defence personel - a figure higher than
the combined 9/11 fatalities
(and it eventuated that IRAQ had no involvement)i
[/quote]
SO NOWHOWARD WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FRIENDLY FIRE...
YOU WANT TO BLAME HIM FOR EVERYTHING EVEN A YOUNG MANS SUICIDE/ACCIDENTAL DEATH. MY GOD!!!!!
more people have died in Iraq due to insurgents but dont let that get in the way of Howard bashing..America everyone! would have been out of there years ago if it wasnt for them.
YET YOU WONT BLAME RUDD/GILLARD FOR ALL THE DEATHS ON THEIR WATCH WILL YOU?????..
in fact you have bent over backwards to get them off the hook over
THE 4 YOUNG MEN DYING IN ROOF CAVITIES.
the govt had not a thing to do with it according to you even though they were they only ones with the power to stop the program.
and what about this boat happening 30 people dead and counting...
do you honestly expect anyone on here to believe you wouldnt hold the Libs responsible if this was their idea/policy!!!
like I said to dnare this is about DEATH people dying.. in this case 30 so far on a missguided mission...
but like your messiah who managed to get the PEOPLE OVERBOARD in her first half adozen words on this topic..
the desperate always have to bring up the past as if that makes everything OK>>...
so if the Libs bring in a program/policy and peoiple die... thats alright isnt it now?????
what a way to think.