I have stated this was an accident and a failure of the system......I have not blamed anyone or any organization (accept for the people smugglers)......the inquiry set up by the government will determine where the system failed and what measures can be taken to prevent ANY vessels entering Australian waters undetected.....especially where there is a known intrusion point......the conservatives are the ones blaming everyone and claiming this was not an accident......how predictable.....Australia should do what it said it would do and honor it's international commitment.....we are judged by our actions and what we do against adversity.....take a look at your selves and the way you are acting......it is not a pretty sight!!!

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 18^th, 2010 at 4:48am:


When it's become apparent that this autocratic government has an aversion towards anything that publishes public opinion or  truth, be it bloggers, columnists, journalists, diarists, website owners...or even the general public and freedom writers, those with a humble opinion.

What politician was it again who set out to conspire against it's own people 'in secret' with our internet service providers shortly before an election?

http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/no-minister-90-of-web-snoop-doc...

Gillard!

And yes, the recent Wikileak concerning Gillard having eyed off the top-job well before Rudd lost popularity, this and having liaised with the US about her intention speaks for itself.

Gillard would have us believe she virtually stumbled onto the top job out of mere necessity, ie "someone had to do it"...when in fact, she had been planning this 'topple' since Rudd was elected, if not before even. Hence her move from the far-left faction to the centre.

In other words, our Gillards the treacherous back-stabbing closet socialist with a far-left agenda aligned with another far-left party (the Greens) to cat-scratch her way to victory.

I'm not going to say it again......  bugger it, I think I will....



Most of the libs would have seen this coming, but the Labor supporters were caught off guard, were mesmerised by their 'red herring' and had no idea that what they were indeed voting for was anything but the traditional Labor party as they knew it to be.

Yes she should be sacked,for deceiving her nation and her colleagues, and attempting to cover her tracks as she set about publicly defaming an Australian in strife overseas who dared to expose the malignant state of her government.

Rotten to the core.

It's hardly surprising why the left and right factions of both Labor and Greens remain divided over Wikileaks, and a number of other key-policy areas, pretty soon, Gillard will be a one woman army, her against the rest of Australia given her popularity's declining by the day.

Funny, we haven't heard much about any recent poll results, re- Gillards popularity, and would this be because her popularity's dropped even lower than Rudds ever did, thus would beg the question, why aren't Labors factional-warlords replacing her too?


Bill Shortens plan is humming along nicely, with Arbib now a US Spy and out of the game after having conspired with the US to topple Rudd, I should think Bill Shorten and GG mummy-in-law would be very pleased with themselves.

There is noone else left but Shorten to run for the ALP leadership, as the rest are so sh1t stained ....and even he has his dirty laundry your more conservative Australians might feel squeamish about.

She's even lost the support of her more loyal independents.

Without the Greens and the Independents backing, what is left of a Labor minority government?

NOTHING!

They are just in it for themselves now... i'm sure of it.


Time this government called it a day!

Bring on the next election.

With rioting ongoing at the Christmas Island Prison, the Police and security should be authorized to use force and fire on the rioters if necessary to restore order.  Get real Gillard and secure or borders or resign a failure.

darkhall67 wrote on Dec 18^th, 2010 at 4:10pm:


They were SUDANESE. give your left-wing racial crying a break for a minute. Like it or not, they sudanese population is violent, law breaking and almost entirely unemployed and virtually unemployable.

My comment that they were sudanese was by matter of commentary only. At the time of the police report I thought they were actually Jamaican.

I await your pointless retort on my 'racist' reference to Jamaicans.

Oh, and I saw your sterotype on MSN today - the buss passengers that sat and did nothing while 5 others assaulted a pregnant girl.

longweekend58 wrote on Dec 18^th, 2010 at 4:19pm:




It was irrelevant to the topic.

You were talking about being anti war and anti violence.

NOTHING was relevant about mentioning their nationality.

NOTHING.



And i have no idea what you are talking about with my "sterotype" or people on a buss.

He's NOT a #$%&"*+` journalist.

philperth2010 wrote on Dec 18^th, 2010 at 12:41pm:



phil look at this way,.. you would have to admit if the boot was on the other foot you would be claiming it was the Libs fault.. look you cant help yourself you and others on here have constantly brought up the SIEVX. and Tampa.. even gillard brought up the children overboard..

come on as soon as something happens on your watch.. you immediately hit the google button...

lets not pretend you are not all squirming here and have been for almost 3 years.. not a whole lot to be proud of and one bloody expensive blooper after another.

now i  understand that, but pulllllllease. dont lets pretend as I said if the boot was on the other foot. your side wouldnt also be asking at least questions..as well as digging in the knife.

I did say in another thread.. that your side are very criticle of the right on here for saying anything..even all the phoney tears as they call it.. however none of them ever come up with any answers to stop this from happening... they can solve the problems of CLIMATE CHANGE.

HOHUM

but have no answers to the boat people...funny that!


sorry if thats not a pretty sight.. and I dont speak for any other righties on here either phil I only ever speak for myself.

darkhall67 wrote on Dec 18^th, 2010 at 4:34pm:





OK I WILL BUY INTO IT... WHAT IS HE THEN WHAT DO THEY PAY HIM FOR??????