skippy. wrote on Dec 20
th, 2010 at 3:51pm:
Soren wrote on Dec 20
th, 2010 at 3:40pm:
skippy. wrote on Dec 20
th, 2010 at 3:28pm:
Soren wrote on Dec 20
th, 2010 at 3:21pm:
skippy. wrote on Dec 20
th, 2010 at 3:13pm:
Why doesn't Australia take its "fair share" of these people, considering our actions in invading their countries are one of the major reasons they need to flee their homes.
There were a lot even before the shooting started in October 2001 in Afghanista and March 2003 in Iraq.
Here's the graph from the Parliament House library:
http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bn/sp/BoatArrivals_002.gif and your point? we take way less than our fair share compered to Europe and the USA or even Canada, why?
We are the
6th richest nation in the world, per capita,according to the international monetary fund, but come in at
77th in terms of refugees per gross domestic product per capita. In real terms, this is 1.1 refugee per 1000 inhabitants and 0.6 refugees per GDP per capita.
ANd my point? We do not have a 'fair share' of illegal arrivals, we do not
have to take any. They are not here as a conseqence of AUstralia's participation in the wars. We have not invaded Sri Lanka or Iran but half the dead off Christmas Island were Iranians.
There is no link between being a rich nation and being a destination for boats. Kuwait, Singapore, Brunai, Japan, the UAE are not taking refugees even though they are richer than us.
International Monetary Fund (2010)[1] World Bank (2009)[2] CIA World Factbook[3]
Rank Country US$
1 Luxembourg 104,390
2 Norway 84,543
3 Qatar[4] 74,422
4 Switzerland 67,074
5 Denmark 55,113
6 Australia 54,869
7 Sweden 47,667
Wrong again ,swallow, none of those countries are richer than Aus per capita.Not according to the international monetary fund.
Don't be autistic with your lists. The point is that there is no link between being a rich nation and being a destination for boats, you little red cock-fantasist devil. Big numbers may meshmerise you but it DOESN'T matter how rich a country is, it does not
have to take anybody entering illegally.
BTW, CIA factbook you quote actually shows Australia as the 17th. But the point is that it is irrelevant. By your stupid reckoning, Bermuda, for example, should take a LOT MORE of those boats... Maybe they do, we just never hear from them again.
Rank Country Intl. $ Year
1 Liechtenstein 122,100 2007 est.
2 Qatar 121,700 2009 est.
3 Luxembourg 78,000 2009 est.
— Bermuda 69,900 2004 est.
4 Norway 58,600 2009 est.
— Jersey 57,000 2005 est.
5 Kuwait 54,100 2009 est.
6
Singapore 50,300 2009 est. 7
Brunei 50,100 2009 est. — Faroe Islands 48,200 2008 est.
8 United States 46,400 2009 est.
9 Andorra 44,900 2008
— Guernsey 44,600 2005
— Cayman Islands 43,800 2004 est.
—
Hong Kong 42,700 2009 est. 10 Ireland 42,200 2009 est.
11
United Arab Emirates 42,000 2009 est.
12 San Marino 41,900 2007
13 Switzerland 41,700 2009 est.
14 Iceland 39,600 2009 est.
15 Austria 39,400 2009 est.
16 Netherlands 39,200 2009 est.
17 Australia 38,800 2009 est