cods, Kim wrote this.

Also, if you go to Derryn Hinch's page after 1pm today he is releasing her story. As told to him by Kim herself, no secondhand propaganda.
.............................................................................
Is it worth it?
Throughout everything, I've been a very strong woman, I have never backed down from anything in my life before.
But just recently, I have realised and listened to what a lot of people have said.. And, I don't think I can be that strong woman anymore. I've tried so hard to keep it going, even to the point of denying sleep and food to prove to myself how strong I was.

Today, after having a big night in the city, I sat at Flinders Street station for 3 hours, crying and reassuring everyone who asked me if "I was okay?" that "I was fine, I'm always fine, thanks."

I eventually jumped on the train and headed back towards Frankston, in hope that my parents would let me back into their lives, that they could see what state I was in, and realise that I finally agreed to getting help.
After walking the whole way from Frankston station to their house, (about 16kms), I arrived at their house and walked in, I ran to my mum and hugged her, not just hugged her, I mean almost suffocated her - That's how much I wanted her to love me again. I don't know if many people have been in a situation like that before, but I can tell you that just thinking about it now breaks my heart.

After pouring my heart out to my mother apologising for everything that I'd done this year, she cried with me and comforted me, it felt good just to have her arms around me for the first time in a week. That moment was quickly destroyed when my father told me to leave and get out - To which I was speechless, I thought they were going to say yes to me coming back into their home, so my heart was shattered into a million pieces when I heard those two words "GET OUT", although I'm sure they could relate because that's how they probably felt when I released the photo's.

I had one place I could go to stay tonight, and that was my best friends parents house. They're great people, and have supported me from the start - They have never judged me. I respect them immensely for that.

So, now I sit here on the computer, after reading Derryn Hinch's latest blog (Read Here), and I definitely respect that man, Ive never met him, but after reading his last few blog posts, it quite easy to see that he is catching onto what the real truth is. He is raising alot of questions that haven't been answered before, and more to the point - Has made the connection that original story is the real problem.

A lot of you thought this was all over in mid May-June, but I can tell you, when you hold on to so many lies, there really is no ending until you crack one day and release them.

My point being, there was something illegal that occurred, in fact many things; But unfortunately at the time, I was a 16 year old girl, who was very vulnerable and could be intimidated by anyone.

I'll leave it at that, I'm just trying to say that I have been perceived very horribly in the media, and I think I would be judged differently when I tell my side of the story, but in the meantime, I think I'll leave those deceptive lies from St.Kilda in the Victorian Police's hands.

Thank-you to all of the supporters, and I hope that all of the haters haven't completely made their minds up yet.
-Kim, x x
@Its_K_Isabella

The Missing Link

When life sort of goes on an indulgent hold over Christmas you have plenty of time to relax and read and think. Especially when it’s a painful waste of time watching the cricket. And especially when you don’t drink.

So I’ve had plenty of time to reflect on the dickilinks scandal. On what I’ve written, heard and read in recent days, including a slew of emails from some of the people who have made more than one million hits on www.hinch.net since I started these holiday observations last week.

If you took some of the more scandalous ones as gospel you would believe that many top AFL players had a white Christmas – and I’m not talking about snow (sniff, sniff). And more than a few are concerned about post Grand Final sex tapes which would make Rob Lowe look like a Trappist monk.

What has been niggling me is the missing link. Why has the St. Kilda Football Club taken to a teenage girl with a legal meat axe?  Why did AFL chief Andrew Demetriou have twenty meetings (he says) with the girl?

I doubt he’s had that many meetings with the TV honchos he’s trying to get a billion plus dollars out of for the next broadcast rights.

As one emailer pointed out:

St Kilda and the AFL are professionally run big businesses. They are not charitable institutions frequently meeting, let alone offering counselling and support  to, disturbed young women who stray in off the street. So why was and is the AFL so keen to offer support to Ms [ name deleted DH] if, as the AFL maintains, her complaints were investigated earlier this year and the accused players were exonerated?

What were/are they scared of? Why is it imperative to discredit this girl -- or  ‘that woman’ as Ricky Nixon, Reiwoldt’s manager, calls her.

Is it so that by shredding her reputation anything that comes out in future will be tainted and discredited?

So what is the missing link? To find it you have to go back to the beginning. Pretty obvious really. Where did this all start?

It started at a footy clinic when several Saints stars visited a high school in Melbourne’s south-east.

The 16-year-old girl later had sex with two St. Kilda players and got pregnant. Got spurned. Got dumped. Got tossed aside like a used jockstrap.

As the Herald Sun reported back in May:

THE AFL and police will take no action against St Kilda players accused of having sex with a schoolgirl after an investigation today cleared them of wrongdoing.

The AFL says its thorough investigation backed the players' version of events that they had not met the girl at a school football clinic in February, as she claimed.

It has backed the players' claims that they were first introduced to the girl after St Kilda's Round 1 victory over the Swans in Sydney on March 27.

"All available evidence indicates that the players had no contact with the young woman at an AFL player appearance at the student’s school, but met for the first time some weeks later after an AFL match following Round 1 of the 2010 season," the league said in a statement.

AFL football operations manager Adrian Anderson said Victoria Police had interviewed the student, provided a report and "determined they would take no action, as no unlawful activity had occurred".

There are two vital clues in that story and the first supports the second.
‘All available evidence indicates that the players had no contact with the young woman… at the student’s school’.  And Anderson’s assertion ‘no unlawful activity had occurred.’

If the first is true then so is the second. In one of last week’s blogs I said of a St. Kilda player ‘Why hasn’t he been charged at least with unlawful carnal knowledge or sexual penetration of a child?’

As several people pointed out on Twitter: I was wrong. The current law in Victoria puts the age of consent at 16. In the past it was 16 if the partner was under 18 -- and 18 if the partner was over 21.

So how come a policeman has been charged with sexual penetration of a child and using his position to procure sex with a child? Because he was in a position of authority. Duty of care comes into play.

That second bit is a zinger for the St. Kilda footballers if it were proven that they did meet the 16-year-old at the footy clinic and phone numbers were exchanged.

A good lawyer could prove they were in a position of authority at that school visit if rendezvous plans were made.

Section 48 of the Victorian Crimes Act raises the age of consent to 18 where the child is under the care, supervision or authority of the adult with whom they had sexual intercourse.

S. 48 (1) A person must not take part in an act of sexual penetration with a 16 or 17 year old child to whom he or she is not married and who is under his or her care, supervision or authority.

Penalty:  Level 5 imprisonment (10 years maximum).

This is why it is imperative for the St Kilda players’ defence that they first met the girl weeks later after the game in Sydney.

The Sunday Age yesterday had a story about ‘Saints teen: track star who took a wrong turn’.

That story says that after the high school clinic she went to Sydney for an athletics event and after the Saints-Swans match waited outside the change rooms.

‘They didn’t even question my age from the start because they recognised me from the school clinic’.

Hang on. The AFL says they didn’t meet at the clinic.

cont......

Yes, the girl has lied but then that lying is excused.

In at least 3 articles it proves where the AFL and the Victorian Police have lied, it must be something to do with the secret deal they have to look after each other.

codswal wrote on Dec 28^th, 2010 at 11:38am:



lol....deny deny deny

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Dec 28^th, 2010 at 10:15am:


Well pansi, I think someone may have been lying to the 'Human Headline'....AGAIN.

Unless the rules for Victoria are completely different to the rest of Australia (and the Western world), the police will NOT really let you leave an interview until it's over,  AND most especially not to talk to the people you're making the complaint against..

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 28^th, 2010 at 10:43am:



Lies don`t bother fanatics. To a fanatic, the end justifies the means, in this case, a thrill kill.  Somehow, Ben Cousins has even crept into the attack, I had no idea that he was connected to this case.