Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print
Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools. (Read 13149 times)
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #30 - Jan 7th, 2011 at 3:15pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 7th, 2011 at 2:43pm:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 7th, 2011 at 7:23am:
As a general principle I am against public funding for private schools, and have really tried to support the state system. Eventually however, after two years at a bloody awful state high school, we did send one of our children to a private school.  This was not a fancy or hugely expensive school,  just a local catholic boys high, however the quality of the teachers ,the education and discipline provided was vastly superior. That things are this way is wrong, that we had to send our son to a private school to ensure he got a decent education still annoys me, but that is, unfortunately, the way things are at the moment.

There are arguments for public funding  of private schools such as private parents pay taxes and are entitled to have a share of the education dollar, and that not funding these schools will only ensure that they become even more elitist and exclusive for those that can afford them, however I don't believe that these outweigh the benefits of properly funding state education.  

More money is itself not the whole answer. The entire system needs to be overhauled, all the trendy touchy feely PC crap eliminated, incompetent teachers removed and proper discipline restored. Only then will we have an education system like the one that once saw Australia a world leader in education.

Addendum: I have followed gizmos link and have noticed that there is no attribution on the OP.


I'm against public moneys funding private schools too...
I mean, isn't that the whole point to the different classifications, PUBLIC(funded) Schools as opposed to PRIVATE(funded) Schools???
If they're government funded, why are they called 'Private'??


Oh and I only included the link to show that imcrookonit didn't actually write it him/herself..


Are you against private/public partnerships as well? What about the notion of Gov delivering its servics by partnering with the private sector? Roads are built by the private sector. Govt Buildings and hospitals are built by the private sector. Arae you suggesting that this should all be ONLY done by govt departments because other wise you are SUBSIDISING private industry with govt money! When private industry (such as schools) do a demonstrably BETTER job than govt in providing a service then govt should bow out and let private industry do the job - better and cheaper.

Perhaps a solution would be to get rid of public operated schools entirely and have the govt pay the $10,000 per student directly to a private education body to proved no-fee education. It would provide a higher standard of education for no extra cost.

Thoughts?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Sir lastnail
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30071
Gender: male
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #31 - Jan 7th, 2011 at 3:33pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 7th, 2011 at 3:15pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 7th, 2011 at 2:43pm:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 7th, 2011 at 7:23am:
As a general principle I am against public funding for private schools, and have really tried to support the state system. Eventually however, after two years at a bloody awful state high school, we did send one of our children to a private school.  This was not a fancy or hugely expensive school,  just a local catholic boys high, however the quality of the teachers ,the education and discipline provided was vastly superior. That things are this way is wrong, that we had to send our son to a private school to ensure he got a decent education still annoys me, but that is, unfortunately, the way things are at the moment.

There are arguments for public funding  of private schools such as private parents pay taxes and are entitled to have a share of the education dollar, and that not funding these schools will only ensure that they become even more elitist and exclusive for those that can afford them, however I don't believe that these outweigh the benefits of properly funding state education. 

More money is itself not the whole answer. The entire system needs to be overhauled, all the trendy touchy feely PC crap eliminated, incompetent teachers removed and proper discipline restored. Only then will we have an education system like the one that once saw Australia a world leader in education.

Addendum: I have followed gizmos link and have noticed that there is no attribution on the OP.


I'm against public moneys funding private schools too...
I mean, isn't that the whole point to the different classifications, PUBLIC(funded) Schools as opposed to PRIVATE(funded) Schools???
If they're government funded, why are they called 'Private'??


Oh and I only included the link to show that imcrookonit didn't actually write it him/herself..


Are you against private/public partnerships as well? What about the notion of Gov delivering its servics by partnering with the private sector? Roads are built by the private sector. Govt Buildings and hospitals are built by the private sector. Arae you suggesting that this should all be ONLY done by govt departments because other wise you are SUBSIDISING private industry with govt money! When private industry (such as schools) do a demonstrably BETTER job than govt in providing a service then govt should bow out and let private industry do the job - better and cheaper.

Perhaps a solution would be to get rid of public operated schools entirely and have the govt pay the $10,000 per student directly to a private education body to proved no-fee education. It would provide a higher standard of education for no extra cost.

Thoughts?


Yes and look what has happened to privatisation of power ? Bills going up every month Sad And what of privatization of public transport ?? Come to Melbourne. What a complete disaster Sad

Essential services should never be privatised. That's what we pay Governments to do and they should do it instead of offloading it onto scammers that can't run things properly Sad

And who would be the scammers operating these private schools ? Your good opportunist libbo religious mates Sad
Back to top
 

In August 2021, Newcastle Coroner Karen Dilks recorded that Lisa Shaw had died “due to complications of an AstraZeneca COVID vaccination”.
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #32 - Jan 7th, 2011 at 9:05pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 7th, 2011 at 3:15pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 7th, 2011 at 2:43pm:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 7th, 2011 at 7:23am:
As a general principle I am against public funding for private schools, and have really tried to support the state system. Eventually however, after two years at a bloody awful state high school, we did send one of our children to a private school.  This was not a fancy or hugely expensive school,  just a local catholic boys high, however the quality of the teachers ,the education and discipline provided was vastly superior. That things are this way is wrong, that we had to send our son to a private school to ensure he got a decent education still annoys me, but that is, unfortunately, the way things are at the moment.

There are arguments for public funding  of private schools such as private parents pay taxes and are entitled to have a share of the education dollar, and that not funding these schools will only ensure that they become even more elitist and exclusive for those that can afford them, however I don't believe that these outweigh the benefits of properly funding state education.  

More money is itself not the whole answer. The entire system needs to be overhauled, all the trendy touchy feely PC crap eliminated, incompetent teachers removed and proper discipline restored. Only then will we have an education system like the one that once saw Australia a world leader in education.

Addendum: I have followed gizmos link and have noticed that there is no attribution on the OP.


I'm against public moneys funding private schools too...
I mean, isn't that the whole point to the different classifications, PUBLIC(funded) Schools as opposed to PRIVATE(funded) Schools???
If they're government funded, why are they called 'Private'??


Oh and I only included the link to show that imcrookonit didn't actually write it him/herself..


Are you against private/public partnerships as well? What about the notion of Gov delivering its servics by partnering with the private sector? Roads are built by the private sector. Govt Buildings and hospitals are built by the private sector. Arae you suggesting that this should all be ONLY done by govt departments because other wise you are SUBSIDISING private industry with govt money! When private industry (such as schools) do a demonstrably BETTER job than govt in providing a service then govt should bow out and let private industry do the job - better and cheaper.

Perhaps a solution would be to get rid of public operated schools entirely and have the govt pay the $10,000 per student directly to a private education body to proved no-fee education. It would provide a higher standard of education for no extra cost.

Thoughts?


Again, why not stop paying government money to 'private' schools and use the extra money to improve public schools..

Perhaps a solution would be to ONLY fund public schools with public monies and therefore provide a higher standard of education in public schools???
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Prevailing
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #33 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 12:53am
 
Its the Governments solemn legal obligation to fund free education for all.  Ideally we will do away with the private school system and have all schools funded by the tax payer. Smiley
Back to top
 

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men
 
IP Logged
 
ohnoitisnt
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #34 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 5:42am
 
1: The parents from private schools pay tax so why shouldn't the private school receive a subsidy.

2: Some parents scrape and save to send their children to a private school.

3: The subsidy is less per child than the public sector.

4: It would cost the government more if all students went to public school.

5: Jealousy and envy are soul destroying.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ohnoitisnt
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #35 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 5:45am
 

And who would be the scammers operating these private schools ? Your good opportunist libbo religious mates Sad [/quote]

Lastnail check out how many labor, green and independent scammers send their children to private schools.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir lastnail
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30071
Gender: male
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #36 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 12:06pm
 
ohnoitisnt wrote on Jan 8th, 2011 at 5:45am:
Lastnail check out how many labor, green and independent scammers send their children to private schools.


I don't care who goes to those schools. Tax payers money should not be given to church institutions to run schools. If the Government can run most schools and then have to pay for private schools then they should be able to run all schools !
Back to top
 

In August 2021, Newcastle Coroner Karen Dilks recorded that Lisa Shaw had died “due to complications of an AstraZeneca COVID vaccination”.
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 58294
Here
Gender: male
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #37 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 12:12pm
 
I have no problem with funding private schools after adequate funds are provided to public schools.

There are different catagories under private schools as well.

Most of the catholic and religious schools are not significantly different from public schools they represent a general cross section of the community and are low funded.

The more exclusive schools to me are a different matter and the facts have shown that we pay more to support some schools boat fleet or swimming pools then we do to support near by struggling public schools in total.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14175
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #38 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 6:23pm
 
salad in wrote on Jan 7th, 2011 at 6:59am:
Quote:
1963 Election

In 1963 PM Robert Menzies took the step of providing State Aid (government funding) for independent schools. In Goulburn NSW in 1962 Catholic schools had shut their doors for a week - and dumped their kids on the State school system - to protest against a lack of government funding (State Aid as it was called). While Menzies funded independent schools (and won over many Catholic voters) Labor wrestled with the issue and resisted State Aid. This is the story of that strike and the 1963 election.

http://www.abc.net.au/gnt/history/Transcripts/s1213157.htm


It's simple: the state school system wouldn't be able to cope.




SILLY old arguement, that one

It could be EQUALLY argued that if the Federal Government didn't
bankroll the so-called "private" system
there would be a lot more funding available to a more
egalitarian, universal education model

Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #39 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 7:29pm
 
buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 8th, 2011 at 6:23pm:
It could be EQUALLY argued that if the Federal Government didn't
bankroll the so-called "private" system
there would be a lot more funding available to a more
egalitarian, universal education model
[/size]



SOCIALISM!!!!!!!

No thanks Princess, that's been tried, tested and canned since the 70s
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48864
At my desk.
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #40 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 7:30pm
 
Quote:
It could be EQUALLY argued that if the Federal Government didn't bankroll the so-called "private" system there would be a lot more funding available to a more egalitarian, universal education model


Except that the subsidies to private schools are less than what it costs per student to go through the public system.

I can't get my head around why people opbject to a situation like this where everybody benefits. Is it pure jelousy? Do they simply not understand the implications?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
hawil
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1345
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #41 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 7:34pm
 
Perhaps a solution would be to get rid of public operated schools entirely and have the govt pay the $10,000 per student directly to a private education body to proved no-fee education. It would provide a higher standard of education for no extra cost.

Thoughts?


Very interesting idea; and maybe it would work.
The private schooling is much more utilised in english speaking countries, and the english speaking citizens are also very reluctant to pay taxes, as are the Greeks and look where it got that couintry.
That the private enterprise can built roads and other infrastructure better is, because they can use the whip a lot harder than it is done in government works.In one case the worker is driven to ever increased effort and the safety is at times sacrificed, in government works some workers think they do not have to do anything except pick up their pay every so often.

Read a joke about two workers in the former USSR, says Boris to Ivan, it really puzzles me that we have been stealing from the government for the last 40 years, and there is still something left to be stolen.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
tonegunman1
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 427
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #42 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 7:35pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 8th, 2011 at 7:29pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 8th, 2011 at 6:23pm:
It could be EQUALLY argued that if the Federal Government didn't
bankroll the so-called "private" system
there would be a lot more funding available to a more
egalitarian, universal education model
[/size]



SOCIALISM!!!!!!!

No thanks Princess, that's been tried, tested and canned since the 70s



Is that "let them eat cake"?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #43 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 7:37pm
 
tonegunman1 wrote on Jan 8th, 2011 at 7:35pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 8th, 2011 at 7:29pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 8th, 2011 at 6:23pm:
It could be EQUALLY argued that if the Federal Government didn't
bankroll the so-called "private" system
there would be a lot more funding available to a more
egalitarian, universal education model
[/size]



SOCIALISM!!!!!!!

No thanks Princess, that's been tried, tested and canned since the 70s



Is that "let them eat cake"?



Fraternite and Egalite as they say.
Same old story.

Everyone should pay for someone else.

How about people pay their own way in this world? Novel concept eh?
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48864
At my desk.
Re: Why Should The Public Fund Private Schools.
Reply #44 - Jan 8th, 2011 at 7:49pm
 
Quote:
Perhaps a solution would be to get rid of public operated schools entirely and have the govt pay the $10,000 per student directly to a private education body to proved no-fee education.


I suspect the standards would drop. At the moment only not-for-profit groups run schools - ie governments and churches, and a few other groups. I would hate for us to end up like the US, with coke vending machines in the classrooms as part of a sponsorship deal.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print