bogarde73 wrote on Jan 22
nd, 2011 at 12:40pm:
I find this incredibly ironic in the light of our jumping up & down about Japanese whaling. although as I've said many times, I find the killing of whales appalling.
Between 1820-1840, whaling was Australia's biggest industry, only being eclipsed after that by wool.
100's of whaling ships & boats were built in Hobart & Sydney. Sperm whales were hunted in the pacific and bay whales were hunted around the southern coasts and Tasmanian inlets. In addition provisioning was made available to large numbers of American whalers all the way from New England bases.
Millions of dollars worth of whale oil (used as pre-kerosene fuel for lamps) was shipped to England, not to mention scores of thousands of sealskins. Yep, we were pretty big in the clubbing slaughter of those pesky little critters too.
Puts it into perspective a bit. What goes around comes around (or is my vice versa)
Those are valid points Bogarde...
But they miss a couple of relevant points.....
Commerical whaling is currently under a moratorium (i.e suspended by International Agreement) and all the products that used to be aquired by whaling can now be produced cheaper and 'easier' by synthetic or alternative means..so it's somewhat unnecessary..
And the big points ( from my point of view at least) are why is it necessary to kill the whales 'for scientific research' into reproduction rates??? You can find out the same thing by standing on the shore (or in a boat) and counting them as they swim past every year...
And why is it necessary to sail across 3/4 quarters of the planet to catch them in Antarctica, when they spend half the year in northern waters, near Japan????