nichy wrote on Jan 28
th, 2011 at 2:05pm:
Comments about the rorts already occurring.
Milo of Bulimba Posted at 11:50 PM January 27, 2011
Amazing, after three years of Labor debacles I thought they had already plumbed the debts of incompetance but this is absurd. Consider this: Your home isn't flooded but for safety reasons your power gets cut off for 48 hours. So because your beer goes warm, you have to barbecue thawing food and take cold showers, every member of your family gets $1000, AND now you all escape Jooolya's levy because as AGDRP-recipients you meet the exemption criteria. Hands down, this beats the stupidity of paying thousands of overseas residents who haven't lived in Australia for years, the $900 stimulus payments in their local currency. In 2007 Australia voted for "Change" and we got it. Incompetance and mismanagement is a "change" from Costello's astute financial management, isn't it?
Comment 9 of 317
Gordonh Posted at 11:32 PM January 27, 2011
The Levy is a disgrace. I know a guy who got $4,000 from Centrelink because he lost power for 48 hours, but the flood waters were nowhere near his house. But I couldn't get into work, lost pay and got nothing. But he's exempt while I have to pay the flood levy. All for what? So he gets a nice new home theatre. He was grinning from ear-to-ear. If that money had gone to someone who was genuinely flooded I wouldn't mind, but this rorting is disgraceful. Labor could have stopped it but didn't. Of course we are upset.Comment 4 of 317
Harvey Fewings of Queensland Posted at 6:54 AM Today
Apart from the weirdness of the Whitlam financial circus, has Australia ever had to bear such an incompetent, reactive, unintelligent Government such as this ? Tradespeople have given their time, expertise and, in some cases, actual products to help their fellow Australians effected by the floods. Other people have sat on their bums in a house without power for a couple of days and claim flood disaster relief money. Gillard, in her desperation to buy votes has made money available to almost anyone with a case of prickly heat and now super imposes a flood relief tax on the very people who have given most ! Donations to the Qld Premier's Flood Appeal should be refunded, the thousands of soldiers of the " Mud Army " should be paid for their time, or at least claim their time from the tax levy. Gillard has, once again, working on the socialist principles of envy,divided the Community and succeeded in casting into irrelevance all the good will and free time offered. Come the next disaster, and their will be one, forget the community help efforts,folks, we can all sit on our bums and wait for the ALP to tax us ! Stumblebums hardly describes this Government.
Comment 41 of 317
Not happy Jan of Brisbane Posted at 6:55 AM Today
Nice. So my colleagues who "couldn't get to work" (read - it was inconvenient) and therefore took paid "flood leave" from work have also claimed more than two grand for their family as a non means tested payment and will not be paying the flood levy. Those of us who went to (essential services) work by driving the long way round, worried about our families at home - pay though the nose. Again.Comment 42 of 317
Very annoyed Posted at 7:10 AM Today
I earn $600.00 over $50,000.00 and have four kids living at home. My boss who owns his own business as well as earning an income of over 150K will not have to pay the levy because he and his wife (given 1000k each) lost power for 48 hours. WHAT A JOKE!!!Comment 54 of 317
Allan of Gold Coast Posted at 7:10 AM Today
This will kill the spirit of donating time and money for future natural disasters. Gillard, you have put a knife intot he heart of the goodwill that was shown after these floods by mates helping mates. You were useless during the flood when you were giving speeches read from auto cues and you are useless now. I don't think anyone in the country would mind if you said that to avoid a levy, we would need to put back the surplus target by a year.
Comment 55 of 317
There are some interesting scenarios mentioned in those comments - many of which will be essentially true - and some of which will be misunderstandings or misrepresentations of the facts...
It would seem as though the Govt set loose criteria for claimants - and that some chose to rort same...
Either way, the Centrelink Officers had no real way of verifying claims in the depths of the massive and chaotic crisis - at a time when any reasonable person would have expected that they would err on the side of compassion rather than stinginess...
That said, does anyone know if claimants were required to sign-off on a declaration that their claim was legitimate - and that they undertook to fully repay the monies, via Centrelink's and/or the ATO's usual methods, if their claim was subsequently found to be in any way 'fraudulent'!?