Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
Paradigms (Read 13563 times)
Axle
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 107
Re: Paradigms
Reply #75 - Feb 21st, 2011 at 1:09am
 
Alright, you've shown that there are flavours of agnosticism. How does each flavour undermine the other? That brings me back to what I said way earlier about being Platonic in your thinking. You think that there has to be a one and only flavour.

By your own line of argumentation, I could say that your particular theism is all over the place because there are so many varieties of it. Would you subscribe to that?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Paradigms
Reply #76 - Feb 21st, 2011 at 1:19am
 
Alright, you've shown that there are flavours of agnosticism. How does each flavour undermine the other?

- Axle

Well these so called flavours do actually undermine each other and I would argue .. in a very significant and contradictory manner.

You see I've demonstrated tonight how one is able to wear the Agnostic label and that label may mean that:

1)  I do believe in God yet on the other hand it may well mean I don't believe in God.

2) my belief or non belief in God is completely unknowable yet on the other hand it might be knowable.

Like I said .. it's wishy washy and all over the place.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Axle
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 107
Re: Paradigms
Reply #77 - Feb 21st, 2011 at 1:20am
 
I'd dispute your lumping theism and athiesm with agnosticism. There's the noun and the adjective . You're mixing them up. There's the noun agnosticism which , I suppose, falls under the first two points in your list. Then there's the adjective which describes brands of theists and athiests, not brands of agnostics, which covers your last two points.

As such you'd be forced to argue, in your fashion, that the theist and atheist camps are all over the place.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Paradigms
Reply #78 - Feb 21st, 2011 at 1:25am
 
Huh?? You just acknowledged that there were indeed different flavours within Agnosticism. And Wiki seems to agree with you.

Now you suddenly don't wish to acknowledge this anymore lol??

Tis ok Axle .. I empathise .. completely.

Thanks for a great discussion. Night.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Axle
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 107
Re: Paradigms
Reply #79 - Feb 21st, 2011 at 1:34am
 
Not so fast , Lisa. You've been muddying the water and not proving anything about the agnosticism that I hold. Yes, as I just explained, the two flavours would be strong and weak agnosticism. They're two positions of agnosticism. Those are substantive positions and have nothing to do with agnostic atheists or agnostic theists. There, agnosticism is used to describe some within the athiest and theist camp.

To say an agnostic is a theist is contrary. How can (s)he be if they fall under the strong and weak  agnosticism that you defined. Your argument argument bites theism on its backside. You have acknowledged "agnostic theists" and if we were looking at it like you, you would say that theism is befuddled. However, we do know how "agnostic" is being used there. It isn't a problem.  We won't go to the more fundamental problem about which theist has the right number of gods.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 21st, 2011 at 2:45am by Axle »  
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Paradigms
Reply #80 - Feb 21st, 2011 at 11:06am
 
Axle wrote on Feb 21st, 2011 at 1:34am:
Not so fast , Lisa. You've been muddying the water and not proving anything about the agnosticism that I hold. Yes, as I just explained, the two flavours would be strong and weak agnosticism. They're two positions of agnosticism. Those are substantive positions and have nothing to do with agnostic atheists or agnostic theists. There, agnosticism is used to describe some within the athiest and theist camp.

To say an agnostic is a theist is contrary. How can (s)he be if they fall under the strong and weak  agnosticism that you defined. Your argument argument bites theism on its backside. You have acknowledged "agnostic theists" and if we were looking at it like you, you would say that theism is befuddled. However, we do know how "agnostic" is being used there. It isn't a problem.  We won't go to the more fundamental problem about which theist has the right number of gods.




Ha! You came back lol!

I've now muddied the waters of agnosticism?

Yet all I've done is merely reproduce and present published online information regarding agnosticism .. information that is readily available to any person who googles the word agnosticism.

My definitions??? No .. not mine. Again, the definitions I've posted are available for anyone to see if they google the word agnosticism.

If anything .. you seem to be slowly waking up to the fact that the waters are indeed muddy. Perhaps now you may be able to appreciate why I stated last night that agnosticism was all over the place .. and wishy washy. Muddy? That too.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Paradigms
Reply #81 - Feb 21st, 2011 at 11:14am
 
If you care to read back Axle .. according to the definitions readily available to anyone who googles the term agnosticism .. one is able to see that if you wear the agnostic label then that label may very well mean:

1)  I do believe in God yet on the other hand it may well mean I don't believe in God.

2) my belief or non belief in God is completely unknowable yet on the other hand it might be knowable.

Conclusion? It's all wishy washy, muddy and I would also add .. very confusing.

Little wonder agnostics can't move forward and reach any conclusions. There's so much mud one needs to push through.

Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Superman1
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 197
Re: Paradigms
Reply #82 - Apr 22nd, 2011 at 12:09am
 
Paradigm means model.
Therefore a construct or theory because we don't know.

Science is the first to admit its current models will always be superceded.

As for Spirituality: What science (which means knowing) has there been, as universal as that?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Equitist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9632
NSW
Re: Paradigms
Reply #83 - May 1st, 2011 at 11:53pm
 



Didn't you mean 'antagonism'!?

Lips Sealed
Back to top
 

Lamenting the shift in the Australian psyche, away from the egalitarian ideal of the fair-go - and the rise of short-sighted pollies, who worship the 'Growth Fairy' and seek to divide and conquer!
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48958
At my desk.
Re: Paradigms
Reply #84 - May 2nd, 2011 at 9:06am
 
Paradigms are different framewaorks of knowlege. Our understanding of the world is usually built from the ground up, with basic concepts and more subtle variations on them.

The term paradigm is often used to refer to the intellectual barrier it can create between people whose views are wildly different. It is like you are speaking a different language, because your view of the fundamentals are so different. I see a lot of political discussions around here where people comment on specific technical issues who obviously have a totally different paradigm from the norm, but think it is somehow useful to offer a brief commentary without explaining where they are coming from. Like a communist blaming a CEO for his bankruptcy, leading people to believe he is referring to a direct link, when in fact it is the entire system that he rejects.

In science, there is a paradigm shoft between for example newtonian mechanics and relativity that people are often unaware of. Relativity is not simply a different set of equations, but attaches a different meaning to things like mass, time and distance.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Paradigms
Reply #85 - May 2nd, 2011 at 9:12am
 
freediver wrote on May 2nd, 2011 at 9:06am:
The term paradigm is often used to refer to the intellectual barrier it can create between people whose views are wildly different.


Conversely, a paradigm can artificially construct an intellectual barrier between people whose views in truth are not too different.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Paradigms
Reply #86 - May 24th, 2011 at 4:59pm
 




http://lightworkers.org/channeling/132262/aa-uriels-message-when-are-you-being-may-23-2011


Uriel's Message -- When Are You Being?

The relationship between human and time has always been one you consider as a limitation to your creation. You have to wait for results, to know spirit and heaven, to understand your purpose and life path, to be ready for your connection and so on. Yet the issue of time only exists in your third dimensional reality. All results are measured in the days, weeks, months and years that they take to manifest. Yet this is another third dimensional illusion. When you shift your understanding to higher dimensions you see that time is no more than the motion of energy through the density of illusion.

The more dense the illusion, the harder it is and the longer it takes for energy to move through it. Since you judge your manifestation results by how much time they take to manifest, you believe that time stands between manifestation and creation yet it is not responsible for any delays. Density, which is a mirror of your being, is what creates time or delays in manifestation. And while the greatest amount of density is created by doubt, fear and confusion, it is the 'when' of your being, where you are in your own individual timelines that creates the aspect of time and the level of density associated with it.

When your being is grounded in the past, which is the experiences you have lived, your emotional DNA energies, the vibrations you are at and your energetic frequencies, you are being in a space of great density and illusion which is a mirror of the past. This limits the flow of energy movement and activates the element of time in your manifestations. If you shift your attention to being in the moment you remove the density and time seems to go by quickly which is just another illusion created by the lack of density. From the point of spirit, it is only energy movement that corresponds to your own energetic vibration.

You know 'when' you are placing your being by asking whether you are in the present moment. As you set your intention for each moment, ask 'when' you are being, the point of your timeline where you are energetically. This is the point of your being. You cannot undo, change or re-do the past but you can use that information to create differently in each moment. Stay focused in the present and you will release the density that blocks energy's movement and the illusion of time and waiting, and you will experience instant manifestation as you connect directly and powerfully with the energy that is yours to create with, without density and therefore, without time.

Uriel
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print