mellie wrote on Feb 11
th, 2011 at 3:32pm:
So, the rich get richer, while the middle class get taxed?
And Gillard has the hide to boast a socialist-left background?
ahahahaha
So, Mellie, what are you suggesting!?
Instead of imposing a levy of 0.5% on income between $50,000 and $100,000 and 1% on $100,000 and above - would you support imposing a higher levy, of say 1.5-2%, on those earning above $150,000 or maybe $200,000 or maybe $250,000!?
Isn't it the case, that: the current proposal affects less than 60% of Australians (taxpayers?) because most Aussies have incomes way below $50,000 - I expect that this would come as a surprise to many...if they bothered to consider why so many Aussies have incomes so far below the headline 'Average (Full-Time) Wage'!
BTW, you may recall that Howard/Costello's proposed 2007 tax cuts (which were mostly taken up by the Rudd/Gillard Govt) resulted in 80% of taxpayers with a marginal tax rate of only 30% - this is because
only around 20% of taxpayers have incomes above $80,000)!
That belies Android's claim about being a 'middle income earner' - so much for the lucky and prosperous country, eh!?
That said, this does put the $50,000 and $100,000 levy thresholds back in to perspective - and the ludicrous nature of Howard and Costello's flattening of tax thresholds for the benefit of the elite few at the expense of the vast majority!
Meantime, I don't recall Mellie defining "middle income" for us to date...