Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 14
th, 2011 at 11:01am:
NorthOfNorth wrote on Feb 13
th, 2011 at 10:16pm:
Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 13
th, 2011 at 10:05pm:
NorthOfNorth wrote on Feb 13
th, 2011 at 6:23pm:
I think you're taking Dawkins' little joke more seriously than he did!
but it's true though isn't it
LOL
They're a-polytheists.
All Christians accept the god of all monotheists must be the same... Otherwise you've got two. The argument is not about the existence of the one god, just the nature of the the one god.
and the fact they are quite ready to deny the existence of any other God or Gods
It's all a question of semantics and definitions. The Ancient Romans would have classified angels, demons, saints etc etc as deities (gods). Christians don't. The definition of god depends on the religious tradition. In Christianity, it's all very well to believe that other supernatural beings exist. They just reserve the term God for a kind of three-in-one supreme being which is the only one that they worship.
It's a very long bow to draw in comparing them to Atheists, who don't believe in anything that's called god, but they "could" believe in Angels, Astrology, superstition etc.
After all, TLN, if you can use the dictionary, then so can anybody else. I can't find a definition anywhere that says an Atheist is a person who doesn't believe in gods
or any other supernatural entities. No, you can't back out of that one.
That's why the term 'atheist' is just not very useful.
Quote:All Christians accept the god of all monotheists must be the same
Not according to my dictionary.