Amadd wrote on Mar 6
th, 2011 at 12:24am:
I don't think that you've uncovered any major secret there Mantra.
Did you know that most men desire a nice ass, a pretty face, and a nice set of boobs?
I don't think that I've stumbled across any major secret there either, so you would have to say that the objectives are quite similar.
These instinctual similarities end however, when a man is required to provide shelter and protection given the possibility of a child entering the equation.
For most men, there an instinctual feeling of responsibility when a child might be expected. The others are just assholes in need of extermination.
Yes there are a lot of irresponsible jerks also, but I think it's become all too easy for them to behave this way. They can sow their seed and move on, in many cases with little financial or emotional responsibility expected.
Quote:'Real equality' states that a woman should provide equal shelter and protection for a man. Would any sane woman go for that one? I think not.
There are women who do still provide this, but when they have children their hormones and priorities change and some men just can't deal with this. They want a mother and an ardent lover all rolled up into one. Maybe women either can't cope with this, or just don't want to. The same way men can't cope with the lack of sex and her changing appearance.
Before feminism, generally women stayed at home, nurturing not only the children, but the husband as well. It didn't matter whether she liked it - often she had no choice but to accept it.
Quote:There are different responsibilities concerning the same objective. Each are as important as the other if the desired result is to be achieved.
I think this is where too many couples make mistakes. They should realistically make out a contract before marriage on what they both need and expect. The contract should include regular maintenace of the relationship to ensure the couple continue to work towards the same goal. That's obviously unrealistic - but it should be a condition of the marriage contract.
Quote:IMO, the desired result has been achieved when the children can fend for themselves, or are taken care of.
In the modern world, that means financially, and that's when instinctual law and imagined law cross paths.
Very true, but often by then the rot has set in and it's time to move on. This is the stage where both sexes are moaning about each other.
If we were honest - maybe long term relationships aren't right for many of us, but it's been drummed into us by religion and the media - and looking at our parents' relationship (often long suffering) that this is how it should be.
Quote:Once again, instinctual law will dictate that a man wants to be the major bread winner. There's usually no getting around that feeling nomatter what "equality laws" will dictate.
Nomatter what psychologists (who have always had the largest incidence of suicide) say, you cannot turn a crocodile into a dove overnight.
Give it a few hundred tens of thousands of years of evolution (or de-evolution), and it may happen.
Maybe not. There are native clans where the male does very little, while the woman is the hunter & gatherer & prepares the food and raises the children.
We've been taught that the male should always be the hunter gatherer, yet when there is no male - the woman takes on the role of raising her family - perhaps more easily than the male would under similar circumstances.