Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 22
Send Topic Print
The case against Islamic immigration (Read 41949 times)
It_is_the_Darkness
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4000
in a ReTardis
Gender: male
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #135 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 8:43pm
 
Yes, if it wasn't for Moslems learning maths from the Blacks, Europe (that includes Westie Europe) would still be counting the days during the dark ages.
Grin
Back to top
 

SUCKING ON MY TITTIES, LIKE I KNOW YOU WANT TO.
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #136 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 9:42pm
 
Grey wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 7:01pm:
Christianity - The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father, can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your Lord and master, so he can remove a black bit from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat an apple from a magic tree.

I have to admit that on balance it's not the most convincing argument I ever heard.

Islam



Sneering and jeering is for morons.  You could not have your faith in reason without Christianity. You couldn't have your history, literature, philosophy, all your mental furniture without it. You wouln't be you without Christianity. 
Don't believe in it. But when you sneer at it, when you jeer at it, you are the manic idiot sticking out his tongue at the mirror.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #137 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 9:43pm
 
It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 5:20pm:
That has got to be one of the most funniest send-ups I have ever seen.
Good stuff Grey.
Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

bugger, you are simple.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #138 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 3:02am
 
Soren wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 9:42pm:
Sneering and jeering is for morons.  You could not have your faith in reason without Christianity. You couldn't have your history, literature, philosophy, all your mental furniture without it. You wouln't be you without Christianity.  
Don't believe in it. But when you sneer at it, when you jeer at it, you are the manic idiot sticking out his tongue at the mirror.


Oh dear, you do have it bad don't you? I assure you Reason, History, Literature and joined up thinking all existed and would've continued to develop without religious interference. For instance neither spelt a miraculous natural hybrid discovered and cultivated near Jericho nor the subsequent further hybridization which occurred in Turkey 10,000 years ago to produce the wheat civilization is fed on needed the church. Neither did the wheel's, (and axles) inventor 3,500 years BCE, who managed to nut out the problems all on his/her own. Where does literature start ? The 'Epic of Gilgamesh' (2000 BCE) Or perhaps to the more poetic 16,000 years before that at Lascaux.



Ascribing human enlightenment to religion is just daft. The cart is pulling a dead horse up the mountain.
Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #139 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 8:58am
 
I have badly misjudged Jasignature. I took him for a person of goodwill but I find he is just a waste of space.
Grey is a more serious problem. He seems to have education but a warped outlook and the inability or the refusal to see that what we are talking about is not religion as such, but a culture clash and a struggle for survival.
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #140 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 9:39am
 
In 2009 I spent a month in Europe -- Britain, Germany, France and Belgium -- working on Muslim immigration issues.

I interviewed government ministers, immigration officials, non-government organisation advocates, immigrants themselves and almost anyone who would talk to me. What became clear was that uncontrolled Muslim immigration from North Africa (and from Pakistan in Britain's case) had presented itself as an asylum issue, and thereby disabled Europe's political response, and had been a disaster on the ground.

Christopher Caldwell's book, Reflections on the Revolution in Europe, the best book of any kind on public policy I have read, establishes definitively that this has been overwhelmingly a determined illegal immigration, not a refugee question.

The same is happening in northern Australia now, and as the Gillard government loses control of the situation, the number of illegal immigrants, almost all Muslim, will increase, exactly replicating the dynamics of Europe's disaster, though of course on a much smaller scale.

So while I remain an advocate of a bigger immigration program, and would be happy to have the refugee quota enlarged, I am now a strong critic of lax borders and allowing illegal immigrants to turn up without papers and then settle permanently.

Caldwell's book, along with the evidence of my own eyes, also convinced me that many North Africans were not going to Europe to embrace European values but to continue their North African life, with its values, at a European living standard and at the expense of the European taxpayer.

Living next to Lakemba for nearly 15 years also gave me a different view of how immigration can go wrong. Our sons went initially to a state primary school that had a brilliant principal and did a fine job.

But as they approached secondary school a senior teacher told us that our boys had academic potential and it would be a tragedy to send them to the local high school. It was riven with violence and misogyny, drugs and gang and ethnic conflict.

If you find yourself unexpectedly in a war zone, your instinct is to evacuate the family, so the boys went to a private Catholic school, which was racially and even religiously diverse, though I don't believe there were any Muslim kids there. It was excellent.

Lakemba and surrounding areas such as Punchbowl had a large Lebanese Muslim population, many of whom had come when Malcolm Fraser crazily instituted a come-one, come-all admissions policy for those claiming to be refugees from the Lebanon conflicts of the 80s.

Replicating the European experience that the second generation had more trouble than the first, it was the sons of some of these immigrants who figured heavily in anti-social activities.

I was shocked to discover the growth of jihadi culture in Lakemba. We used to go to its main street for shopping and for food.

One day, waiting for a pizza order, I wandered into the Muslim bookshop. I was astounded to see titles such as The International Jew or The Truth about the Pope, amid a welter of anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and pro-extremist literature.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/how-i-lost-faith-in-multiculturalism/story-fn59niix-1226031793805
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21676
A cat with a view
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #141 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 12:57pm
 
Grey wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 5:13pm:
Quote:
"Allah's Apostle was asked, "What is the best deed?" He replied, "To believe in Allah and His Apostle (Muhammad). The questioner then asked, "What is the next (in goodness)? He replied, "To participate in Jihad (religious fighting) in Allah's Cause." "
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith...


Yadda Jihad doesn't mean 'religious fighting' it means the moral struggle.

I wonder what would happen if a person ripped and burnt a bible during a hillside meeting? I'm curious but not keen to try it personally.








Grey,

It doesn't matter how many times that you may call the truth a lie, or, a falsehood, what is true, is true.

The fact that you deny truth, the fact that you are averse to truth, when it doesn't align with your preconceived worldview, doesn't change the fact that all good moslems are duplicitous, in how the define Arabic words in English.

And almost all good moslems are duplicitous, and false, in how they represent ISLAM, when speaking to non-moslem audiences.







EXAMPLES;


DECEIT EXAMPLE #1,
GOOD MOSLEM SPEAKS TO NON-MOSLEM AUDIENCE - blatant deceit

A UK moslem *community leader*, speaking in the wake of the London 7/7 bombing;
"We condemn the killing of all innocent civilians."

#1,
SAME GOOD MOSLEM SPEAKS TO A *MOSLEM* AUDIENCE

"...Later when he addressed his own followers he explained that he had in fact been referring only to Muslims as only they were innocent: "Yes I condemn killing any innocent people, but not any kuffar." "
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article552594.ece




DECEIT EXAMPLE #2,
GOOD MOSLEM SPEAKS TO NON-MOSLEM AUDIENCE - blatant deceit

"The Undercover Mosque: The return"
"A group of Christians visiting the mosque and the preacher and the Women's Circle treat [the Christians] kindly and talk about,
'We're all people of the book and we all come from the same history'."

#2,
SAME GOOD MOSLEM THEN, SPEAKS TO A *MOSLEM* AUDIENCE

"Just as soon as that group of visitors [the Christians] leaves, the language changes completely. 'CHRISTIANITY IS VILE', the preacher says....."

Source;
ABC Radio National Religion interview transcript  - "The Undercover Mosque: The return"
".....Stephen Crittenden: .....your program highlights a certain kind of duplicity. When they're caught out, individuals don't miss a [beat], they just say they've been taken out of context....
David Henshaw: ......Regent's Park Mosque is officially committed to inter-faith dialogue....."

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/religionreport/stories/2008/2360820.htm#transcript



+++

Anther example of moslem duality, and duplicity, when 'communicating' with non-moslems about ISLAM....


All non-moslems should be told, and should come to understand and know, that moslems and non-moslems define certain common English words very, very differently.


To a moslem words like these, mean...

Peace = = Submission to Allah is the only peace recognized in Islam.

Righteousness = = Is following the Way of Allah. A moslem can be a killer and murder of non-moslems and yet be regarded by all good moslems as a righteous person.

Good works = = To be good for a moslem is to submit to Allah's will and then follow the 'right' path established by the examples set by the Prophet. [Murdering critics and murdering other assorted 'enemies', pirating against peaceful non-moslem communities, paedophilia, raping women captives which were secured in raiding parties, etc. ALL THESE ACTIONS BY MOHAMMED ARE CATALOGUED AND RECORDED IN THE HADITH.]


Source for how moslems define the meaning of words differently,

Google,
Islam 101: A Lexicon for Dummies


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48857
At my desk.
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #142 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 1:33pm
 
Quote:
There are 1.57 Billion Muslims in the world and 2.1 billion Christians, if they all want to be jihadists and crusaders it should be epic. But apart from a handful of plane hijackers and another handful of bombers the last decade has seen a lot more Muslims fighting Muslims and Christians fighting Christians. Which is a bit strange if all muslims are so alike you'd think they were all clones.


None of my suggestions even hint at them being clones. How is this even relevant? Would you argue we let convicted rapists or thieves in because until now they have targetted people in their own country rather than Australians?

Quote:
I'm perfectly serious. The world has seen too many of these pogroms.


Did you read what I suggested? How is choosing who can enter this country anything like a pogrom?

Quote:
In what context? If an Atheist, a Christian, a Jew and a Muslim are moving fridges they pretty much all agree a trolley is a good idea. If the question is one of religious belief then they all answer as you would expect but differently. The vast majority don't want a fight about religion if they like you.


My suggestions have nothing to do with trolleys or relgion. They are about democracy and freedom. And unlike you, I have asked Muslims about it. I suggest you do the same. Or are you suggesting that the ability to move a fridge is the only criteria we should apply to potential immigrants?

Quote:
Being nice to people is the best method of defence.


Have you ever had to actually defend yourself? This sort of naive BS only works while you are paying someone else to carry your stick.

Quote:
I'm with Grey on this one.
Most Australian Moslems are Moderate.


Then I ask you the same question Jas - what do you actually mean by moderate? Do you even know what you mean? Does being 'just a sparky' make someone moderate?

Quote:
I also see a lot of people using the excuse of Individualism to bully & degrade the Moslem (Middle-East) act of 'mass-production-breeding' character. How can a Nation like the USA, with the world's highest Divorce Rate and denegration of women - condemn Moslems for how they treat their women.


Have you ever asked a woman whether they would prefer to live under American law and social standards or Islamic ones? Or would that involve mentioning too many of those inconvenient details you try so hard to avoid? You seem to be projecting a lot onto both Muslims and women without even stopping to ask them what they think.

Quote:
Maybe they are jealous that Moslem women get to have more Children than them without the need for an X-Box or TV??


Again Jas, have you ever asked a woman what they want?

Quote:
Me thinks there are Moslems 'playing up' to the American Media.


Again Jas, have you ever asked them why they do what they do?

Quote:
Only a True Moslem would hold only a Book, specifically the Book of Mohommedism


So Jas, you even define Islam for them? Aren't you taking the whole arrogance thing a bit too far?

Quote:
Me thinks a lot of Australian Moslems are sick of these Moslems giving their Religion a bad/false name.


Why don't you ask them what they think Jas?

Quote:
I'm just saying that Australia presents an opportunity for 'individual' Moslems to stand up for the 'individuality' of their Religion.


Would you support immigration policy that bars entry to those who have no interest in doing so?

Quote:
I wonder what would happen if a person ripped and burnt a bible during a hillside meeting? I'm curious but not keen to try it personally.


I think they would get laughed at. If you had a choice between doing that in the heartland of happy clappers or the heartland of Islam, which would you choose?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21676
A cat with a view
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #143 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 1:34pm
 
bogarde73 wrote on Apr 2nd, 2011 at 8:58am:
I have badly misjudged Jasignature. I took him for a person of goodwill but I find he is just a waste of space.
Grey is a more serious problem. He seems to have education but a warped outlook and the inability or the refusal to see that what we are talking about is not religion as such, but a culture clash and a struggle for survival.





bogarde73,

I am certain that many some 'calming voices' in political forums like this one, are in fact undeclared moslem posters, who portray themselves, as non-moslems.

Undeclared, so to give their 'calming' voice, their opinion, an unbiased 'air'.



e.g.
Witness the poster in this thread who is adamant, about the 'neutral' meaning, of the Arabic word, 'Jihad',
....despite the fact that ISLAMIC religious texts [the Hadith], clearly define the word 'Jihad', as, religious fighting.

n.b.
This document source [though located on a US university website] is maintained/'authorised' as authentic, by an ISLAMIC group...

"Allah's Apostle was asked, "What is the best deed?" He replied, "To believe in Allah and His Apostle (Muhammad). The questioner then asked, "What is the next (in goodness)? He replied, "To participate in Jihad (religious fighting) in Allah's Cause." "
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith...

Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 2nd, 2011 at 2:00pm by Yadda »  

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #144 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 1:49pm
 
Quote:
Yadda - And almost all good moslems are duplicitous, and false, in how they represent ISLAM, when speaking to non-moslem audiences.


Yadda, look deep into my eyes  Smiley , I don't have a fixed world view. I was for most of my life an Anarchist. The only reason I don't use that as a self description now is the realisation that the only Anarchist gang worth anything is called 'general public'. I'm also an atheist, my view is unimpeded by dogma.

My only interest is in finding true things. Usually that means finding the point of paradox where the conflicting views collide. I don't wish to defend Islam actually. I find all religions pretty well equal in their respective nuttyness. But when one side is dominating the argument I'll take the other to make the balance.

Of course a Muslims point of view will always be biased. So will the view of any gang member be biased. I'm familiar with  'undercover mosque', it was a work of journalism that needed doing and it was well done. I don't want Mullah's like that in Australia and they are here. But it is equally false to assert that they represent the views of all Muslims.  Some of the preaching that comes off Christian pulpits and some of what is said in synagogues is as divisive and hate driven. All churches need to be held to account.
Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21676
A cat with a view
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #145 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 2:11pm
 
Grey wrote on Apr 2nd, 2011 at 1:49pm:
Quote:
Yadda - And almost all good moslems are duplicitous, and false, in how they represent ISLAM, when speaking to non-moslem audiences.


Yadda, look deep into my eyes  Smiley , I don't have a fixed world view. I was for most of my life an Anarchist. The only reason I don't use that as a self description now is the realisation that the only Anarchist gang worth anything is called 'general public'. I'm also an atheist, my view is unimpeded by dogma.

My only interest is in finding true things. Usually that means finding the point of paradox where the conflicting views collide. I don't wish to defend Islam actually. I find all religions pretty well equal in their respective nuttyness. But when one side is dominating the argument I'll take the other to make the balance.

Of course a Muslims point of view will always be biased. So will the view of any gang member be biased. I'm familiar with  'undercover mosque', it was a work of journalism that needed doing and it was well done. I don't want Mullah's like that in Australia and they are here. But it is equally false to assert that they represent the views of all Muslims.  Some of the preaching that comes off Christian pulpits and some of what is said in synagogues is as divisive and hate driven. All churches need to be held to account.



Grey,

Thank you for your post, making your position clear.



Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48857
At my desk.
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #146 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 2:33pm
 
Quote:
I don't want Mullah's like that in Australia and they are here.


So you support immigration restrictions?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21676
A cat with a view
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #147 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 2:56pm
 
Grey wrote on Apr 2nd, 2011 at 1:49pm:

Of course a Muslims point of view will always be biased. So will the view of any gang member be biased. I'm familiar with  'undercover mosque', it was a work of journalism that needed doing and it was well done. I don't want Mullah's like that in Australia and they are here. But it is equally false to assert that they represent the views of all Muslims.  Some of the preaching that comes off Christian pulpits and some of what is said in synagogues is as divisive and hate driven. All churches need to be held to account.




You are starting from a false premise;

The premise that it is possible for moslems to define themselves [i.e. who is a moslem].

Wrong.

ISLAM alone, defines who is a moslem.




It is ISLAM itself, which defines who is a moslem.

Not you, and not those who may claim that they can define themselves as 'moslem', or may choose to refer to themselves as 'moslems'.

To be moslem, a person must accept the doctrines of ISLAM.

Doctrines which insist that it is 'legal' of moslems, to murder anyone who will not submit to ISLAM's authority over their lives, and to murder anyone who renounces his faith [in ISLAM].

Doctrines which promote deception as an act of Jihad, against those non-moslems who are [atm] too strong to subjugate.

THOSE ARE PROVABLE FACTS.

AND, within that definition of, 'anyone' [who can 'lawfully' be killed by moslems], is also included ppl, who may refer to themselves as moslems, but who live an un-ISLAMIC lifestyle.


+++

ISLAMIC law texts declare whom moslems can 'lawfully' kill,
i.e. 'unbelievers'.

"Ibn 'Abbas reported that the Prophet said: "The bare essence of Islam and the basics of the religion are three [acts], upon which Islam has been established. Whoever leaves one of them becomes an unbeliever and his blood may legally be spilled. [The acts are:] Testifying that there is no God except Allah, the obligatory prayers, and the fast of Ramadan."...."
law/fiqhussunnah/fus3_50
www site...
http://www.islamonline.net/English/Ramadan/1424/10/fiqhi_issues/Rulings_of_Fasti...

n.b. "Whoever......becomes an unbeliever.....his blood may legally be spilled."


The Koran.....

"Believers, obey Allah, and obey the Messenger! Those who disbelieve and hinder men from the Cause of Allah, He will not pardon. Do not falter; become faint-hearted, or weak-kneed, crying for peace. You have the upper hand.
Koran 47.33-35

i.e. 'Those who disbelieve' and resist the authority of ISLAM over their lives, they are the enemies of Allah, kill them.
When you have the upper hand, slay them.



The Hadith,
"...If somebody (a moslem) discards his religion, kill him."
bukhari/ #004.052.260



Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #148 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 3:09pm
 
Quote:
Bogarde - I have badly misjudged Jasignature. I took him for a person of goodwill but I find he is just a waste of space.
Grey is a more serious problem. He seems to have education but a warped outlook and the inability or the refusal to see that what we are talking about is not religion as such, but a culture clash and a struggle for survival.


What's this? An attempt to divide and rule Bogey?  Grin

I'm inclined to agree with most of Greg Sheridans piece.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/how-i-lost-faith-in-multicultur...

What he doesn't address is the cause of modern Islamic militancy. In large measure it's our own devil biting us (the western hegemony) on the arse. Not surprising for somebody who, as he said, has been an unwavering supporter of Israel.

Let me for the record say these things. And if I contradict myself, as Walt Whitman said. "Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am legion, there are many of us living here."

I have never  supported multiculturalism. From the first time I heard the word I hated it. I love and desire cosmopolitan society, that happy period when cultures merge and share, reject what is not useful and adopt that which is good. It's a dynamic process that is beyond the scope of government interference.

I don't think France ever adopted MC in the first place. France has always taken the same line. The French are completely colourblind, anybody from anywhere is French - just as long as they act French in everyway. I love the french for their antiracism, I loathe their authoritarianism, (I once saw a gendarme whack a kid across the face with a truncheon for leaning on a parked car). France has been a favoured refuge for black americans like Billie Holliday, Paul Robson and Nina Simone, but it can never be cosmopolitan like London, or Istanbul. 

I supported a war to oust the Taliban even before 9/11. If there's one thing worse than fascism it's theofascism, nobody anywhere should have to live like that; not in Afghanistan, nor Yemen, Saudi Arabia or anywhere else. That includes Iran, but Iran is different. I don't believe
that the hard line clerics of Iran are as entrenched. I think the Persians are a sophisticated people who will soon sort themselves out.

I don't think that there's any reason to not accept 'economic refugees'. Things have to be extreme before people will leave their homelands for whatever reason. If it was a simple matter of 'being better off' Scotland and the North of England would have emptied into London decades ago and London would've emptied into Australia in the sixties. The vast majority of people will not leave no matter how bad things get.

If Al Quaeda terrorists wanted to enter Australia they'd be more likely to hold Israeli diplomatic passports and fly in Quantas business class, than attempt to cross the sea in a leaky boat.

Australia isn't served by damaging people psychologically before letting them out into the community. Nobody in their right mind would riot while waiting to get residency approval without feeling that this was the only way to be noticed enough to get anything happening at all before dieing of old age.

People should be dealt with always as themselves. Not as Jews or Muslims or black or white. The worst thing that is being said here is that Muslims are all the same. Nearly 2 billion people 'all the same', it's bullshit. There's a huge difference between Europe and Australia, Australia needs more people, give the kids training and a well paying job - end of problem. If you find some mad mullahs give 'em a lift to yemen. Drop 'em off halfway and let them swim the rest, no worries from me. 

Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Re: The case against Islamic immigration
Reply #149 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 3:23pm
 
There you go again Grey. You're inclined to agree with most of the article you say but the rest of your piece is a carefully constructed naysay to any kind of Europe-style problem arising here, despite what Sheridan has documented as the problems of Lakemba etc already.

We are not talking about tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. We are talking about 20, 30 years time when it will impinge on our grandchildren if we sdon't stop it infecting us now.
And it is an infection which no herbal remedies will cure once it has taken hold.

You are typical head-in-the-sand appeasement and it will all go away.
Well it won't.
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 22
Send Topic Print