Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 9
Send Topic Print
Burqua ban start on Monday (Read 18460 times)
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Burqua ban start on Monday
Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:40pm
 
http://au.news.yahoo.com/queensland/a/-/world/9166141/french-burqa-ban-goes-into-force-on-monday/

French police will from Monday become the first officers in Europe empowered to intercept Muslim women wearing full-face veils and to threaten them with fines if they refuse to expose their faces.

While some other countries and territories have drawn up bans on the burqa and the niqab, France -- home to Europe's largest Muslim population -- will be the first to risk stirring social tensions by putting one into practice.

The law comes into effect at an already fraught moment in relations between the state and France's Muslim minority, with President Nicolas Sarkozy accused of stigmatising Islam to win back votes from a resurgent far right.

French officials estimate that only around 2,000 women, from a total Muslim population estimated at between four and six million, wear a niqab or a burqa, full-face veils that are traditional in parts of Arabia and South Asia.

But many Muslims and rights watchdogs accuse Sarkozy of targeting one of France's most vulnerable and isolated groups to signal to anti-immigration voters that he shares their fear that Islam is a threat to French culture.

Other critics worry the law may be hard to enforce, since it had to be drawn up without reference to religion to ban any kind of face covering in public and since police officers will not be allowed to remove women's head coverings.

Many supporters of the law have defended it as a measure not designed to harm Islam, but to support a woman's right to walk unveiled, although the text makes it clear that a woman can not choose herself to cover her face in public.

Under a ministerial directive, anyone refusing to lift his or her veil to submit to an identity check can be taken to a police station. There, officers must try to persuade them to remove the garment, and can threaten fines.

A woman who repeatedly insists on appearing veiled in public can be fined 150 euros ($A205) and ordered to attend re-education classes.

There are much more severe penalties for anyone found guilty of forcing someone else to hide his or her face "through threats, violence, constraint, abuse of authority or power for reason of their gender".

Clearly aimed at fathers, husbands or religious leaders who force women to wear face-veils, and applicable to offences committed in public or in private, the law imposes a fine of 30,000 euros and a year in jail.

Moves to impose the law began in June when an opposition Communist lawmaker demanded a parliamentary inquiry into whether the wearing of full-face veils was becoming more prevalent in French Muslim communities.

Sarkozy waited only a couple of days before weighing in, declaring the full-face veil was "not welcome" in France and branding it a symbol of "servitude" and not of religious observance.

France's main Muslim representative body, the CFCM, partially agreed with him, issuing a statement arguing that insisting upon a niqab or a burqa was an "extremist" reading of the Koran and not a "religious obligation".

But other groups claimed the government had seized on an issue that touches a tiny minority and used it to stigmatise the entire Muslim community, which has been accused of failing to integrate into French life.

Foreign extremists, including fugitive al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden used the ban to argue France is at war with Islam, and called for attacks.

It is hard to gauge the mood of the bulk of veil wearing French Muslim women, but two -- who gave their names as Aya and Umm Isra -- said they would not challenge the ban in the street.

But, they added, if they can't wear their niqabs they will likely go out far less often, suggesting the ban could create a hidden underclass.

Sarkozy and his party have refused to back down and, seeing their opinion poll scores dipping and those of the anti-Islam National Front growing, have vowed to start a broader debate on the place of Islam in France.

The centre-right president will seek re-election next year and a strong showing for the Front's leader Marine Le Pen in the first round could fatally wound his campaign and allow the left's candidate to sweep past to victory.
Belgium's parliament has approved a similar law, but has yet to enforce it. In the Netherlands far-right leaders have proposed a ban, and in Italy the right-wing Northern League is lobbying for a ban on the French model.
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48875
At my desk.
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #1 - Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:43pm
 
Bad idea. The French have turned liberty on its head.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #2 - Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:55pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:43pm:
Bad idea. The French have turned liberty on its head.




oh crap so if you had a small shop and they all came in with faces covered you wouldnt mind...yeah right.

if its good enough for a motorbike riders.. or even a skier..then its good enough for them. its got nothing to do with freedom or liberty.its commonsense
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5397
Gender: male
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #3 - Apr 9th, 2011 at 2:38pm
 
In western society only criminals hide their face in public. Vive la France!
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
It_is_the_Darkness
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4000
in a ReTardis
Gender: male
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #4 - Apr 9th, 2011 at 3:53pm
 
...and the Moslems will do to the French
what the Germans did to the Jews
and then both Moslem and Jew will Unite
and get those bloody Italians (who just happen to take a dive out of helping the French against the Moslem onslaught.)

Back to top
 

SUCKING ON MY TITTIES, LIKE I KNOW YOU WANT TO.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48875
At my desk.
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #5 - Apr 9th, 2011 at 4:50pm
 
cods wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:55pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:43pm:
Bad idea. The French have turned liberty on its head.




oh crap so if you had a small shop and they all came in with faces covered you wouldnt mind...yeah right.

if its good enough for a motorbike riders.. or even a skier..then its good enough for them. its got nothing to do with freedom or liberty.its commonsense


I think they have banned them in public. Not bike helmets. Not ski masks. Not KKK uniforms. Only burqas.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jaykaye_09
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 583
Gender: male
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #6 - Apr 9th, 2011 at 4:56pm
 
cods wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:55pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:43pm:
Bad idea. The French have turned liberty on its head.


oh crap so if you had a small shop and they all came in with faces covered you wouldnt mind...yeah right.

if its good enough for a motorbike riders.. or even a skier..then its good enough for them. its got nothing to do with freedom or liberty.its commonsense


Yeah, those burqa clad thieves are growing in numbers.

Besides, why not make a standard policy that encompasses all face coverings, including but not limited to burqas? Alternatively, why not give shop owners, business etc. the right to decide these measures within their own stores, rather than a standard application across all public areas?
Back to top
 

If I don't respond to a post directed toward me, it's probably because I've gone offline, not because I'm rude.&&&&Or maybe I don't like you. In which case, sod off. Ta.
 
IP Logged
 
darkhall67
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1935
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #7 - Apr 9th, 2011 at 8:53pm
 
Jaykaye_09 wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 4:56pm:
cods wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:55pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:43pm:
Bad idea. The French have turned liberty on its head.


oh crap so if you had a small shop and they all came in with faces covered you wouldnt mind...yeah right.

if its good enough for a motorbike riders.. or even a skier..then its good enough for them. its got nothing to do with freedom or liberty.its commonsense


Yeah, those burqa clad thieves are growing in numbers.

Besides, why not make a standard policy that encompasses all face coverings, including but not limited to burqas? Alternatively, why not give shop owners, business etc. the right to decide these measures within their own stores, rather than a standard application across all public areas?




You know jaye that you and I share many values and opinions across a broad array of topics

BUT


I find myself in agreement with the French ban

and here's why;


If an african man walked down the street with a ball and chain around his leg and claimed

"I choose to wear this ball and chain. My master wants me to wear it and I am in total agreement with him. You are taking away MY rights to wear this ball and chain by banning it.

I WANT to wear this ball and chain.

I CHOOSE to wear this ball and chain.

I feel safest when i wear this ball and chain.

Who are YOU to deny me my right to wear this ball and chain?


it's MY choice to wear this ball and chain.  "


How should we react to this "opinion".  This "right"?





I'm looking forward to your reply because if  anyone could come up with one that  could possible convince me it's you.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 10th, 2011 at 2:57am by darkhall67 »  
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #8 - Apr 9th, 2011 at 11:37pm
 
"You take away my ball and chain, you take away my freedom! For I am black and proud!"

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #9 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 12:03am
 
LOOK SOREN - THE TOWER OF FREE POWER



...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jaykaye_09
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 583
Gender: male
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #10 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 3:06am
 
darkhall67 wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 8:53pm:
Jaykaye_09 wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 4:56pm:
cods wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:55pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:43pm:
Bad idea. The French have turned liberty on its head.


oh crap so if you had a small shop and they all came in with faces covered you wouldnt mind...yeah right.

if its good enough for a motorbike riders.. or even a skier..then its good enough for them. its got nothing to do with freedom or liberty.its commonsense


Yeah, those burqa clad thieves are growing in numbers.

Besides, why not make a standard policy that encompasses all face coverings, including but not limited to burqas? Alternatively, why not give shop owners, business etc. the right to decide these measures within their own stores, rather than a standard application across all public areas?


You know jaye that you and I share many values and opinions across a broad array of topics

BUT

I find myself in agreement with the French ban

...

I'm looking forward to your reply because if  anyone could come up with one that I could possible convince me it's you.


Pressure is on now... And I'm not sure this will address your point too much, however:

First of all, I want to make clear that I don't like the burqa. Obviously, I don't like that people are forced to wear it, nor do I like the fact that people - even by choice - feel the need to wear it.

But there are issues specific to the burqa, or a burqa ban, that I have trouble with. I've alluded to the idea that the ban on the burqa is an overreaction to what has thus far been a relative non-issue, and I think much in the way of concerns surrounding security (and indeed a general social 'openness') could be better addressed with other measures.

This isn't really about security though, and those responsible for the ban have admittedly said as much. Again, for what it's worth, I acknowledge their concerns and for the most part, agree with them (even if I do, as stated, think it's a bit of an overreaction).

However, I still think such a ban is unproductive and potentially dangerous.

We know people are forced to wear the burqa. Is such a ban really going to change anything? Any woman who lives in a family (or culture) that forces her to wear the covering is likely already subject to a fair degree of pressure (at best) or fear and intimidation (at worst). Do we really think the people responsible for forcing someone to wear the covering are going to happily abide by the new laws? Of course not. My concern is that for the most part this will ultimately force such behaviour to manifest itself in more sinister, hidden ways.

Then there are those who choose to wear the burqa. They do so because they feel it provides them a degree of modesty as outlined in the Quran (an extreme interpretation, but one held by some nonetheless). A ban on the burqa is essentially dictating to these individuals the way in which they should practice their religion. Now this has merit to some degree (e.g. we can't allow people to practice their faith in a way that represents a danger to others), but it's an extremely dangerous, slippery slope - especially when the reasons for doing so seem so vague (if that's the right word. Regardless, there's not to much in the way of how this ban is expected to 'work').

Ultimately, I think there are better ways to approach the subject, both in terms of cultural and security concerns.

In terms of the 'ball and chain', I wouldn't actually support a 'ban' in such a hypothetical. The above reasons generally apply, and I certainly don't feel that it would address that actual problem that makes the individual wear that ball and chain.

It's kind of late, so my answer might not make to much sense, but I'll have another look at it come morning  Wink Hope it clarifies where I stand anyway.  
Back to top
 

If I don't respond to a post directed toward me, it's probably because I've gone offline, not because I'm rude.&&&&Or maybe I don't like you. In which case, sod off. Ta.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48875
At my desk.
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #11 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 8:55am
 
darkhall67 wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 8:53pm:
Jaykaye_09 wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 4:56pm:
cods wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:55pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2011 at 1:43pm:
Bad idea. The French have turned liberty on its head.


oh crap so if you had a small shop and they all came in with faces covered you wouldnt mind...yeah right.

if its good enough for a motorbike riders.. or even a skier..then its good enough for them. its got nothing to do with freedom or liberty.its commonsense


Yeah, those burqa clad thieves are growing in numbers.

Besides, why not make a standard policy that encompasses all face coverings, including but not limited to burqas? Alternatively, why not give shop owners, business etc. the right to decide these measures within their own stores, rather than a standard application across all public areas?




You know jaye that you and I share many values and opinions across a broad array of topics

BUT


I find myself in agreement with the French ban

and here's why;


If an african man walked down the street with a ball and chain around his leg and claimed

"I choose to wear this ball and chain. My master wants me to wear it and I am in total agreement with him. You are taking away MY rights to wear this ball and chain by banning it.

I WANT to wear this ball and chain.

I CHOOSE to wear this ball and chain.

I feel safest when i wear this ball and chain.

Who are YOU to deny me my right to wear this ball and chain?


it's MY choice to wear this ball and chain.  "


How should we react to this "opinion".  This "right"?





I'm looking forward to your reply because if  anyone could come up with one that  could possible convince me it's you.




So long as it is his genuine choice and he is not holding up traffic, it is his right. You make it a bit ambiguous by throwing in the term master. Our society gives him the right to walk away, gives people the right to encourage him to walk away, imposes myriad legal requirements on whoever his master might be, but it does not compell him to do anything.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
mavisdavis
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1512
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #12 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:29am
 
Every country has the natural right to uphold their own standards, within reason.  To go in public with one`s identity hidden is offensive to many westerners.  France gas every right to maintain it`s own standards, if it offends a few creepy hair splitters, so be it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #13 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:33am
 
mavisdavis wrote on Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:29am:
Every country has the natural right to uphold their own standards, within reason.  To go in public with one`s identity hidden is offensive to many westerners.  France gas every right to maintain it`s own standards, if it offends a few creepy hair splitters, so be it.


But Sarkozy is Jewish
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48875
At my desk.
Re: Burqua ban start on Monday
Reply #14 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:40am
 
Quote:
Every country has the natural right to uphold their own standards, within reason.  To go in public with one`s identity hidden is offensive to many westerners.  France gas every right to maintain it`s own standards, if it offends a few creepy hair splitters, so be it.


So countries have natural rights, but people don't? It is only hair splitting because they are denying someone else the right to choose what to wear. If the government started telling you you cannot go in public without exposing your breasts I doubt you would consider it hair splitting.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 9
Send Topic Print