freediver wrote on Apr 18
th, 2011 at 7:33pm:
It is not the public flag of Islamofascism. It is merely one of hundreds of symbols you could declare to be the flag next time you want to ban something.
You talk like I try to ban something different every day; nothing could be further from the truth.
Quote: Even if it were a flag, (
) what benefit would there be in banning it? Can you give a single histoprical example where something positive has been achieved by banning a flag or symbol?
Well there's the words b**ng and n***er etc. Some would say that's sweeping them undre the carpet, others would say that's the best place for them.
Quote:Perhaps you think islamofascism is going to disappear overnight because you have banned the burqa?
No but I'd call it a step in the right direction.
Quote:The difficulties are in frameworking legislation that isn't ridiculous.
Quote:Any legislation that targets a symbol rather than the reality and which punishes the victim rather than the perpetrator is going to be rediculous. The problem is not in the frameworking, but in what you want to achieve. There is no sensible way to frame it because it is stupid.
Symbols are real otherwise they wouldn't be used. Every word we write is a symbol for a feeling that we translate into a thought and project as a vibration in the air. A swastika 'says' something. I don't see Islamist women who wear the burqa in Australia as victims. I see them as Islamofascism's useful idiots.