Jaykaye_09 wrote on Apr 9
th, 2011 at 4:56pm:
cods wrote on Apr 9
th, 2011 at 1:55pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 9
th, 2011 at 1:43pm:
Bad idea. The French have turned liberty on its head.
oh crap so if you had a small shop and they all came in with faces covered you wouldnt mind...yeah right.
if its good enough for a motorbike riders.. or even a skier..then its good enough for them. its got nothing to do with freedom or liberty.its commonsense
Yeah, those burqa clad thieves are growing in numbers.
Besides, why not make a standard policy that encompasses all face coverings, including but not limited to burqas? Alternatively, why not give shop owners, business etc. the right to decide these measures within their own stores, rather than a standard application across all public areas?
You know jaye that you and I share many values and opinions across a broad array of topics
BUT
I find myself in agreement with the French ban
and here's why;
If an african man walked down the street with a ball and chain around his leg and claimed
"I choose to wear this ball and chain. My master wants me to wear it and I am in total agreement with him. You are taking away MY rights to wear this ball and chain by banning it.
I WANT to wear this ball and chain.
I CHOOSE to wear this ball and chain.
I feel safest when i wear this ball and chain.
Who are YOU to deny me my right to wear this ball and chain?
it's MY choice to wear this ball and chain. "
How should we react to this "opinion". This "right"?
I'm looking forward to your reply because if anyone could come up with one that could possible convince me it's you.
So long as it is his genuine choice and he is not holding up traffic, it is his right.
, imposes myriad legal requirements on whoever his master might be, but it does not compell him to do anything.