Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 
Send Topic Print
the right to choose what to wear (Read 29265 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48871
At my desk.
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #150 - May 1st, 2011 at 10:32pm
 
Sir lastnail wrote on May 1st, 2011 at 7:50pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 30th, 2011 at 1:41pm:
Quote:
So if someone believes in a religion which stipulates that they have to murder people with red hair is that ok for you ??


No. Why?


so it's ok to go and murder people just because some preacher or some  old book says so and you believe in it ??


No. Why?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21701
A cat with a view
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #151 - May 2nd, 2011 at 9:54am
 
freediver wrote on May 1st, 2011 at 6:09pm:
Plenty of reasons. I imagine the stains would be hard to get out too.

This is about rights, not what I choose to do with those rights.






Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 30th, 2011 at 12:10pm:

So if someone believes in a religion which stipulates that they have to murder people with red hair is that ok for you ?? Should we let them do it just because they believe in it ?






FD,

So if a particular group of people ascribe certain 'rights' to themselves, you are OK with that group of people pursuing those rights, because, they are 'rights' ???

i.e. defending 'rights', is virtuous.



FD,

Here is an imperative, a 'right', which ISLAM ascribes to moslems, and which moslems DO 'exercise'...

"...If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him."

hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #004.052.260

A 'right' which moslems do 'exercise', even when moslems live among non-moslems ???

Google;
uk moslem honour killings


FD,

#1, Your OK for moslems to live among us.
#2, Your OK for moslems to, assert themselves as moslems, as moslems are want to do [i.e. it is OK for moslems to 'assume' their 'right' to kill those persons who offend their religion, e.g. by leaving it.]???
#3, Moslems can 'assert' themselves [i.e. be good moslems, while living among us] because moslems have 'rights' ?


I come back to my argument about the wisdom, of assuming, in this PC world, that it is ok for 'sheep' and 'wolves' to share the same 'meadow'.

The opinion of many, is that it is OK.

I disagree.

I say that 'sheep' and 'wolves' need to be separated.




Back to top
« Last Edit: May 2nd, 2011 at 10:05am by Yadda »  

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48871
At my desk.
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #152 - May 2nd, 2011 at 10:14am
 
Quote:
So if a particular group of people ascribe certain 'rights' to themselves, you are OK with that group of people pursuing those rights, because, they are 'rights' ???


No. For example, that is why I did not concede Soren should have the right to rip clothes from a woman's body merely because he ascribed himself the 'right' to see what was under them. I am obviously referring to genuine rights, not whatever someone makes up on the spot.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #153 - May 2nd, 2011 at 10:26am
 
I have avoided referring to the religious aspect of this debate, and concentrated on the fact that I believe our society is one in which we are not comfortable having people go about their daily lives in masks, and I still believe that, but I should be honest and acknowledge that I also object to the veiling of women because of religious and cultural beliefs also.

I disbelieve the arguments that these women freely choose to make the independent decision to hide themselves completely from society.

I accept that some of them honestly believe that it is their choice, but I also believe they have lost the ability to make a truly independent personal decision because of the religious and cultural restraints that have been imposed upon them.

I believe they have the right to freely display their religious, and cultural beliefs, only up to the point where it has an unwarranted negative impact upon them, the society they live in, or both.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48871
At my desk.
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #154 - May 2nd, 2011 at 10:35am
 
When does the impact become 'unwarranted'? When people like Soren complain about it?

People make themselves slaves to all sort of things. Like consumerism. It is not for the government to dictate what ideologies or practices people can submit themselves to. They must merely protect people's freedom to change their mind.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21701
A cat with a view
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #155 - May 2nd, 2011 at 10:36am
 
freediver wrote on May 2nd, 2011 at 10:14am:
Quote:
So if a particular group of people ascribe certain 'rights' to themselves, you are OK with that group of people pursuing those rights, because, they are 'rights' ???


No. For example, that is why I did not concede Soren should have the right to rip clothes from a woman's body merely because he ascribed himself the 'right' to see what was under them. I am obviously referring to genuine rights, not whatever someone makes up on the spot.





FD,

But moslems DO have a 'lawful' right, to murder those who offend their religion.

This is no 'frivolous', 'made up', right.

Allah gives all moslems that right.

And he is their God.

IMAGE
...
Moslem 'entitlement' expressed.




FD,

#1, Your OK for moslems to live among us     [see image above].
#2, Your OK for moslems to, assert themselves as moslems, as moslems are want to do [i.e. it is OK for moslems to 'assume' their 'right' to kill those persons who offend their religion, e.g. by leaving it.]???
#3, Moslems can 'assert' themselves [i.e. be good moslems, while living among us] because moslems have 'rights' ?






A REALITY, WHICH MANY PEOPLE DO NOT WANT TO CONFRONT....

Quote:

Here, for example, are two very illuminating passages from the canonical Life of Mohammed by Ibn Ishaq, as translated by A. Guillaume, and a third passage, from the earliest known Muslim historian.

Ishaq: 204 - "'Men, do you know what you are pledging yourselves to in swearing allegiance to this man [Muhammad]?' 'Yes. In swearing allegiance to him we are pledging to wage war against all mankind.'"

Ishaq:231 - "Muslims are one ummah (community) to the exclusion of all men. Believers are friends of one another to the exclusion of all outsiders."

And here is Al-Tabari, a very early Muslim historian, in book 9, chapter or section 69, reporting words that Muslims believe to have been said by Mohammed himself - "Killing infidels is a small matter to us".

These texts are not fossils from a distant past. They are not dead letters. They are still 'live' and carry tremendous weight in the imagination and practice of many Muslims around the world.
...DDA




Google it.

n.b.
"Killing infidels is a small matter to us"


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48871
At my desk.
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #156 - May 2nd, 2011 at 10:37am
 
Quote:
But moslems DO have a 'lawful' right, to murder those who offend their religion.


Where do they have this right?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #157 - May 2nd, 2011 at 10:59am
 
freediver wrote on May 2nd, 2011 at 10:35am:
When does the impact become 'unwarranted'? When people like Soren complain about it?

People make themselves slaves to all sort of things. Like consumerism. It is not for the government to dictate what ideologies or practices people can submit themselves to. They must merely protect people's freedom to change their mind.


I fully agree with you, in principle, that we should allow people as much freedom as possible, to make their own decisions, right, or wrong.
With regard to the impact of the veil, for me it is a sign of male domination over women, which I do not want condoned in any way, it is also a validation for extremists like the Taliban, who will slash, acid burn, and murder, women who challenge their authority to have women always hide themselves, and every western woman who comes forward claiming it is her choice to wear the veil, is assisting the Taliban in their systematic torture and repression of women.
There is also the factor of fear and mistrust, between muslims and western society, and wearing masks in public only helps to reinforce that separation and exacerbate the feelings of fear and mistrust which could have been diminished with something as simple as an open smile.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21701
A cat with a view
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #158 - May 2nd, 2011 at 11:08am
 
freediver wrote on May 2nd, 2011 at 10:37am:
Quote:
But moslems DO have a 'lawful' right, to murder those who offend their religion.



Where do they have this right?





FD,

Google;
uk muslim daughter Banaz Mahmod murdered suitcase


FD,
The 'right' of this moslem woman [the victim], to her life [under our law] did not protect her....
....from the right of her father [under ISLAMIC], to kill her.


AND AGAIN, I SAY....

Yadda wrote on May 2nd, 2011 at 9:54am:

I come back to my argument about the wisdom, of assuming, in this PC world, that it is ok for 'sheep' and 'wolves' to share the same 'meadow'.

The opinion of many, is that it is OK.

I disagree.

I say that 'sheep' and 'wolves' need to be separated.







'Wolves' in the 'meadow' are not going to respect the right of 'sheep' to not be accosted or killed, by the 'wolves'.





+++

FD....
"Where do they [moslems] have this right [to kill those who offend their religion]?"


FD,
In response, i pose this question...

In what place [in which country], where there are moslem communities, have moslems not killed their own children [and non-moslems], because moslems were ready to 'assume' that 'right', which ISLAM gave to them ???

Name one nation where moslems reside, where moslems have not murdered others [who came into their power], in the name of ISLAM.



+++

ISLAMIC law *sanctifies* the murder of wives under certain circumstances, e.g. apostasy ['rebellion' against ISLAM's authority].

ISLAMIC law *specifically* gives moslem men, the right to kill their children [and grandchildren].

e.g.
"British girl kidnapped by Saudi father: "I told [the police] he was keeping me there against my will and all they said was, 'He's your father, if he wants he can kill you'."
Indeed, traditional Islamic law does not prescribe retaliation against a parent for killing his or her child. For example: "not subject to retaliation" is "a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring." ('Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2)." "

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/04/british-girl-kidnapped-by-saudi-father-i-told-...

The murder of moslem women and children often goes *unreported* within moslem families - even in Western nations.

Because such 'events' [within families] are not even crimes within ISLAMIC law.






Back to top
« Last Edit: May 2nd, 2011 at 3:49pm by Yadda »  

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48871
At my desk.
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #159 - May 2nd, 2011 at 11:13am
 
mozzaok wrote on May 2nd, 2011 at 10:59am:
freediver wrote on May 2nd, 2011 at 10:35am:
When does the impact become 'unwarranted'? When people like Soren complain about it?

People make themselves slaves to all sort of things. Like consumerism. It is not for the government to dictate what ideologies or practices people can submit themselves to. They must merely protect people's freedom to change their mind.


I fully agree with you, in principle, that we should allow people as much freedom as possible, to make their own decisions, right, or wrong.
With regard to the impact of the veil, for me it is a sign of male domination over women, which I do not want condoned in any way, it is also a validation for extremists like the Taliban, who will slash, acid burn, and murder, women who challenge their authority to have women always hide themselves, and every western woman who comes forward claiming it is her choice to wear the veil, is assisting the Taliban in their systematic torture and repression of women.
There is also the factor of fear and mistrust, between muslims and western society, and wearing masks in public only helps to reinforce that separation and exacerbate the feelings of fear and mistrust which could have been diminished with something as simple as an open smile.


So what do you suggest?

Also, how does it help the Taliban? I expect it would undermine them as it shows that even in the west Muslims can do it their way.

Quote:
Google;
uk muslim father daughter found in suitcase


Yadda they do not have the legal right to do that in the UK.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21701
A cat with a view
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #160 - May 2nd, 2011 at 11:46am
 
freediver wrote on May 2nd, 2011 at 11:13am:
Quote:
Google;
uk muslim father daughter found in suitcase


Yadda they do not have the legal right to do that in the UK.






FD,

No, not according to our laws.

But the point is, that according to ISLAMIC law, they do have a 'legal' right to murder [those who offend their religion].



But FD, assuming your point of the argument.....
If moslems do NOT have the legal right to murder people [according to our laws], then why are many moslems breaking our laws in that regard,
...AND THEN JUSTIFYING THEIR CONDUCT IN OUR COURTS, BY REFERRING TO ISLAMIC LAW ???


Doesn't this conduct by many moslems demonstrate, that many moslems, will have no respect for our laws, unless someone is watching them ???

And if moslems commonly, show that they have no respect our laws [and the 'rights' which those laws protect], then shouldn't we assume that moslems who live among us, will have no respect, FOR OUR RIGHTS ???







INCITING MOSLEMS TO MURDER NON-MOSLEMS....
....BUT, JUSTIFIED BY ISLAM, AND ISLAM's LAW;

Quote:

25 May 2007
"......Al-Faisal spent years travelling the UK preaching racial hatred urging his audience to kill Jews, Hindus and Westerners.
......But throughout the trial he denied he had intended to incite people to violence.
......he argued his talks came from the Koran and if he was on trial so was the holy text."



http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6692243.stm

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #161 - May 2nd, 2011 at 12:49pm
 
freediver wrote on May 2nd, 2011 at 10:14am:
Quote:
So if a particular group of people ascribe certain 'rights' to themselves, you are OK with that group of people pursuing those rights, because, they are 'rights' ???


No. For example, that is why I did not concede Soren should have the right to rip clothes from a woman's body merely because he ascribed himself the 'right' to see what was under them. I am obviously referring to genuine rights, not whatever someone makes up on the spot.



Not that I ever claimed a right to rip off their veils. WHat I actually claimed was the right not to deal with them while they are covering their faces. But as Jack Straw's experience showed, that right is not readily recognised.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48871
At my desk.
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #162 - May 2nd, 2011 at 1:41pm
 
Quote:
But the point is, that according to ISLAMIC law, they do have a 'legal' right to murder [those who offend their religion].


OK. Thanks for finally getting to the point.

Quote:
And if moslems commonly, show that they have no respect our laws [and the 'rights' which those laws protect], then shouldn't we assume that moslems who live among us, will have no respect, FOR OUR RIGHTS ???


Sure. Just like you and Soren have no respect for them either. Like I said you must both be stopped.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21701
A cat with a view
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #163 - May 2nd, 2011 at 2:24pm
 
freediver wrote on May 2nd, 2011 at 1:41pm:
Quote:
And if moslems commonly, show that they have no respect our laws [and the 'rights' which those laws protect], then shouldn't we assume that moslems who live among us, will have no respect, FOR OUR RIGHTS ???


Sure. Just like you and Soren have no respect for them either. Like I said you must both be stopped.






Yes FD,

It is so, so, unjust for people like myself, to despise ISLAM.
And so unjust for people like myself, to seek to 'oppress' moslems, by seeking to make moslems accountable for the consequences of their own choices, and for the consequences of their own fascist worldview .
/sarc off




Yadda said...
A moslem, is a person who chooses to embrace a philosophy [ISLAM] which tells moslems that it is 'lawful' for moslems, to kill those who do not believe, as they believe.




"....the death of those who are killed for the cause of God gives more impetus to the cause, which continues to thrive on their blood."

ISLAMIC scholar, Sayyid Qutb





Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48871
At my desk.
Re: the right to choose what to wear
Reply #164 - May 2nd, 2011 at 9:31pm
 
Yadda, it is not that simple. If you actually had the balls to follow through on your logic, you would be far more dangerous than a typical Muslim. The danger always comes from those who can only see things in black and white rather than the reality we are faced with. You are basically an anti-Muslim version of the worst kind of Muslim. Pointing to the insidious threat posed by Islam does not mask the insidious threat of your own ideology. You think that to beat Islam we must become it at it's own game. You are wrong.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 
Send Topic Print