freediver wrote on May 1
st, 2011 at 6:09pm:
Plenty of reasons. I imagine the stains would be hard to get out too.
This is about rights, not what I choose to do with those rights.
Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 30
th, 2011 at 12:10pm:
So if someone believes in a religion which stipulates that they have to murder people with red hair is that ok for you ?? Should we let them do it just because they believe in it ?
FD,
So if a particular group of people ascribe certain 'rights'
to themselves, you are OK with that group of people pursuing those rights, because, they are 'rights' ???
i.e. defending 'rights', is virtuous.
FD,
Here is an imperative, a 'right', which ISLAM ascribes to moslems, and which moslems DO 'exercise'...
"...If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him."
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #004.052.260
A 'right' which moslems do 'exercise', even when moslems live among non-moslems ???
Google;
uk moslem honour killingsFD,
#1, Your OK for moslems to live among us.
#2, Your OK for moslems to,
assert themselves as moslems, as moslems are want to do [i.e. it is OK for moslems to 'assume' their 'right' to kill those persons who offend their religion, e.g. by leaving it.]???
#3, Moslems can 'assert' themselves [i.e.
be good moslems, while living among us] because moslems have 'rights' ?
I come back to my argument about the wisdom, of assuming, in this PC world, that it is ok for 'sheep' and 'wolves' to share the same 'meadow'.
The opinion of many, is that it is OK.
I disagree.
I say that 'sheep' and 'wolves' need to be separated.