Soren wrote on Apr 13
th, 2013 at 9:56pm:
Refusing to engage with the idea of god (atheism) is an unimaginatively rebellious stance. It is temperamental hissyfit rather than an honest, self-revealing before one's own eyes kind of stance. I think a lot of it is really anticleticalism.
Still, being militantly or mildly against something that doesn't actually require you to be for or against it is quite jejune. Living your life as defined by opposition to something you don't believe in - how wasteful, not to say manic, is that?
We're not born scared of the dark.
We acquire that fear, during our early years, of goblins, ghosts and bogeymen who live in closets and come out to haunt us at night.
And we learn or invent mantras to keep us safe and swap them with our peers (along with tales of terror to justify our burgeoning belief in metaphysical menace).
But comes the day (usually) when, along with Santa, we begin to doubt our earliest beliefs and realise, sometimes with nostalgic regret, that our evil entities of the night do not really exist except in our fertile imagination... And we no longer believe.
And from that day, when things go bump in the night, we're sure enough that hobgoblins are not the cause, but something mundane - something responding to gravity or motion (more likely) - has collided with another or fallen.
But we do not 'believe in our disbelief' as we once believed in ghosts in the closet.
We are (if you must) 'a-spectre-ists' - and not from having thrown a hissy fit - but from having naturally grown away from believing in the fantastically improbable and towards acceptance of a more mundane (and, yes, much less colourful), yet eminently more likely, truth.