muso wrote on Feb 3
rd, 2013 at 10:53am:
NorthOfNorth wrote on Feb 2
nd, 2013 at 6:49pm:
Yes... Like "I know what quality is, but now that you ask me, I don't".
But I think we mean something specific when we posit that atheism is (or isn't) a religion (in the way that legislators or demographers know what they mean specifically with the term 'religion').
My definition of 'religion', in the spirit (pardon the pun!) that I think it is intended here in this thread should include :
- Founded on a metaphysical proposition of which the believer does not necessarily require empirical evidence.
- Offers a complete and infallible explanation of cosmic creation.
- Defines the meaning of existence
- Posits a cosmic creator or creators or primary concept.
- Prescribes human conduct by associating physical sensibilities with moral imperatives as cosmic law.
- Requires submission, reverence and obedience to an unalterable doctrine.
That definition doesn't work for many Eastern religions. It doesn't work for Jainism, some Buddhism, virtually all animism and traditional African religions, and some flavours of Hinduism. It doesn't work for Religious Naturalism either, and I'd consider that to be a religion. Then there's Unitarian Universalism, Neo Paganism and some kinds of Pantheism. Pantheism is an interesting one.
Mostly true, I'm sure.
But we use terms with regard to the vernacular of the culture in which we live.
When we ask the question 'Are you religious?' in general conversation, we nearly always mean something specific to our 'Western' roots... Being a definition that conforms largely to our Abrahamic cultural tradition.
Yes, of course, language can (and does) change including a culture's vernacular. But the term 'religion' still maintains its definition to the majority (as above) as used in Australia.
I'd guess that if you were a neo-Pagan or a Naturalist, you'd more than likely answer the question 'Are you religious', by qualifying the term... in the knowledge that the term has a specific meaning (even if you'd call it baggage) in this culture.
If this thread is about anything, its about questioning a parallel between atheism and theism... If religion means 'whatever' then everything is a 'religion' - rendering the word meaningless... Currently, in our vernacular, the term means something specific.
As Bill Maher quipped "Atheism is a religion, like abstinence is a sex position'.