Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
NZ MP Farewells Freedom Fighter (Read 10294 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49071
At my desk.
Re: NZ MP Farewells Freedom Fighter
Reply #60 - May 16th, 2011 at 6:53pm
 
Quote:
Are you capable of doing any research for yourself, or do you need everything spoon fed to you.

Besides, you wouldn't believe me anyway, so why ask.


I have done my research. I ask because I want to know what you think.

Quote:
Read my post again again....i'm not defending Abu at all.


For someone who isn't defending Abu you are going to extraordinary lengths to defend him. You answer all the questions I direct at him (or at least, you respond with vaccuous insults) but won't answer any questions directed at you.

Quote:
Its a sad individual that trolls message boards trying to get 'information' about a poster.


Are you suggesting that asking for Abu's opinion on Osama is stalking or something?

Quote:
Yet Islamic law was implemented in India for hundreds of years. So once again, history exposes your ignorance for what it is.


So why is it you can't tell us what the proper Islamic punishment for paganism is? Isn't it hypocritical of you to accuse me of being ignorant of what the proper punishment is when you can't answer yourself?

Quote:
Islam welcomes pagans into the fold, raises their status, and they flourish as muslims. Where they were once blind, they can now see.


When I asked what the punishment was, I was obviously referring to pagans who don't convert to Islam.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: NZ MP Farewells Freedom Fighter
Reply #61 - Jun 3rd, 2011 at 9:45am
 
abu_rashid wrote on May 7th, 2011 at 12:57pm:
As the Dutch were not Muslims, yes the Maccassans.

But the situation can be applied wholesale to every land that Muslims ever travelled to. They never eradicated or colonised or subjugated local populations, they treated them as equals and offered them membership of the Islamic Caliphate.


What history books to you read?
Pity that history disagrees with your tale.
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21779
A cat with a view
Re: NZ MP Farewells Freedom Fighter
Reply #62 - Jun 3rd, 2011 at 11:16am
 
abu_rashid wrote on May 7th, 2011 at 12:57pm:
As the Dutch were not Muslims, yes the Maccassans.

But the situation can be applied wholesale to every land that Muslims ever travelled to. They never eradicated or colonised
or subjugated local populations
, they treated them as equals and offered them membership of the Islamic Caliphate.





Abu,

That is untrue.

ISLAMIC doctrine requires that the native peoples of new lands, be FIRST, 'invited' to embrace ISLAM,
...IF THEY REFUSE, they are required to pay tribute money to moslems,
...IF THEY REFUSE to be pay tribute money to moslems and refuse the subjugation [over their lives] of moslem authority [under Sharia law], then they [and indeed any person] may be, and often were, 'lawfully' slaughtered, for 'offending' Allah/ISLAM.

ISLAM's doctrines, give the lie to what you have said.

ISLAM promotes muslim superiority and ISLAMIC supremacism.

And wherever ISLAM was spread by the sword, moslems always subjugated local native peoples.

Wherever ISLAM was spread 'peacefully' by the persuasion, moslems subsequently, always forcefully subjugated the remaining local non-moslem peoples.

What you assert, is not in accord with ISLAM's history [of seeking, and imposing ISLAMIC supremacism, upon native peoples],  is not in accord with ISLAM's own doctrine [of required moslem superiority], nor  is it in accord with what ISLAM's own foundation texts declare.






EVIDENCE in support of my claims...


From ISLAMIC texts...

"A man came to the Prophet and asked, "A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah's Cause?" The Prophet said, "He who fights that Allah's Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause." "
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #004.052.065
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #004.052.080i


"Allah 's Apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' ...."
hadithsunnah/bukhari #004.052.196


"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. "
Koran 9.29




Examples from statements made today, by our contemporary ISLAMIC 'authorities'...

Pakistani cleric: 'We want Islamic law for all Pakistan and then the world. We would like to do this by preaching. But if not then we would use force.'

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2007/12/pakistani-cleric-we-want-islamic-law-for-all-p...



Creed of the sword
September 23, 2006
...the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Abdel Aziz al-Sheikh.
...Saudi Arabia's most senior cleric also explained.....THE THIRD OPTION OF VIOLENCE AGAINST NON-MUSLIMS WAS ONLY A LAST RESORT, IF THEY REFUSED TO CONVERT OR SURRENDER PEACEFULLY TO THE ARMIES OF ISLAM.
...The resulting doctrine of war was described by the great medieval philosopher Ibn Khaldun: "In the Muslim community, the holy war (jihad) is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the (Muslim) mission and the (obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force." (The Muqaddimah)

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/creed-of-the-sword/story-e6frg6n6-111111225...

n.b.
"...In the Muslim community, the holy war (jihad) is a religious duty"


"...the (obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force."




In another example, a respected moslem community spokesman has told Australian moslems that they must shun "secular and erroneous concepts such as democracy and freedom".

"Leaders of the global Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir have called on Australian Muslims to spurn secular democracy and Western notions of moderate Islam....
    British Hizb ut-Tahrir leader Burhan Hanif told participants at a conference in western Sydney yesterday that democracy is "haram" (forbidden) for Muslims, whose political engagement should be be based purely on Islamic law.
    "We must adhere to Islam and Islam alone," Mr Hanif told about 500 participants attending the convention in Lidcombe."

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/07/australia-members-of-hizb-ut-tahrir-say-countr...




All moslems understand that under authentic ISLAM, all moslems have a religious obligation to undermine and destroy any other [societal] authority, and replace it with Sharia [ISLAMIC law].



An Oz moslem cleric, explains ISLAM's reason for being....

IMAGE
...

Australian Islamic leader defends jihad.
".....Abu Bakr says he does not accept other religions.
"I am telling you that my religion doesn't tolerate other religion. It doesn't tolerate," he said.
"The only one law which needs to spread, it can be here or anywhere else, is Islam." "

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200508/s1430551.htm




Abu ???


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print