Australian Politics Forum - abu viewing osama positively

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: abu viewing osama positively Reply #15 - May 16^th, 2011 at 1:09pm Do you really think that the jihadis would have accepted the jurisdiction of a non-sharia court in NYC?
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 95296 Gender:	Re: abu viewing osama positively Reply #16 - May 16^th, 2011 at 1:39pm Soren wrote on May 16^th, 2011 at 1:09pm: Do you really think that the jihadis would have accepted the jurisdiction of a non-sharia court in NYC? Alas, they don't seem to accept the jurisdiction of the non-Sharia Navy Seals.
Back to top	IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: abu viewing osama positively
Reply #17 - May 16^th, 2011 at 10:41pm

Karnal wrote on May 16^th, 2011 at 1:39pm:

Soren wrote on May 16^th, 2011 at 1:09pm:

Do you really think that the jihadis would have accepted the jurisdiction of a non-sharia court in NYC?

Alas, they don't seem to accept the jurisdiction of the non-Sharia Navy Seals.

Sheik Bharruck Hussein O'Bama al-Presidenshid al-Amerikani sent them. That Hussein must count for something. Not many Christians or Jews are called Hussein. Still no good?

Is Prez Hussein an apostate or a taqiyya-merchant?

Back to top

« Last Edit: May 16^th, 2011 at 10:47pm by Soren »

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 103122 Melbourne Gender:	Re: abu viewing osama positively Reply #18 - May 17^th, 2011 at 12:04am I don't think Abu should be allowed to be a moderator here unless he renounces terrorism in all it's forms.
Back to top	IP Logged

NorthOfNorth

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male

Re: abu viewing osama positively
Reply #19 - May 17^th, 2011 at 9:22am

muso wrote on May 16^th, 2011 at 11:10am:

It's a pity that he didn't receive a trial. It would have done the victims some good, and he could have then rotted away in obscurity in some remote penitentiary, where hopefully he could have attracted the 'affections' of bubba and friends.

Instead, they gave him a quick death and an instant martyrdom.

The capture and a trial of bin Laden would have been out of the question... It would most likely have had the potential to regalvanise support for an organisation that has virtually already been destroyed. Al Qaeda lost the hearts and minds of Arab Muslims a long time ago. The Afghani Taliban, I'd say, are as relieved as the Americans that bin Laden is gone... Even more so that he was not located in Afghanistan. The greatest casualty of the location and killing of bin Laden is Pakistan. The diplomatic fallout from this (Pakistani) disaster will be huge for that country.

They have been exposed as corrupt, treacherous and not worthy of leading diplomatic initiatives in the region...

The nation that stands to gain the most out of this Pakistani mess is India, which can now take the moral and diplomatic upper hand in redefining the region over the next few years.

Back to top

Conviction is the art of being certain

IP Logged

Amadd

Gold Member

Offline

Mo

Posts: 6217

Re: abu viewing osama positively
Reply #20 - May 17^th, 2011 at 9:51am

In the western world, I don't think that it's been such a big thing. All too little, all too late.

We got no pics and no satisfiable proof for the "Johnny come lately" extermination of a world-wide pest.
It doesn't mean too much now that the damage is done.

All that it means is that our "government" is not taking sides with us

I wouldn't have expected to see any more less than what they have displayed.
I am not disappointed when they have merely lived up to my non-expectation. I always knew that they were dirty filthy pieces of crap.

There is no victory in getting Osama's head now. It's all too late.

They failed. And they will not even show us the head now.

I want to see the head!!! Right now!!!!! ...Those failures.

...but fail to submit a tax return...and yeah....there's nowhere to hide.i

Back to top

« Last Edit: May 17^th, 2011 at 9:59am by Amadd »

IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: abu viewing osama positively Reply #21 - May 18^th, 2011 at 11:50am So I've heard that the titles include: Islam Bam Thank you Ma'am Dahab does Dalalabad Goatback Mountain, and Boobie trap
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

Yadda

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 21612
A cat with a view

Re: abu viewing osama positively
Reply #22 - May 19^th, 2011 at 8:28am

Bobby. wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 12:04am:

I don't think Abu should be allowed to be a moderator here unless
he renounces terrorism in all it's forms.

bobby, bobby, bobby, ....you dumb, dumb, infidel!

Of course Abu renounces terrorism in all it's forms.

+++

According to ISLAM / moslems...

Terrorism is what non-moslems are guilty of.

Good moslems will declare [to non-moslems] until they are blue in the face, that;

Quote:

All moslems condemn terrorism.

But when moslems make such assertions, moslems never reveal that...

ISLAMISTS define 'terrorism' as, ...resisting Allah's will [to spread Allah's 'perfect' religion].

Google;
terrorism, is resisting islam

i.e.
Whenever non-moslems try to resist the ISLAMISATION of their society, or try to prevent ISLAMIST violence.
....good moslems present such actions [within their own moslem community], as 'oppression' and 'violence' against moslems by non-moslems!

Hence such actions by non-moslems, are regarded as 'terrorism' - by good moslems.

e.g.

Quote:

Bashir calls bombers 'counter-terrorists'
June 26, 2007
HARDLINE Islamic cleric Abu Bakar Bashir said today that extremists blamed for Indonesian bombings were role models for other Muslims and feted them as "counter-terrorists."
"There are no terrorists in Indonesia. What there are, are counter-terrorists," Bashir said.
......But he called on Indonesian Muslims to refrain from accusing people of terrorism, saying it would be tantamount to assisting the US.
Bashir spoke at a press conference to announce plans, together with 13 lawyers from the "Team for the Defence of Muslims," to file a suit demanding that Indonesia's counter-terrorism police unit be disbanded.
Lawyer Munarman alleged that the counter-terrorism squad was financed opaquely by the US, sought to make war against Islam and used torture to secure admissions from suspects.
He also said that the squad was discriminatory as it only acted against Muslims, adding the team planned to file the suit on tomorrow at the South Jakarta district court.
Bashir has redoubled his efforts to get Sharia law enforced in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, since his release from prison.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21973518-23109,00.html

and...

'AGGRESSION IS SOMETHING ONLY INFIDELS DO'

Quote:

"......[resorting] to force to disseminate Islam is not war (harb), a word that is used only to describe the use of force by non-Muslims. Islamic wars are not hurub (the plural of harb) but rather futuhat, acts of "opening" the world to Islam and expressing Islamic jihad. Relations between dar al-Islam, the home of peace, and dar al-harb, the world of unbelievers, nevertheless take place in a state of war, according to the Qur'an and to the authoritative commentaries of Islamic jurists. Unbelievers who stand in the way, CREATING OBSTACLES FOR THE DA'WA, ARE BLAMED FOR THIS STATE OF WAR, for the da'wa can be pursued peacefully if others submit to it. IN OTHER WORDS, THOSE WHO RESIST ISLAM CAUSE WARS and are responsible for them.
.....Aggression is something only infidels do.
.....it is not seen as aggression or war when Muslims attack non-Muslims. On the contrary, it is seen as aggression when non-Muslims resist the Islamization of their lands and thus "place obstacles in the way" of the spread of Islam. They are defying the will of Allah.......subjugation to Islam alone can bring peace.....
......[To the ISLAMIST mind, 'aggression' is...] When non-Muslims do anything to preserve their culture and resist the Islamization of their country."

"ISLAM SEEKS PEACE - Oh really!"
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1258072652/1#1

n.b.
"......[resorting] to force to disseminate Islam is not war (harb), a word that is used only to describe the use of force by non-Muslims. Islamic wars are not hurub (the plural of harb) but rather futuhat, acts of "opening"

i.e.
When moslems use violence against 'unbelievers', moslems are merely 'inviting' non-moslems to embrace ISLAM [...and hoping that non-moslems will have the common-sense to accept their 'invitation', to enjoy the 'peace' which ISLAM offers to all men].
/sarc off

That, is the twisted logic which all good moslems fully embrace, a 'logic' which is used to justify all of their violence against 'unbelievers'.

+++

more on this moslem SOPHISTRY here...

"Sharia Australia"
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1295543010/13#13

+++

The truth is that ISLAM is a deceptive and violent philosophy, a cult, which creates a mental pathology, in those human beings who embrace it.

That mental pathology which afflicts all good moslems, is so all encompassing, that all moslems will deny any accountability for the consequences of their own choices.

And moslems always place all of the blame, for the consequences of moslem violence against non-moslems, upon the victims [of moslem violence]. [e.g. Jews, Israel]

Moslems always reject all accountability, for the consequences of THEIR OWN INTENTIONS, AND THEIR OWN ACTIONS IN THE WORLD.

Back to top

« Last Edit: May 19^th, 2011 at 9:29am by Yadda »

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31

IP Logged

Yadda

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 21612
A cat with a view

Re: abu viewing osama positively
Reply #23 - May 19^th, 2011 at 9:51am

Yadda wrote on May 19^th, 2011 at 8:28am:

Whenever non-moslems try to resist the ISLAMISATION of their society, or try to prevent ISLAMIST violence.
....good moslems present such actions [within their own moslem community], as 'oppression' and 'violence' against moslems by non-moslems!

e.g.

"Five Australian jihadists convicted - Sister, 'its not fair' "

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/02/15/2819965.htm
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/02/australia-5-jihadists-motivated-by-intolerant-...

"..The sister for one of the convicted men said...that the sentence is not fair to her community or religion."

It was reported, that her brother liked to watch videos of moslems beheading non-moslems, and now he can't,
...for a very long time.

And it's just not fair!!

Australians laws are so unfair.

COMMENT;

This woman clearly identifies herself as a moslem.

And has clearly declared that she believes,

"...that the sentence is not fair to her community or religion."

As a moslem, this woman [along with all moslems] is effectively declaring;

"ISLAM gives us moslems the right to use violence to impose our value system upon you non-moslems.
Your non-moslem laws are illegal, and unjust.
And it is evil, and unjust, for you to use your laws to resist our Jihad, against you."

COMMENT;

And i assure you, imo, that that, is the mindset which all good moslems share.

i.e.
Moslems are always innocent, and always 'victims'.

And whenever non-moslems try to resist the ISLAMISATION of their society, or try to prevent ISLAMIST violence associated with moslems trying to spread the influence of ISLAM, non-moslems are always portrayed [within the moslem community] as persecuting and oppressing, innocent moslems.

+++

The victims of ISLAMIC Jihad violence, are ALWAYS portrayed [by moslems] as aggressors, for defending themselves from the violent, murderous, rage of ISLAM's adherents.

Merely to criticise moslem violence [towards non-moslems], is portrayed by moslems, as the 'oppression' of moslems.

Back to top

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95296
Gender: male

Re: abu viewing osama positively
Reply #24 - May 19^th, 2011 at 11:20am

Soren wrote on May 16^th, 2011 at 10:41pm:

Karnal wrote on May 16^th, 2011 at 1:39pm:

Soren wrote on May 16^th, 2011 at 1:09pm:

Do you really think that the jihadis would have accepted the jurisdiction of a non-sharia court in NYC?

Alas, they don't seem to accept the jurisdiction of the non-Sharia Navy Seals.

Sheik Bharruck Hussein O'Bama al-Presidenshid al-Amerikani sent them. That Hussein must count for something. Not many Christians or Jews are called Hussein. Still no good?

Is Prez Hussein an apostate or a taqiyya-merchant?

Effende, you listen to Sarah Palin. This is very good, number one lady. She will be next president of US of A.

In my country, we love Amerika. It is India that is cause of all problems in world today.

Back to top

IP Logged