Grey,
Quote:Are you saying that people, particularly women, are never executed or flogged under Sharia law Abu?
Where did I say that? I see why you're trying to equate any act of physical punishment with shari'ah, because it's about as good as your argument is going to get....
This rationale is about as relevant as saying that if an American executes a shoplifter in his store, then he's acting according to Democratic/American law, since it can prescribe the death penalty for armed robbers.
Absolute nonsense.
Bobby,
Quote:He says that he supports Sharia law yet rejects the
lashing of a 14 year old girl to death which can happen under Sharia Law.
As above. So you believe in the Australian/Democratic practice of imprisoning those who break the law? Therefore you must support if someone captures somebody they believe has broken the law and chains them up in their cellar, since that's what Australian/Democratic law prescribes right?
Quote:Abu is full of contradictions - another one:
He has sympathy for Osama being executed but rejects terrorism.
As I don't believe he's a terrorist. In fact he was a staunch defender of innocents against the grand scale terrorism of the West.
Anyway, regarding the defective reasoning that any kind of vigilantism must equate to shari'ah law, this topic has been discussed on this board at great length, I'd advise you to read over the large number of threads where it's been refuted over and over again. Just search for "honour murder" and you're bound to find plenty of refutations of it.