Yes Phil. My feeling is that if Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 he got what he deserved.

However I also have doubts.

As you say his group denied responsibility and it is a group which had previously been proud to claim responsibility for other actions.

They had been identified within days of the incident and only really accused by the same guys who told us that they had proof that Iraq had WMD's etc. (hardly a credible source)

In a situation where the US intelligence had to find someone to point the finger at quickly to restore their own credibility it would not be difficult to see them finding a scapegoat answer - someone who they knew to be a bad guy and deserved it anyway. (for other reasons)

I hope he was responsible for this but I somewhat doubt it.

Quote:
By Dnaever


Really, I guess you might be getting swayed to believe that the American government like Bush and the CIA committed this brutal act AGAINST THERE OWN PEOPLE, is that the other alternative your leaning on ???

Quote:


And what are the unexplained components to this story that would make you think and question what the established mainstream version is that Al Qaeda which is said to be controlled and under the leadership of Osama bin laden in that time was responsible for 9/11 ???

Quote:


I suspect that THERE WOULD BE RIGHTIES OUT THERE WHO WOULD SYMPATHIZE WITH THE GOD WHO SHARES IN SOME OF THEIR  AMERICAN MANTRA, AND BELIEVE THAT THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD,  LIKE GRORGE BUSH WOULD BR INCAPABLE OF LYING WHEN HE SAYS IRAQ HAS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND SADDAM HUSSEIN WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE 9/11 ATTACKS.

Quote:



You are the one in question over the official mainstream version of the story behind 9/11, you are the one that maybe entertaining the idea that it was an INSIDE JOB, ????

stryder wrote on Jun 18^th, 2011 at 11:06am:


I never said that the unexplained components of the story had a relationship to who caused it to happen.

My understanding for years had been that for a building to collapse down on itself in a controlled manner was extremely unlikely. This is the reason that demolition teams were routinely employed to plan and execute building demolition at a huge expense.

That day 4 buildings collapsed in a controlled manner - not one slewed off sideways or toppled over they all went straight down, two collapsed (the twin buildings) under a situation they were supposedly designed to withstand.

The other two for not much reason at all. I would have thought that this would be about a million to one occurrence.

Obviously if not the demolition industry had been ripping off its customers for years as buildings just naturally collapse straight down in a controlled manner though I do not know of one other instance where this happened.

The plane which crashed into the pentagon which left a whole too small for the plane to fit inside but also left no wreckage outside.

The wings would not have fitted into the building but there was absolutely nothing on the ground.

No whole in the ground no indication of fire no bits of wing or engines - just nothing at all.

How did this happen – I have no idea.

Everywhere you look at this story you find points which are difficult to believe.

I can not believe that the US did this themself but there is more here than we have been told.

stryder wrote on Jun 18^th, 2011 at 11:31am:


The point is that there is nothing in the mainstream version which actually supports that it was Bin Laden who was responsible.

It is just there - common knowledge and statments but it is actually not backed with any real data.

All I am saying is that I din't know either way if he was responsible or not.

stryder wrote on Jun 18^th, 2011 at 12:10pm:

http://www.google.com.au/search?q=building+collapse&hl=en&biw=1680&bih=916&prmd=...



My understanding has always been that this type of building failure is by far the most likely.

Maybe they are now designed to fall in a controlled manner but I have never heard of this being the case.

To my knowledge a building to collapse in a controlled manner naturally would be rare but for 4 buildings in the same location to do it on the same day without any explanation is very difficult to believe.