longweekend58 wrote on May 16
th, 2011 at 12:14pm:
you dont know much about our electoral system it seems. The Greens picked up disaffected LABOR voters - not voters in general. and what you call 'conviction' is meaningless unless it is teste in the heat of actual legislation and public acceptance. it is easy to maintain convictions - even if they are stupid ones - when you never have to implement them. Labor and Liberal actually have to form real policies that work int eh real world and to compromise and negotiate them into being. Teh Greens just sit onthe side, vote No all the time and then declare themselves to be ideologically pure. they are a worthless rabble.
That would be true except for the fact that Greens have lost voters, and these losses haven't re-emerged in Labor, but instead in Liberals.
Goes to show who has NO IDEA about the electoral system, or how to analyse...except of course for what his lovely rightards tell him from News Ltd.
As for convictions, what complete rubbish you just spewed. Parties have their policies, and regardless of where they are in being able to legislate, they must hold to these policies. That's how the results in compromise and negotiations come to be. You complete whack.
And for voting No all the time - are you completely lost in today's political scene? It's the coalition who ALWAYS votes no. Greens may vote no, they THEN comprimise and negotiate with Labor as to their own political views and policies, and then will pass the legislation through. All but the ETS has this occurred.