Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 25
Send Topic Print
The Soren Challenge (Read 45067 times)
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #180 - Oct 24th, 2011 at 8:29am
 
Emma wrote on Oct 24th, 2011 at 12:33am:
Get out of it.! Wink

But seriously folks - if people don't care about their own 'backyard' ..they're not going to care about the wider issue.

Which is ???  

10 points out of 10 if you say the 'environment'.

Like the old saying goes  "Look after the pennies and the pounds will take care of themselves".

Clear enough?? Smiley



As clear as any of you posts.

I have given you concrete proposals. If you disagree with them, say why. Bluster and empty cliches are not sufficient.
If you agree, say so.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #181 - Oct 24th, 2011 at 9:21am
 
Soren wrote on Oct 23rd, 2011 at 8:05pm:
1. Zero net immigration. Drastic cut in family reunion.
2. Carbon dioxide tax on all goods, including all imported goods and coal exports.
3. Proceeds to be spent excusively on achieving clean energy independence, R&D on renewables and skills education
4. No ETS and absolutely no transfer of funds overseas in the guise of 'carbon credits'.
5. Dam all rivers that can be dammed.
6. All domestic energy (for heating, running domestic appliances and lighting) to be locally produced solar



These are explicitly environmentally progrssive ideas in Australia's national interest. I don't see how anyone could construe them as teasing.

Unless, of course, you have a great deal of difficulty with conflicting PC pieties wrestling for your progressive heart.



I just see the first one as being simplistic and agenda driven. We'll probably depend on immigration to maintain any kind of sustained level of economic activity. We are still drastically short of engineers for example. If we end up bankrupt, then our hands will be tied economically. We'd probably depend on China for assistance - and that's the way the whole world is headed. So if you agreed, you'd allow some professionals, but not their immediate families? c'mon.

2 and 3 are too much aligned with my own way of thinking for me to try to dispute, but there are problems with the details. Political survival is the biggest.

4. Agree with most, however I can see that a well supervised ETS for bigger polluters only can be a good thing. I know of one company that is hanging out for an ETS just to install some new low carbon technology.  We need the carrot and the stick approach but we need to learn from the lessons of Europe. Do I trust the current Department of Climate Change to get it right? No. They have to the most inept bunch of recent graduates that I've ever had the displeasure to deal with. They are "green" in more ways than one.  Some of them are very very smart, but they were obviously not chosen for their practical knowledge or social skills.     

5. That's woefully simplistic. I'm surprised at that statement coming from you. The opportunity for hydro electric generation is very limited in this country due to patchy rainfall for one thing. Again it's a balancing act. Everything has to be considered in terms of overall justification.

6. Yes, but there's solar and there is solar. The solar PV scheme was great, but it's a totally wasted use of funds. More efficient alternatives are available.  We should be mandating solar airconditioning and smart design (ventilation etc) in all new buildings over a threshold size - here I'm talking about office complexes.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 24th, 2011 at 9:30am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96347
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #182 - Oct 24th, 2011 at 11:09am
 
Zero net immigration? That's like the argument that a carbon tax will send production - and carbon emissions - overseas.

Only in this case we'd be leaving people overseas to produce carbon there.

Still, I sympathise. The problem the zero immigration crowd have is the lack of skilled labour because business doesn't want to spend the money on training. Not to mention the lack of cheap labour needed to wipe all those baby boomers' arses.

And not to mention the fact that immigration policy has been bipartisan since the end of WWII. The cause: the business lobbies and their desire for constant economic growth.

Still, if solutions to global warming don't address population levels, we're dreaming.

It's quite likely that when the old boy gets sent to a nursing home he'll have a tinted AIN bossing him around.

Karma.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #183 - Oct 24th, 2011 at 11:18am
 
muso wrote on Oct 24th, 2011 at 9:21am:
Soren wrote on Oct 23rd, 2011 at 8:05pm:
1. Zero net immigration. Drastic cut in family reunion.
2. Carbon dioxide tax on all goods, including all imported goods and coal exports.
3. Proceeds to be spent excusively on achieving clean energy independence, R&D on renewables and skills education
4. No ETS and absolutely no transfer of funds overseas in the guise of 'carbon credits'.
5. Dam all rivers that can be dammed.
6. All domestic energy (for heating, running domestic appliances and lighting) to be locally produced solar



These are explicitly environmentally progrssive ideas in Australia's national interest. I don't see how anyone could construe them as teasing.

Unless, of course, you have a great deal of difficulty with conflicting PC pieties wrestling for your progressive heart.



I just see the first one as being simplistic and agenda driven. We'll probably depend on immigration to maintain any kind of sustained level of economic activity. We are still drastically short of engineers for example. If we end up bankrupt, then our hands will be tied economically. We'd probably depend on China for assistance - and that's the way the whole world is headed. So if you agreed, you'd allow some professionals, but not their immediate families? c'mon.




I said zero NET immigration and 'drastically reduce', not abolish,  family re-union. The plumber and the nurse and their kids are OK.
Not their extended family, including brothers, sisters, theirt wives and husbands and all their kids and parents (this of course happens mostly with refugees, not skilled migrants).

ANyway, I do not accept that a continuously growing population is a good thing in itself. In any case, if we do need more people, we could make them here, couldn't we? (I have three that I made earlier, as TV chefs say.) Or is that also now something productive we have to send offshore?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
barnaby joe
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1992
euchareena
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #184 - Oct 24th, 2011 at 5:09pm
 
does this mean that soren believes in climate change now
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
barnaby joe
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1992
euchareena
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #185 - Oct 24th, 2011 at 5:09pm
 
the platform 13 of his heart
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Emma
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #186 - Oct 24th, 2011 at 10:43pm
 
perhaps Soren is starting to see.!! Wink Shocked
Back to top
 

live every day
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #187 - Oct 25th, 2011 at 9:50am
 
Karnal wrote on Oct 24th, 2011 at 11:09am:
Still, if solutions to global warming don't address population levels, we're dreaming.



Agree, but there is not a hell of a lot we can do to reduce the world's population in a relatively short period of time. 

Even if we went to a totally insane extreme, there are not enough bullets being manufactured.  (take that as sick/ black humour whatever)

Any solutions we come up with must acknowledge the fact that the world's human population is going to remain perilously high for quite some time.

Anything we can do to produce sustainable "anything", will help but there are no easy solutions.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #188 - Oct 25th, 2011 at 9:54am
 
Soren wrote on Oct 24th, 2011 at 11:18am:
ANyway, I do not accept that a continuously growing population is a good thing in itself. In any case, if we do need more people, we could make them here, couldn't we? (I have three that I made earlier, as TV chefs say.) Or is that also now something productive we have to send offshore?



Apparently so. Many European countries, including France for example are going backwards in terms of population growth.

It's a function of urban living/ "developed" economy.

Maybe you could start an advertising  campaign.  Tongue

"F" is for our future" ?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 25th, 2011 at 10:05am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
barnaby joe
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1992
euchareena
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #189 - Oct 25th, 2011 at 9:56am
 
nanobomb china - that would work

develop nanotechnological weapons of mass destruction that convert entire urban areas into rainforests instantly and exterminate everybody within a certain range
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #190 - Oct 25th, 2011 at 9:58am
 
barnaby joe wrote on Oct 24th, 2011 at 5:09pm:
does this mean that soren believes in climate change now


I'd rather not "believe" in something like that. I find the idea somewhat abhorrent. I'd prefer to make a rational decision based on understanding of a comprehensive set of data using scientific principles.

I still think that it's dishonest (not you, Soren) trying to  obfuscate the science for idealistic reasons. Even if the issue has been hijacked (which it has to some extent), the target should be the hijackers, not the science.  

Knowledge to me is sacred.  
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
barnaby joe
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1992
euchareena
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #191 - Oct 25th, 2011 at 10:01am
 
muso wrote on Oct 25th, 2011 at 9:58am:
barnaby joe wrote on Oct 24th, 2011 at 5:09pm:
does this mean that soren believes in climate change now


I'd rather not "believe". I'd prefer to make a rational decision based on rational understanding of the facts provided.

I still think that it's dishonest (not you, Soren) trying to  obfuscate the science for idealistic reasons. Even if the issue has been hijacked (which it has to some extent), the target should be the hijackers, not the science.  

Knowledge to me is sacred.  


ppl arent rational mate (most people anyway lol, though most people who are seemingly 'rational' on one issue can compartmentalise and rationalise on other things)

they are rationalisers - everybody has an agenda and everybody compartmentalises

that has nothing to do with whether soren is right or wrong though - people with agendas can actually be right, too
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #192 - Oct 25th, 2011 at 10:03am
 
barnaby joe wrote on Oct 25th, 2011 at 9:56am:
nanobomb china - that would work

develop nanotechnological weapons of mass destruction that convert entire urban areas into rainforests instantly and exterminate everybody within a certain range


Wow! Talking of WoW, what Level do you get those at? Do you need some extra module on your research center?
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
barnaby joe
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1992
euchareena
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #193 - Oct 25th, 2011 at 10:05am
 
muso wrote on Oct 25th, 2011 at 10:03am:
barnaby joe wrote on Oct 25th, 2011 at 9:56am:
nanobomb china - that would work

develop nanotechnological weapons of mass destruction that convert entire urban areas into rainforests instantly and exterminate everybody within a certain range


Wow! Talking of WoW, what Level do you get those at? Do you need some extra module on your research center?


this is actually from an old, obscure PC game called call to power 2

there is a political system in the future epoch of the game called envirotopia which is a militant environmentalist government

it has an ingame military unit called an ecoterrorist that makes use of nano assemblers to deconstruct entire urban areas and make them into rainforests
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #194 - Oct 25th, 2011 at 10:08am
 
barnaby joe wrote on Oct 25th, 2011 at 10:05am:
this is actually from an old, obscure PC game called call to power 2

there is a political system in the future epoch of the game called envirotopia which is a militant environmentalist government

it has an ingame military unit called an ecoterrorist that makes use of nano assemblers to deconstruct entire urban areas and make them into rainforests


omg  Shocked
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 25
Send Topic Print