Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 ... 25
Send Topic Print
The Soren Challenge (Read 45097 times)
Emma
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #225 - Oct 28th, 2011 at 9:30pm
 
just a courtesy - 
Tongue
Back to top
 

live every day
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #226 - Oct 28th, 2011 at 9:32pm
 
Emma wrote on Oct 28th, 2011 at 9:30pm:
just a courtesy -  
Tongue



Rise. No need to courtsey me.
Wink
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 29th, 2011 at 3:47pm by Soren »  
 
IP Logged
 
Emma
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #227 - Oct 28th, 2011 at 9:40pm
 
huh....... that's obvious. Smiley
Back to top
 

live every day
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #228 - Oct 29th, 2011 at 10:34am
 
Emma wrote on Oct 28th, 2011 at 8:19pm:
'This is what happens when you have a forum of people who just come on here to tease others. Turn your back and the place goes to sh1t.' -  Muso

Haha Muso - this is true -  I think!??
As a literal being, and given it's placement, I have to wonder?  What do you mean Muso???

Enigmatic statements can be expected from me,  Roll Eyes
But what do YOU mean Muso.  U r the mod.

I confess to being a simpleton, compared to some, ..about some things ................are u dissing Sadme??????
Or am I PARANOID? Smiley


I'm dissing you, but only in a friendly sort of way - what I meant was that Soren was teasing you.  (the bastard)
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
barnaby joe
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1992
euchareena
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #229 - Oct 29th, 2011 at 10:34am
 
soren ya old smoothie Wink Wink Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96347
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #230 - Oct 29th, 2011 at 3:53pm
 
Soren wrote on Oct 28th, 2011 at 10:41am:


How very peculiar, my dear fellow. You seem to be arguing against a phenomenon called "AGW".

And here we were thinking you'd joined the faculty.

It just goes to show: a leopard cannot change his spots.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #231 - Oct 29th, 2011 at 4:01pm
 
Sometimes (very rarely) I wish I knew what the bugger you are on about, PB. Once again, this ain't one of them times. Move on.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96347
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #232 - Oct 29th, 2011 at 10:31pm
 
Well, it's really quite simple, dear. One minute you seem to be saying that global warming exists - it's just the idea of a state-imposed tax or ETS that's the problem. After all, how can you trust an incompetant government to solve a problem like global warming?

It will never work.

Then, lo and behold - you post arguments that global warming is not happening at all! It is all a big lie; an exaggeration; absolute nonsense; sh!t on stilts.

It's a shifting argument, of course. Well, an argument's a bit strong - it's more of a theme; a talking point; a point of departure.

A dream.

As we know so well, dear boy, all that is solid melts into air.

Truth is such a tricky thing, old chap, such slave morality. Why bother with such ordinary conventions as rhetoric?

As Mrs Beaton would say, first you must catch your argument.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Emma
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #233 - Oct 29th, 2011 at 11:28pm
 
sigh  --  Cool
OK I can manage to get that thru my turgid grey matter .....ta M.
Smiley Wink U ol' coochie coochiee Kiss

Yes - intake of fluid is most important for one's wellbeing - wet brains are better than dry ones.
OOOps bit off track there. Sorry.!!

It is so  humid up here, and the frogs are full on vocal.
Gonna be plenty of wet here in QLD again this summer. Its actually started already , in Cairns, which received the highest 24 hr rainfall total ever recorded. (Presumably for October?  Undecided)

Up here in the news, we are told to expect a wetter than normal summer....  then they hasten to add,  BUT not as bad as last yr. !!   Lets hope they're right.
Already discussions have been had, and committees have met to address a recommendation that the Water authorities in charge of the major dams up here, start to release water from the dams NOW so that the floods of 2010 /2011, affecting towns and cities including Ipswich and Brisbane,  don't happen again in 2011/2012. GOOD LUCK.

Could quote Bob Dylan  ..the times they are a-changin'

And Good luck to you and all of us here.  
So far so good.
Wink  Huh
Back to top
 

live every day
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #234 - Oct 30th, 2011 at 3:18pm
 
Karnal wrote on Oct 29th, 2011 at 10:31pm:
Well, it's really quite simple, dear. One minute you seem to be saying that global warming exists - it's just the idea of a state-imposed tax or ETS that's the problem. After all, how can you trust an incompetant government to solve a problem like global warming?

It will never work.

Then, lo and behold - you post arguments that global warming is not happening at all! It is all a big lie; an exaggeration; absolute nonsense; sh!t on stilts.

It's a shifting argument, of course. Well, an argument's a bit strong - it's more of a theme; a talking point; a point of departure.

A dream.

As we know so well, dear boy, all that is solid melts into air.

Truth is such a tricky thing, old chap, such slave morality. Why bother with such ordinary conventions as rhetoric?

As Mrs Beaton would say, first you must catch your argument.



AGW is not happening.
Even if it was, ETS/tax wouldn't be the answer.


I am sorry if I'm going too fast for you.






Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 30th, 2011 at 9:51pm by Soren »  
 
IP Logged
 
barnaby joe
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1992
euchareena
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #235 - Oct 30th, 2011 at 9:40pm
 
Slow down you are going too fast for me even now
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Emma
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #236 - Oct 30th, 2011 at 10:24pm
 
Say? Soren ??  What does the 'A' in AGW stand for again???

In fact - just spell it out pls  Smiley
Back to top
 

live every day
 
IP Logged
 
Emma
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #237 - Oct 30th, 2011 at 10:37pm
 
Just had the most spectacular light show here.  Glad I don't live where the action happened. 

It was wild.!!
Back to top
 

live every day
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #238 - Oct 31st, 2011 at 8:51am
 
Emma wrote on Oct 30th, 2011 at 10:24pm:
Say? Soren ??  What does the 'A' in AGW stand for again???

In fact - just spell it out pls  Smiley


A is for Anthropogenic. Human generated (Gr, anthropos, human + L generatus, generate)

G is for global. L. globus, ball, round thingy, ie the entire Earth.

W is for warming. From Norse > OE. warm





Oh. And Tea is for Twinings.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 1st, 2011 at 8:58am by Soren »  
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Soren Challenge
Reply #239 - Oct 31st, 2011 at 6:36pm
 
You know that bit about carbon dioxide is produced when you burn anything with carbon in it?

- and the bit about carbon dioxide absorbing in the Infrared?

- and the fact that atmospheric levels have increased by about 30% since we started burning coal and oil?

- and the fact that if we continue to burn fuels etc at the projected rate, the atmospheric concentration will effectively double by around 2050 (give or take) ?

Well Soren is saying that all of the above are untruths/fibs/  fabrications by a conspiracy of scientists (and presumably I'm part of that same conspiracy) who want to take over the world  (you know - the Hollywood stereotype  of an evil scientist? Of course Hollywoood always gets their stereotypes right as we all know. )

Now on one side there is that band of reprobate climatologists and other "warmist sympathisers", which includes such nefarious organisations as the CSIRO, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology and just about every Academy of Sciences in the entire world.

Meantime on the other side (the cowboys with the white hats), there are one or two very strange individuals, such as Richard (Smoking is good for you) Lindzen and Roy (God will save the planet) Spencer.

Soren's point is that these guys are right, and the rest are ... well evil scientists doing what evil scientists do.

Is that a fair summary?  
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 ... 25
Send Topic Print