bogarde73 wrote on Jun 4
th, 2011 at 11:45am:
Grey, I don't think you addressed any of the points I made in coming to my change of view.
Yes I did
Quote:That's OK as a general proposition Grey, but general propositions don't always apply.
I mean, by that logic, the diggers should in fact have stayed at Gallipoli. It was a great idea to attack the enemy from the south but they should have considered the terrain etc.The Afghanistan campaign is now the equivalent of Vietnam.
I made the case quite clearly that Afghanistan is nothing like Vietnam (or Gallipoli)
Quote:The enemy can move over the border to Pakistan whenever he likes, from where he can also be supplied with impunity.
And we chase them there with drones. And if we surrender Afghanistan the Islamofascists will take Pakistan and move on towards India through Kashmir. And no this isn't MY domino theory this is their stated objectives.
Quote:Or he can melt back into the general population and nobody knows or is willing to say who he is.
See Video for Australian soldiers ground view opinion.
Quote:You could in theory kill every Afghani but their tribal brothers would just move over the mountains & plains and take up their land and it would go on.
There is no end to it. It's a bottomless pit.
As I've said, we're not fighting 'every Afghan' not by a long chalk, it's a mop up operation that's undermanned certainly but the Taliban and their Al Quaeda brothers are caught between mainstream Pakistan in the South and the Afghan/NATO coalition, they're the ones facing obliteration and their only rescuers are the 'woosies west' coalition.