Just fixing your typo, Smithy...

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 6^th, 2011 at 1:15pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 6^th, 2011 at 1:15pm:


Thank you for sharing smithy.

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 6^th, 2011 at 1:20pm:

So you have used 2 useless examples now. Do you have 1 real example or are you all talk.

progressiveslol wrote on Jun 6^th, 2011 at 1:22pm:


Unlike many here I realise when smashing my head against a brick wall.
And yes it feels good after you stop for awhile I don't get any jollies from it.
You don't believe in CC or that if by some miracle your wrong we should do anything to mitigate it's effect, business as usual in fact can we dig & pollute any faster?
Each to their own, next election you might still be able to vote for Mr NO & you'll get everything you want.

darkhall67 wrote on Jun 6^th, 2011 at 1:08pm:




not really only if they want to be PM...although I still prefer true blue honesty.. I know its wishful thinking.. but I prefer it, you dont so you can suck it up..

sad for me that this country has gone down the road that its okay to lie and cheat just dont get caught.or do it in the house.. because then you are in trouble..

if you lie to the masses nothing those slobs can do about it so its okay

Equitist wrote on Jun 6^th, 2011 at 1:10pm:




of course its a compliment nem... you know me.. you willl never see someone elses point of view.. so that means you are right... and everyone that disagrees with you is wrong..


so what wrong with giving you guys the reins and leading us through troubled waters..

I mean your knowledge is astounding.. on every subject..we would be on a winner thats for sure... move over gillard and brown... you have had your day.

as for their sexual preferences... well all i know is... I like to know what we have leading the country... I dont care if he/she is gay... as long as they dont pretend they are anything else...it hasnt done brown any harm that I have seen anyway,...

I think we have enough hypocracy in our parliament thats all..

and some on here think its a a good thing if someone hides their real sexuality or is a womaniser, and dumps their wife as soon as they leave office.. they think its ok... so what I dont argue with that...


they are arguing with my point of view..

Abbott is a catholic..he has never denied that.. yet rudd is a catholic and chose to go to another church.. dont think hes been seen there since he got stabbed.but I know if that was Abbott you would all have made mincemeat out of him..lol.

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 6^th, 2011 at 12:59pm:

You have many many more chemical change examples to choose from.....

...but it won't matter ! If nobodys home then nobodys home!!! 

The bathtub example of flow rates in and out is what all the scientists use to explain to a lay audience accumulation and if they don't get that they stop bothering!!!

See, if people don't understand that then they look like idiots in front of thousands!!!!  No need to talk about Carbon Dioxide because the fools still pretending to not understand that things accumulate if you add things faster than you take them out!

TRY THIS ONE ON THE LIBERAL VOTERS: "If you look after the pennnies....."  They might give you a hint that someones home about then by grinning a tad too much!!!!!!!! 

Soren wrote on Jun 6^th, 2011 at 12:28pm:



... and you were going so well.

I said nobody was disputing the figures but that is not the point the author was making. You need to practice reading things s l o w l y so you understand them.

The author was stating that it was Jones' assessment of the significance of the figures that was incorrect, not the figures themselves.

The point Jones was trying to make was based on the figures but was definitely in dispute. That being the whole point of the article in question.

Oh well, you got really close. Next time, eh kid?