Soren wrote on Jun 5
th, 2011 at 10:15pm:
Luke Fowler wrote on Jun 5
th, 2011 at 10:05pm:
One shiny star for the missing the the point completely.
I don't think anyone could have missed it more decisively than you have today.
Well done, my pseudo-intellectual message board jockey.
Honestly, your missing-the-point work today has been breathtaking.
If I had access to fireworks, I would be firing them off right now; so rare an occasion it is that someone misses the point like you have.
Take a bow sir.
There's a guy posting also as Luke Fowler who said this not long ago:
Luke Fowler wrote on Mar 31
st, 2011 at 6:30pm:
Dismissing people who don't agree with your views on climate change as delusional and brainwashed seems like a fairly childish way to try and "win" an argument.
Are you two related?
You can still disagree with a point of view and understand it at the same time. Funny you missed the point about me telling you you had missed the point.
Is that a double-whammy? Well done.
Good to see you are following me around though.
Also, I applaud you for removing the Kierkegaard picture.
You having that as your avatar was just embarrassing for every one.
Let's face it, you aren't exactly a mental giant, and copying a picture off wikipedia isn't going to change this.
Here's the part where you start questioning my sexuality like you did last time you were made to look like a dunce.
Carry on.
You couldn't make a coherent point to save your life. All you can do is switch the subject to my avatar and your sexuality.
Jones's central point was the insignificance of the numbers. The article in response to it was just a load of emoting about everything except Jones's point: the insignificance of the numbers.