longweekend58 wrote on Jun 13
th, 2011 at 3:30pm:
Whats the difference between science and a belief?
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 13
th, 2011 at 3:30pm:
If you are stupid enough to ask that question hen you are too stupid to comprehend the answer.
![Smiley Smiley](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/smiley.gif)
Try me.
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 13
th, 2011 at 3:30pm:
We have polllies and writers desperately seeking a carbon tax and pronouncing how it will save the world and so on.
Extreme hyperbole right there, who pronounces that it will 'save the world'?
longweekend58 wrote on Jun 13
th, 2011 at 3:30pm:
yet in every single example of it being in use anywhere inthe world it has totally failed to acheive any of its objectives. Know this, what kind of person continues to push for a policy that is already known to NOT WORK?? Idealogues. EXtremists. rational people would suggest a different methodology.
We have been through this and you have failed to demonstrate this 'total failure'.
All sides of politics in Australia have recognised the need to lower emissions. There is a debate about the best way to do this.
It does not matter if you like it or not, believe in it or not, there is broad agreement in this country that a ETS/carbon tax is the best way to lower emissions. Broad agreement outside of politics obviously, but Turnbull has made things interesting.
Considering also what the rest of the world is doing i fail to see the extremism in the desire for a carbon tax.
Even if you don’t belive the science, i find it amazing that you think a carbon tax is extreme.What would a desire to shut down all powerstaions and go back to wood fires and kerosene be considered?
Super duper extreme? Is there a more extreme word than extreme?
Ive explained this more times than you can understand. I opposed the carbon tax because it DOES NOT WORK. let me try this again...
it has been tried and failed. The EU said exactly that. Phase one of their ETS has not reduced emissions AT ALL. it did not reduce the rate of increaese either. it had ZERO EFFECT. this is also the experience of other countries.
You are probably too young to remember how the massive smog pollution from cars was ended. modern cars now produce 1/10,000 the amount of their 1970s equivalents. How do you think that major problem was fixed? let me give you a clue. They didnt tax emissions. They legislated their way around it. and voila! it worked. Amazing, aint it!